harry potter
By bhojarajan
@bhojarajan (88)
India
July 16, 2009 10:42am CST
Which of the three young Harry Potter actors, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson or Rupert Grint, do you think will have more professional success in adult life?
7 responses
@Improbability (140)
• United States
16 Jul 09
Dan is going to be typecast. I think there's almost no getting around that. It'd be between the other two, and I'd say probably Rupert, but I'm not sure there's a great reason for that. I like Emma more, but from what I've heard in the past, Rupert is considered a better actor.
And besides when Dan = Luke, Emma = Leia, and Rupert = Han, it's a sure thing Rupert will be the next Indiana Jones!
1 person likes this
@pupupd (1515)
• India
16 Jul 09
I think rupert grint will have more success because I find his acting very entertaining, he really has that acting talent within him. He can act in variety of genres like romance, comedy, action, thrillers etc.
Where as daniel can act only in serious roles, according to me.
Emma can act in more action movies.
@Improbability (140)
• United States
16 Jul 09
I don't know... have you seen HBP yet? Dan has some very funny moments. Especially when he's taken the liquid luck. Oh man, we were all laughing...
@bjjunqiang (50)
• China
18 Jul 09
I like all these three actors.May they all can achieve their goals and get professional success in their adult life.
@gorgeouslydone (14)
• Philippines
17 Jul 09
i think it would be emma watson, coz she's not only enriching herself in the silver-screen industry, she's also investing on her educational background. she came from a very decent family (not that the other two are not), she's very flexible and very charming. i see more potential in her than the two guys, but of course, i love the three of them equally. :)