Healthcare and Huge Taxes
By matersfish
@matersfish (6306)
United States
July 5, 2009 8:02pm CST
I'm seeking answers here! So, if anyone has them, don't be shy about dishing the dirt that I've missed.
Okay, we're drawing closer to having a countrywide healthcare reform take place. Look, forget about the rhetoric of where the money's coming from. We all know that, even if not immediately, the taxpayer will be milked in one form or another to pay for any and every "reform" that happens in America.
I'm not fully aware of all the details, but after watching about 20 hours of news, listening to radio, and researching different sources online, here's the best picture I can draw of the exact healthcare details that Obama Co is trying to get going:
All employers are mandated to offer insurance to employees. The cost of this insurance plan--I don't even think employers get to pick; it's forced upon them--will be $6 an hour, roughly.
Now, whether you're a fast food worker on minimum wage, or a carpenter pulling in $20/hour, your employer will have to pay an extra $6/hour to offer you insurance.
First, this means that we can look forward to seeing higher numbers of unemployment, right? For a few reasons:
One, someone working for $8/hour will really be costing the employer $14/hour, so that's nearly double the cost with the same production. How can employers afford to keep people on staff?
Two, the extra $6 per hour per employee is ONLY the cost of insurance. Let us not forget that, under Obama, most of these business owners are going to be paying more taxes anyway.
If you're an employer, paying people fairly to work and taking advantage of group-rate insurance, how does this help/hurt you? Your taxes are going up, but heck, you knew that. And now you have to drop what you have, get gvt-mandated insurance for $240 per employee per working week, and still have to turn a large enough profit to not go out of business once higher inflation rates and "green" standards set in.
Does this proposed increase of employer spending mean the surefire death of small and big (private) business alike? Heck, even Wal-Mart would take a hefty, hefty hit! Look for their "Always Low Prices" slogan to change to, "We're Not THAT Expensive!"
4 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
6 Jul 09
Where did you find these figures? Almost $1,000 a month per person in government mandated insurance premiums? I find that extremely hard to believe so I'd like to read whatever it is that you read.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
6 Jul 09
The $6/hour is something I watched on a discussion on the morning news. I think they got that figure from the actual cost of the plan and the subsequent taxing of the healthcare plan. So, in total, the pundit's guest (I forget who it was... I'll check YouTube) figured the amount up to be $6/hour IF the admin's currently proposed plan goes through.
As far as the higher taxes for business owners and inflation rates and whatnot, that comes from stuff I've read all over since Obama was still running for president: Politico, CNN, etc. Not to mention Obama said it himself: a return to higher taxes for $250,000+ (which, let's get real, will eventually HAVE to be $50,000 lol)
Even if it ends up being just half that total ($6/hour), employers are still in for some very rough times. And if you don't have job security tighter than a frog's a$$, forget about it! You're on the bread lines.
And I forget to even mention unemployment insurance employers have to pay. I haven't heard anything about those rates. I'll get to checking.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
6 Jul 09
I guess what I'm not understanding is what is supposed to happen to the insurance giants under this plan? Do they cease to exist? That wouldn't make sense, especially considering that the government just bailed out AIG insurance. I know what my former employer paid per employee for Blue Cross/Blue Shield because I handled the benefits and it was way less than $6 per person so does this mean that current contracts with insurance carriers will cease to exist and new rate increases will replace them? That's not government run healthcare, that's still private industry healthcare, so what reason could there be for the increase?
"And I forget to even mention unemployment insurance employers have to pay. I haven't heard anything about those rates. I'll get to checking."
Employers already contribute to unemployment insurance under Futa (Federal) and SUTA (State) payroll taxes or, in the case of the railroad industry, the Railroad Retirement Board.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
6 Jul 09
Ok, I don't pretend to have all of the answers but this is what I know. If you already have insurance through your job nothing will change. Some employers who don't currently offer insurance to their employees will have to start...like Walmart, for instance, who considers most of their employees as part-time, keeping their hours under 40 per week so they don't have to offer them insurance coverage. But, they will be able to purchase insurance at group rates just like any other business does. Small businesses with less than "X" number of employees will be exempt. The major insurance carriers aren't going to raise their rates because of this because I would imagine that they will all be trying to attract these new customers.
