Dumped at the vet
By TheRealDawn
@dawnald (85146)
Shingle Springs, California
July 7, 2009 3:13pm CST
Last year when I was fostering kittens, our veterinarian told us a story. Somebody had boarded a cat with him. Within an hour or so, the cat was coughing and/or sneezing and the vet isolated the cat and tried to get in contact with the owner. The person had given false information. The other cats he was boarding all got sick and the cat the had been abandoned died. For weeks afterward, he was providing free care to the pets that had been infected. Now maybe this person couldn't afford care and thought they were being humane to the poor cat, but it ended up that he put other animals at risk, he put the vet's reputation at risk and he wasted a lot of the vet's money. Surely there was a humane society or somebody who could have helped him out. Sheesh...
8 people like this
17 responses
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
7 Jul 09
Unfortunatly nobody wants to help in that situation. I once found a kitten who was dying from anemia due to fleas. I brought it in the house and called a vet to see what could be done, they said nothing... let it die. I called all sorts of places asking for advice, or at least to be pointed in the direction of someone who would help, I got the same answer each time... nothing can be done, let it die. And we think we're better than savage beasts??
6 people like this
@rmorefield (941)
• United States
7 Jul 09
It seems to me that they would have told you to first get rid of the fleas and then treat the anemia with either an iron supplement or red meat....or both.
3 people like this
@finlander60 (1804)
• United States
13 Jul 09
We found a young cat in our yard who had LOTS OF FLEAS, and was emaciated. I went and got a flea killer for small, young cats. We cleaned her up and figured that would be the end of her problem. WRONG. Early the next morning, we were awakened by her having convulsions. We washed off all the flea killer with Dawn Dish soap and fed her milk through an eyedropper, for quite a while. We wrapped her in a soft terrycloth towel until we knew our Veterinarian would be open, and we brought her in. I explained to her what had happened and she told me that the stuff we used had attacked her nervous system and that our treatment was just what was needed and that we probably saved her life. We are very happy that she came to us at the right time, and she is a very happy cat to this day. This happened several years ago.
1 person likes this
@savypat (20216)
• United States
7 Jul 09
This is a bigger problem that you would think, people kind hearted take in a stray, the stray spreads illness to their cats, then their only choice is to watch their cats die or pay tremendous Vet bills. On top of that some of these feline viruses get in the soil or the carpet and can last for years. When we take in a stray we keep it in a special room until we can get it sent out to the proper place or find a home for it if it's healthy. The shelter we work with is very strict about health questions. The confine new cats for 14 days at least.
5 people like this
@scarlet_woman (23463)
• United States
8 Jul 09
ah,the poor kitty.how awful.
i guess maybe the guy couldn't afford it and thought the vet would save him if he dropped him there.chances are he didn't even think of contagion.
one of my prior cats came home from the vet with kennel cough and spread it to a second cat..i was not happy about that.thankfully it was treatable,however.
@scarlet_woman (23463)
• United States
8 Jul 09
i know..if it were something like FeLv..
2 people like this
@mcat19 (1357)
• United States
8 Jul 09
That's how we got Peaches. She was abandoned at a vet's office. I think the reason for her abandonment was inappropriate peeing. We had her transported to us. She has suffered terribly from her 7 months in a cage. She doesn't like to be picked up, talked to or touched. She has gotten a better about the petting and talking to, but will bite if picked up. She does pee inappropriately at times, but she now has a forever home come what may. We love her dearly, and she, in her own way, loves us, too.
3 people like this
@rmorefield (941)
• United States
7 Jul 09
I do not think that the person handled the situation well. However, maybe they knew that something was wrong with the cat and thought that the vet's office was the best place for it to be. If they had taken it to a shelter, it would have immediately been killed. I think that the vet needs to stop whining. It is his job to treat animals. No matter whether he could have gotten in touch with the owner or not, the other animals would have gotten sick anyway. And he would have still had to provide free care to them. I think that the person honestly loved the cat and tried very hard for it to have a fighting chance at life.
4 people like this
@dawnald (85146)
• Shingle Springs, California
7 Jul 09
I almost always hire a pet sitter also. The one exception was when I had a cat on antibiotics and this cat was 1) impossible for somebody who he didn't know to catch and 2) even more impossible to give medicine too. So I did board him.
2 people like this
@rmorefield (941)
• United States
7 Jul 09
I agree with you on that. But it is still the vet's responsibility to check on the health of the animal before it is boarded. Even if the person had given correct information, the germs were already in the air when the vet tried to contact him/her. No matter what, the other animals would have gotten sick. That is why I never board my animals...I always hire a pet sitter that is willing to come to my house and take care of my dogs when I am away.
3 people like this
@rmorefield (941)
• United States
7 Jul 09
I can completely understand having to board for medical reasons. I have had that incident also.
I am not trying to sound like I am taking sides. So please don't think that. I understand the vet's point of view and the person's. Having worked at a vet's office (that also provided boarding), I know that sometimes things happen that can't be foreseen. One day, a girl brought in a feral cat that she had decided to take into her home. Thankfully, she brought him in for a complete work-up. The doctor decided to keep him for a couple of days so that he could have all of his vaccinations and be neutered. Well, while he was there, hit bit the s### out of me. His three days turned into ten because he had to be observed for rabies since he bit me. And I had to go to the hospital and have the complete rabies series. It turned out that he did, in fact, have the disease. If she had no brought him in, he could have infected her and her other animals. I am not sure if she had children or not, but in any case, it would have been disasterous. But at least I am now rabies free!! LOL.
