Jesus in Jeans...What do you think about this?
By Phyrre
@phyrre (2317)
United States
June 19, 2009 5:25pm CST
I was wondering about what everyone thought about this.
If you haven't heard, a church in England used about 35,000 pounds, I believe, to build a statue dubbed "Jesus in Jeans" in an attempt to modernize Jesus and, I think, to make him more accessible to younger people. Here's a picture:
http://thebeattitude.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/jesus-in-jeans.jpg
I think this is just kind of creepy and, personally, I think it goes too far. I mean, I was baptized Methodist, but I'm not really a Christian anymore and even I think it's slightly offensive. What's wrong with Jesus just being Jesus? Why does he have to be modernized?
I realize that differently people have different beliefs (heck, I'm one of those people, LOL!). But to me it just seems like a bit of a crazy idea. I think I would prefer to believe in Jesus as Jesus, not as some modern, hype teenager. With some of the teenagers I see lately, that idea kind of scares me. o_0 Obviously not all teenagers (since I am one, that would be kind of strange), but a lot of recent teenagers.
Anyway, I was wondering what everyone else thought about this new statue? Yay or nay? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
4 people like this
12 responses
@vetiver12 (163)
• Spain
20 Jun 09
Jesus is one of the people in history which I admire the most. Because unlike any other god which we don´t know if exists or not, Jesus was real and the things he did for others where real. With that, I´m not saying that I´m a religious people, I don´t go to church, or pray, or...... but Jesus is Jesus.
But, well, I´m not too strict about this kind of things, since I didn´t find it offensive,but well, I know that not all the people are going to agree with that and I understand it.
@dogsnme (1264)
• United States
20 Jun 09
I don't agree with it. By presenting Jesus in this way, "in an attempt to modernize Jesus", "to make him more accessible to younger people," you flirt with the idea of making God in man's image. You in a sense, bring God down to man's level. By doing this you lessen the greatness and holiness of God. God will not change to suit us. He asks that we allow Him to change us. The Church should present Jesus as he is, not as we would like for him to be.
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
20 Jun 09
That's certainly an interesting way of looking at it. I hadn't thought about it like that.
But isn't Jesus just a human? He's not God, but the son of God, so it's not really bringing GOD down to man's level, is it, since God and Jesus aren't synonymous or the same thing, but that God is above Jesus?
Sorry about the question. This has always been a point that I've wondered about. :)
@darkangel079 (1498)
• United States
20 Jun 09
I didn't find anything creepy about. I'm sure if Jesus was here in our time he would've wore jeans too. Didn't the Bible say that Jesus in his time share in people's humanity? People get a picture all the time that Jesus was just a man in fine robes and such. Knowing that Christ came long ago, wasn't the type of person people looked at, but it was his words that inspired. I don't think jeans would've been harmful or people should get worked up about it. Funny thing though is that, the statue in no way looks like the usual portray of the religious figured Jesus with long hair or full grown beard. Either way, it's alright.
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
20 Jun 09
That's what I was noticing, too, that there was no beard and my fiance pointed out that his hair style looked a little what he would call "preppy". Long hair is pretty common nowadays, so I'm not sure why they decided to make it shorter for the statue.
@reckon21 (3479)
• Philippines
20 Jun 09
What the heck..why would they do that? Are
they our of their minds. Jesus is not a product
that you can improved or tailored to the trend
of today's society. He is God...even if you don't
believe him. He deserves respect not fashion statement.
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
20 Jun 09
Well, I'm pretty sure the people that commissioned this statue have quite a bit of respect for Jesus, considering they're a church and all, and I don't think this was meant to disrespect Jesus, either. I think it was more of an attempt to make young people accept and respect Jesus a bit more.
@jeneias (608)
• United States
19 Jun 09
I'm on the fence. I understand what you mean...why can't Jesus just be Jesus...but I think of it differently. And maybe this was not the churches intention with the statue, but these are my thoughts and interpretations of the story and image:
Jesus doesn't discriminate. I was just thinking of this the other night while praying -- well, God gave me this idea, is a better way of putting it, lol. Jesus is Emo, He's Hip-Hop, He's Country/Hillbilly, He's Upperclass, He's a Hobo. Now if I left it at that, you'd probably think I'm crazy...Jesus, homeless? Pfft. But what I mean by that is...He does not care what you are or where you came from. He doesn't care how you dress or speak or walk. He accepts anybody who is willing to accept Him. And basically, that's the message i get from this statue. What's wrong with kids or teens looking up at a statue of Jesus in bluejeans and a white tee and say, "Hey, isn't He cool? Yea, that's my Savior." Jesus can be cool too. That's just how I see it.
