Michael Jackson's Will Opened! He's NOT the father of the children?? WhAt?
By Bearballew
@Bearballew (1148)
United States
June 30, 2009 3:51pm CST
Can you believe how they are treating this poor man in death? Worse than when he was alive! The will has been reportedly opened and money is to be given to Katherine, (Mom), children (3) and a few charities. Joe Jackson is reportedly left out of the will. gee... I wonder shy...
Now here's the kicker. Reports are online stating that Michael is NOT the father of the three children and that Debbie Rowe isn't the Mother! Reports are that the dermotologist is the father and someone else donated eggs! MJ Jr and Paris were concieved in a petri dish. Prince MJ2's bio mother didn't know who she was carrying the Baby for! They say that one of Michael's lawyers just picked him up from the hospital after he was born and delivered him to Michael. (Like the stork?) Oh dear. What do you think of this?? Being an adopted child never knowing my sperm donor, I can tell you that it really doesn't matter who's sperm was used inyour creation when you are loved by a good man who wants you to call him Daddy. Who is so in love with you that he just can't stand it. Who works hard to provide for you, prays with and for and over you, teaches you to fly a kite and survive geometry and algebra... THAT is a REAL father.
I'm hoping these innocent ones are protected no matter HOW they came to be. God designed their little bodies to life and they have a right to be treated as the children of the father that claimed them. Michael claimed them, they claimed him. Leave it alone. (Didn't their Daddy write a song like that? Just Leave Me Alone...)
4 people like this
8 responses
@BonezFashion (53)
• United States
30 Jun 09
Oh my gosh.....Goodness why can't people just the guy alone. Some things just need to be private. It really wouldn't even matter if he is truly not their biological father. He raisedd them as if they were his own.
..::R.I.P MJ::..
1 person likes this
@Bearballew (1148)
• United States
2 Jul 09
Amen Bonez!!
Thay are HIS babies. Done. Seal it. Love overcomes blood. How many people know that?
@apgh09 (514)
• United States
4 Jul 09
unfortunately this is the price a person pays when you become famous no privacy, no peace. And the media is evil they always want to report negative news oh yeah they will drop a positive story in there somewhere but we all know that in media the negative out weighs the positive. I will be glad when this is over and MJ will be allowed to finally rest in peace h must be turning in gave about his children. he was a man who made it to be extremely famous we should not forget that. yes the jackson family needs there privacy.
@kykidd (6812)
• United States
30 Jun 09
I'm pretty sure that since he was living as their father all their life that they will still be considered his kids. I hope his parents get custody. It is going to be a long and drawn out battle. I hope it does not wear on the children too much, and that it will only make them stronger. Bless you!
1 person likes this
@Bearballew (1148)
• United States
2 Jul 09
I have to say that Michael has done a SUPERB job of protecting his babies from the media. I think they have grown up with a very good sense of family. That should stay in tact. Indeed, this is hard and will continue to be hard on them. I feel Katherine will guard them with her life!!
@jwfarrimond (4473)
•
2 Jul 09
This came out a few days ago. I'm not going to make any comment about the ethics of it all, but I do wonder that since they are not the biological children of either MJ or his wife, did they legally adopt them? If not, do the children have any legal claim on his estate, will or no will?
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
2 Jul 09
I am not a Michael Jackson hero worshipper but as a mother of two adopted sons who are now grown, legally and morally I am considered the mother and my husband the father. As for who and what the money is going to, it does not mean that his children, however they were conceived (Have you considered the Michael Jackson with the condition that destroys the pigment of his skin, may have decided to go through artificial insemination in order to have children and that there may have been more severe problems such as deadly skin cancers associated with his condition?) As for being a wonderful man, does it make him more wonderful that other men who have adopted or claimed children gotten from sperm banks, etc. because he is famous?
The fact is if he is legally their father, the court cannot say "well give the money to someone else." because you seem to think that because he probably is not the biological father, the money will be taken from the children and given to charity.
As for Joe Jackson, I do not know what that is all about. It could be that he was provided by another method, maybe his father knew he was not that well, and made a living will.
@blue65packer (11826)
• United States
2 Jul 09
I've heard all those things myself! I'm not surprised Michael left guardianship to his mom of his 3 kids. The way his father treated Michael as a child and his siblings no wonder he was left out out of the will! With Michael's two oldest children they can't be his! Both are white,with blondeist hair and blue eyes! He can't be his kids! I wouldn't doubt his dermotologist is the father of Paris And MichaelJR.! Why Michael Jackson would do this is anyones guess! Debbie Rowe has to be the mother of Paris anf MJJR! I think they look like her in some ways! With Prince MichaelII I wouldn't be surprised the surrogant of him didn't know who she carried the baby for! Then it was so secert she had the baby and it was picked up at the hospital! She got paid,I'm sure,alot! When Prince MichaelII appeared it was like out of the blue! It was very strange! This story isn't closed yet and there are new chapters being written as we spreak!
@clutterbug (1051)
• United States
30 Jun 09
I read this earlier today, and it's unbelievable. I bet a book will be written one day about all of this. Who could have imagined? It's like a soap opera that got horribly out of hand.
@fasyahime (629)
• Malaysia
2 Jul 09
it's his children no matter how they come from!he protect his children very well compare to other people..he even better father than my father!why people won't leave him alone or worst his children alone!they are still kids and still mourning over their dad and now this where their existence been judged!i really can't understand it at all!let M.J R.I.P!
i really can't understand how the kids will fare under public glare even if they do well protected by their grandma!
@sauman2006 (125)
• India
2 Jul 09
The way the paparazzi dissects a celeb's life even after they have passed away is horrific . This publicity savvy insensitive dolts must be teached a lesson . I mean please let the man rest in peace and give his wife and his kids a break . They are still not out of the shock of lossing their ,and now what kind of effect will such revealations have on their mindset .....I think needs to do something about it