4 people like this
@Loen210 (1540)
• United States
9 Jul 09
Oh how sad. Poor, poor cat who had been abandoned. And very poor boarding animals too. Goodness, imaging this situation I am feeling for everybody there and involved at all. The vet must have been on the end with stress as well as anger, but (hopefully) tugging at the heart from sorrow for the poor cat who was orphaned, left. I know even my dear cats are soooo upset when they have the slightest hint (and they know every time) that it's time for their trip to the vet. And the overnight stays are extremely sparse, but only if they have some major treatment needed, etc.
But since I skimmed through some of the other replies, I suppose I can't make any firm of what-should-have-been, even more as we don't know the full situation on either of the sides.
If I could not afford treating my dear cats, I would bow down and ask family and friends to help out at all. If I can not handle adopting or taking in a stray, then I would bring it to the local vet first to see if they would take in for adoption, or only if no other way, take them to a shelter that guarantees that they will NOT put them to sleep if not adopted.
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
7 Jul 09
Oh wow, that was just wrong!
It's great that they wanted the cat to get care that they couldn't afford themselves, but to be deceitful and lie about it totally negates any good intentions that they may have had.
Sometimes people just don't think - and those people don't need to be pet owners (nor have kids!).
3 people like this
@strawberrybaby39 (2086)
• United States
11 Jul 09
That is sad when someone does that to an animal. That was nice of the vet to do in taking care of the other animals for free. That wasn't right out of that person to do. She could have killed all the other pets that got infected. I mean they all got sick to thanks to her. I bet that vet spent a lot of money taking care of the other animals that where infected.
2 people like this
@strawberrybaby39 (2086)
• United States
12 Jul 09
I am sure he did have to do that to keep his customers or he would have lots them. Even though it wasn't his fault. If that person wouldn't have done that he wouldn't have been in that situation.
2 people like this
@Anora_Eldorath (6028)
• United States
9 Jul 09
Dawn-
It's a very sad tale, but the truth is if the cat had gone to the humane society and been ill, they would have put it down, not wasted money trying to make it better. At least the cat was able to die with some dignity at the Vet's office. Indeed, I agree that the person should have told the Vet they could not afford to put it down, treat it or what not and the Vet may have been able to handle it quickly without infecting the other cats. I have to wonder what the cat had though to spread that quickly. I'm not a Vet, so I have no idea what feline disease would transmit that quickly.
I simply wish we had more Vets out there willing to do what was needed, instead of the issues we currently have. Most people won't get cats or dogs from their shelters. And if they do go, they want puppies and kittens. That's just the way of things from what I've heard from those who work for the one locally.
Namaste-Anora
2 people like this
@dawnald (85146)
• Shingle Springs, California
9 Jul 09
I was volunteering for a no kill cat rescue for about a year (they haven't called me in 3 months, hmmm, must follow up on that) and sure, more people want kittens, but they had a pretty good success rate with older cats too.
But yep, I do wish there were more alternatives for people.
1 person likes this
@my_name_is_coco (4333)
• Philippines
8 Jul 09
aww poor kitty!these people,I don't understand why they get pets when they can't really take care of them.getting a pet is like raising a child.you have to look after their needs,physically and emotionally.if that person only look into the cat's medical condition,it would have been saved,no other cats would've gotten infected and the vet would have never spent a lot of money.
3 people like this
@jugsjugs (12967)
•
8 Jul 09
I feel very sad to think someone has done this and like you say it made alot of other pets ill which was not fair to their owners and so much distress to those animals.It only takes one irrisponsible person though shame they have not got the owner and prosecuted.
2 people like this
@inkstainedheart (455)
• United States
7 Jul 09
Aw, those poor cats! If you can't afford to take care of your pet when it is sick, then why do you have a pet at all? I waited on getting a cat of my own because I knew I wouldn't be able to afford the vet bills for shots and getting fixed. I'm glad I waited until I did--not only did I get a great pet, I know I can take care of him if he gets sick or injured.
3 people like this
@Elaine77 (315)
• China
13 Jul 09
How could this man do something to his pet like this, I have three cats, one of them comes from my family member, the other two are street cats, they are all healthy. How could someone raise cats without giving them certain extent of medical care, it's mean.
2 people like this
@nancyrowina (3850)
•
14 Jul 09
It does seem like a strange way to get your cat seen by a vet when there must be charities that can help in situations like that. I wonder if it was some kind of trick by a rival vet who was trying to put him out of business or something, as surely if you cared enough about your cat to get it treated and couldn't afford the vaet you'd be up front about the cat being ill from the start?
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85146)
• Shingle Springs, California
14 Jul 09
I would think that there would be agencies.
@kirstinmomof2 (63)
• United States
8 Jul 09
You would think someone would help but everyone wants money and a lot of it. If it wasn't so costly to take carwe of animals you wouldn't hear of this. The humane society can put your animals down but still at a high cost.