And again, the church might not have been trying to convey that message. But, sometimes it doesn't matter what you mean to convey....everything can be understood differently. If that makes sense. :)
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
19 Jun 09
I definitely agree with your interpretation as Jesus can be anything, and I like the way you describe it. It doesn't matter who you are for Jesus to accept you and I agree that that's an important concept.
I dunno, I just don't think that your savior should be "cool". Well, I wouldn't mind them being cool, but I think it's weird to need there to be a statue. It's like bragging about who's father is better. "My savior is cooler and more hype than yours". That seems to be the message that it's spreading to me, but that's just my way of looking at it. There are plenty of others. xD
I agree, though, that it doesn't matter what the church conveys, but that it really depends on how people interpret it. ^_^
1 person likes this
@jeneias (608)
• United States
19 Jun 09
"To each his own" as it goes, right? I see it as being proud of having a Savior like Jesus, not really bragging. And by pride, I don't mean in the bad sense. All emotions are two-sided: God's feelings or Satan's feelings. And I believe you can be proud of some things. Jesus is one of them. Not in the sense of....oh, I own Him, or anything. But proud of what He does and Has does throughout history. I do understand how it could be considered bragging, though. But hey, if I brag about anything, might as well be about my Lord & Savior and not myself, amirite? ;)
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
19 Jun 09
LOL! Well, I can't argue with that! Of all the negative things you can brag about nowadays, your savior is definitely one of those positive things that you certainly have the right to brag about.
And I know you didn't mean it as they would be bragging about it, that's just what it comes off to me. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's because I'm a pessimist at heart? xD
1 person likes this
@vinslounge (1295)
• India
20 Jun 09
I am not a christian and i do not think many will get offended by this act of dpeicting Jesus in Jeans. But at the same time some people will get offended by this act. I am not sure how it will be taken in that country. Depicitng Jesus in a modern way is some what a good idea to be appreciated and there is nothing to harm anyone by this act.
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
20 Jun 09
I'm not Christian, either, and I do have my own beliefs, too, so I understand where you're coming from. :)
Thank you for your views. I know there are a lot of people that won't get offended by it, but some will, I'm sure. ^_^ I'm not offended by it, I just think it's kind of strange.
@Mitraa (3184)
• India
20 Jun 09
This is the expression of a crazy idea! We regard Jesus, but we can never put whatever we want or choose with the image of Jesus. Can we do such practice with a living person already around us? If not, then why this is to be practised with Jesus, to whom billions of people on this earth regard? This sort of activities in the form of art or craft in media must be banned!
Thanks for this nice information and have a good day!
1 person likes this
@friendship4lyfe (520)
• Saint Lucia
20 Jun 09
I really agree with you on that.I think its disrepectful to jesus christ.I believe that he accept us regardless of who we are and our walks of life.We shouldnt discriminate but why would a church want to modernize him he wants us to be close to him but come on is that really necessary.jesus in jeans plz.
1 person likes this
@geniustiger (1694)
• Philippines
20 Jun 09
It is just the idea of the artist to make some
new style of having his jeans sold out. Jesus
is powerful and the creator of all things on earth. Thats
why he printed it to come up with lifestyle just for the
sake of his business. Usually believers or not but like it
would really buy for they think it is modernize and upgraded.
New style in 9k generations.
1 person likes this
@leiann_561 (332)
• Philippines
20 Jun 09
I guess that it will be the strange thing I will see Jesus in Jeans. I never even think about or imagine it. I always see his image crucified in the cross. But it is pretty amazing that they conceptualize it.
@DIGITALGAURAV (3)
• India
20 Jun 09
i personally think jesus in jeans is a crazy idea. its just a way to get cheap publicity. jesus christ was a saint considered as sun of god. lot of people worship him as god. nobody has a right to play with their emotions. if u cant follow his teachings, don't humiliate him. leave him alone. he is a symbol of faith, purity & goodness. nobody has a right to defame him. jesus is perfect don't experiment with him.
1 person likes this
@phyrre (2317)
• United States
20 Jun 09
I don't know if I would consider this really to "defame" him. While it may have been good for publicity, true, I think it was also an honest attempt to make people more interested in the church, since more and more young people seem to not be interested in religion at all.
But I don't know how it would "defame" him? Do you mind explaining for me? :) Sorry that I didn't understand.