What do you think about Korea's daredevil acts?

@jshekhar (1562)
India
July 4, 2009 1:36pm CST
Hello friends, I woke up today to get the news that Korea continued test firing its missiles off its Eastern coast. This much, despite the UN sanctions. What do you make up of this act? There is a school of thought going on that the UN is governed by the U.S. and in that way, they are somewhat justified in testing missiles. please contribute.
2 people like this
8 responses
@heathcliff (1415)
• United States
4 Jul 09
When it comes to nuclear proliferation, the five major powers at the time, France, Britain, The Soviet Union, The United States and CHINA, all agreed it would be in the world's best interest to keep nuclear weapons in as few hands as possible. Now while that was very elitist of them, it has its merits. Small countries with nothing to lose are more likely to use nuclear weapons to advance their agendas. As for North Korea specifically, what right do they have to bully South Korea and Japan with fear of imminent attack? Noone in the world is threatening North Korea's territory, just asking them to follow the same rules the rest of the world has agreed to. Continued saber-rattling and aggressive acts do not help. North Korea's actions just make the rest of the world want to spank them for misbehaving. Eventually the North Korean leadership will get to a point where nothing good can happen for their people: More aggressive sanctions or, ultimately, a war they cannot win. It is ironic that North Korea sees the UN as a US puppet when the UN is so often at odds with the US. In fact, the UN remains a weak body primarily because it cannot count on the US to back up its causes. In this case, however, with the US commitment to defending Japan and South Korea, it just comes down to North Korea versus The United States, like it or not. If China would just show some guts and initiative, and get their neighbor under control, it could save the rest of the world a lot of time and trouble.
1 person likes this
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
7 Jul 09
Hello friend, I am sure that if ten countries in this world have nukes, spread over all the continents, there would be serious danger to existence of human life in case of a major war, irrespective of the stature of the country. So, what prevents the U.S. by starting to disarm itself and set an example for the rest of the world to follow its path for world peace? All the countries possess nukes just to remind their rivals that they would not step back in case of a war.. thanks for responding, yours was a really informative response.
1 person likes this
@Bloggership (1104)
• Indonesia
4 Jul 09
That north koreans leader are so stubborn... They realize that their missiles activities are only makes its people suffer economically... They think that their could be the fearful country to deal with its military only.
1 person likes this
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
7 Jul 09
Hello friend, the point in argument is that why do you only try to prevent one particular country from having nukes? Why doesn't the U.S. set an example by disarming itself and then preach about peace??
1 person likes this
• United States
4 Jul 09
I think they are hoping for a fight. It's almost like they are just doing this out of spite. They were told to stop, and are continuing to do what they want....almost like my 18-month-old daughter. LOL. That's what Korea is.....a rebelious toddler.
1 person likes this
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
4 Jul 09
Hello friend, I respect your opinion but the other side is that the rest of the world does need to have some protection against the US's arsenal. I do not think it is fair on their part to dictate terms to the U.N. and keep sanctioning other countries, whereas they consider themselves free enough to possess as many missiles as they want. Thanks for responding. I am not for or against any of the two nations... just trying to draw a conclusion from the responses I get here.
1 person likes this
@PeacefulWmn9 (10420)
• United States
6 Jul 09
Hello Jshekhar. As a US citizen, I don't think we govern the UN...it is a world organization, and no one governs the whole world. I think our president is trying his best to use diplomacy as a first effort in dealing with Korea. But Korea, should they continue, are inviting trouble upon themselves from many sources! A good discussion, by the way :) Karen
1 person likes this
@oudine2 (147)
• Argentina
4 Jul 09
If the USA can have missiles of mass destruction, I think anybody can have them. USA invades all the countries they want, they did it in Afghanistan, in Irak, in all latinoamerica in the 70s, Vietnam, Korea, they are always attacking countries, so I don´t trust at all the USA. The only country that has ever used a mass destruction bomb was the USA, not Korea. So I am not afraid of Korea, I think that they have the right to have missiles as USA also has that right. If everybody stopped using them it´s ok, but as long as USA has the power to attack any nation they want, the other nations have the right to defend themselves. Having mass destruction weapons is a defensive strategy against very powerful countries as USA that continuously attack countries.
1 person likes this
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
4 Jul 09
Hello Oudine, That is precisely the point I was trying to make. You put them across in better words. Thanks a lot for that. The point is we either have a completely nuclear free, missile free world or we stack our cupboards with such weapons of mass destructions. There should not be different standards for different countries based on their econoimies. Cheers!
1 person likes this
• China
4 Jul 09
good.i am a chinese,i think your argument is right for all of us in south korsa is a problem
1 person likes this
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
7 Jul 09
thanks a lot for reponding, friend.
• United States
5 Jul 09
The problem is not that the US must be obeyed, by any means. The problem is that nations throughout the world have imposed sanctions, and N. Korea won't agree. Those countries who have nuclear power are not running tests in others' faces, endangering their neighbors and whomever might be in the area. I've studied the UN quite carefully, and the US is not its puppet master. All the lead nations have equal votes and equal influence, as well as veto power. If one does not like the US, that should not affect their feelings about the UN. Whatever one's feelings about the US might be, it is not the only country with nukes, nor does the US have the most nukes -- Russia has the most. Does it matter? All it will take is one to go off, and the automatic counterstrike set up by all the lead countries, and we will no longer be part of this planet, or whatever is left of it.
1 person likes this
@savypat (20216)
• United States
5 Jul 09
I think that N. Korea is playing a very dangerous game, you don't go out and play with the big powers with nukes. What are they going to say when they are squashed? Sorry we were just kidding. To late. N. Korea has played these games for years and we have always brought them off, this time they have stepped over the line and no good can come from it. It is our fault also for always buying their nonproliferation with money etc. When a ruler is a bully paying them off will never work, they just become a bigger bully.