Here in Florida we have a state run homeowner's insurance plan for folks who can't get homeowner's insurance with a regular insurance company. I believe that the government is looking at something like that for folks who don't have health insurance through their jobs because their employer is too small, or because they are unemployed or self employed. Individuals will most likely have to pay for this insurance but it's not likely to cost the amount of money per month that you mentioned in your discussion. Buying individual insurance from one of the major carriers would cost much less than that so it would be a wasted program. Also, poor people can't afford a high insurance premium so it would defeat the purpose of healthcare reform to price the most needy out of the program.
"And I know employers already contribute to unemployment insurance. My point: Those rates will probably go up as well, as we experience more unemployment or just because employers will be considered "able" to pay more."
I don't see any logical reason for an employer's FUTA or SUTA contributions to increase because collecting unemployment benefits is a limited time safety net. As more people become unemployed, more people also stop receiving benefits as they expire. Keep in mind, too, that employers make these contributions the entire time someone is employed by them but that employee only collects unemployment benefits for around 6 months and that's only if he/she was employed long enough. I was with my last employer for over 2 years before my position was cut so my employer put much more into the program than I took out.
@katran (585)
• United States
8 Jul 09
First of all, there are multiple health care plans that are/will be floating around out there. There is not one big plan that everyone is collaborating on that is headed up by Obama himself. That is just not the way things work.
Second, all the health care plans that exist are in such early stages of planning that I don't know how anyone possibly could have gotten as specific a number as $6/hour already. Additionally, that number would have to be different depending on the company or the insurance provider.
Third, why would health insurance premiums be paid according to the number of hours worked by the employee? Health insurance is usually (as far as I know) based on a monthly per-person rate. Measuring health insurance like it is an hourly wage makes no sense.
Fourth, I am pretty sure that employers would not be forced to cover ALL their employees, because some employees will choose to buy their own more comprehensive insurance plans, just as they sometimes do now. I am not sure about that though. That is simply what I think will happen.
@katran (585)
• United States
8 Jul 09
Well, that's not entirely true. When the health care plans start getting finishes and the legislation starts running through Congress, you can actually get on the US Congress website and read the legislation. Then, if we don't like it, we should call and email our congressmen to let them know. I never watch the news on TV to get my information anymore. Facts are optional with them.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
8 Jul 09
Sounds about like me. A lot of thinking, not enough knowing.
That's what scares me.
Nobody's gonna "know" until it's here.
@dogsnme (1264)
• United States
15 Jul 09
I think your post said it well. It's a nice thought that everyone will be gauranteed healthcare. But for all practical reasons it's impossible to manage. Not to mention the fact that it's not the job of the U.S. government to make such provisions. That's what socialist governments do. We're not Socialist. At least I thought we weren't. I also saw recently on the news that there was a bill in the works that would make it legal for the government to fine any American 1000 dollars if they refuse the government provided healthcare. Sounds like the end of freedom to me. The whole reason the healthcare system is a mess now is because of government interference. And now they want to give everyone healthcare and make everything all right. It just doesn't work that way.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
16 Jul 09
It just doesn't. It just can't. America is a different machine, not meant to run on 10-W socialism. We'll lock up.
Thanks for responding. :-)
@meandmy3 (2227)
• United States
6 Jul 09
Here I was thinking I was the only one that had done the math on this. Seriously people wake up and smell the coffee. this is not going to help America, it is not going to help the working class, it is going to hurt us. There will be fewer jobs as every job will cost the employer more money and those that are working will be working harder to do the job of more than one person. As again companies will have to have let others go to make up for the additional cost of hiring people.
Everything will go up, as companies will have to increase prices in order to maintain their profit margin, answer to stock holders etc. This is not going to benefit us in any way.
Lets not even start on what this is going to do to our levels of health care and what is provided to us. You may need open heart surgery but guess what you are on a list because that is how it is done now and when we pull your name off of the list you can have your surgery, or procedure etc, lets hope you make it that long.