Fighting Hunger in the United States

As a temporary solution to the problem food for the hungry should be maintain as a current resort. As the economy started to bounce back, the government focus should stick to economic development. Feeding forever the hungry is a bad solution and would only teach people to depend and becomes lazy. Teaching them livelihood even to start at a little funding. Makes a hungry people learn to feed their selves. Lot of investors equates job creation.

A&B good both, but if only A, the government can support for long time, it use a lot of money budget, poeple will not work. For B i think ,it is good but in action everybody will have jobs or not and will support people to work and people have oputunity to be rise money than A.In B, the best answer for me.

i think both should be applied and C. should be a requirement to further education for poor that have the ability to learn and the ambition now that they are older, but they have no money to put toward education. it shouldnt be so hard or be any expense to a person to go back to school if they have help doing so.

I will choose B as a better way.Although funding programs or other programs will help,they can not solve problems of all poor people.We must come out with a permanent way to keep people away from hunger threats.Today in some regions of China,we still face severe hunger problems.Some fund given by the government or donated by warm-hearted people can help poor area fight hunger temporarily.However,when encountered with natural disasters,like droughts or floods,the food output is not enough and hunger problems arise again. So from my point of view,we should create a stronger economy and create more job opportunities.Also it is very necessary to promote agriculture modernization and to attach more importance to the science and technology innovation of agriculture.I think this is a more effective way to fight hunger for all human beings,not only in USA and China,but all over the world.

I would pick C. I believe that the government should fund poor peoples education and now just hand them an easy way out. Since poor people usual accept the easy way out instead of fight against the odds. I grew up having to fight against odds and I've never complained once about my family and my own lifestyle misfortunes. I believe if the government can create more fundings like in CA the educational system is slowly getting screwed over. If that gets screwed over the poor people can't get out of their status because education is no longer offered to them. My answer would be my own.