is lcd monitor more better than the crt moniter why???
By vichuz
@vichuz (27)
India
July 20, 2009 10:25am CST
i think that lcd moniter consumes less electricity but they cannot be able to view at all the angles but crt moniter consumes more elctricity and can be view at any angles
3 responses
@nilayparikh89 (40)
• India
20 Jul 09
Lcd monitors offers you viewing angle of 160 degrees which is enough for all pratical purposes, so view angle is not a major concern in LCD nowadays as it was before.
LCDs have fast reponse time then CRT monitors which is very crucial for gamers and movie buffs.Respone time refers to the updating of the pixel colours.Ghosting and trailing effects starts when respone time is less.
One of the most annoying things on the CRT monitors was of the Screen flickers, in other words the low refresh rates. This contributes towards headaches which users experienced on adaily basis. This aspect was also responsible for the lower productivity.Normally CRT monitors offers you refresh rates of 60 HZ but LCD monitors offers you 72 Hz, which is minimum refresh rates to avoid eye strain.
LCD have 80% less weight then CRT monitors and consumes less electricity then CRT monitors, 15 inch LCD screen consumes about 25-50 watts whereas CRT consumes 60-80 watts.
SO,LCDs are better then CRT monitors........
@nilayparikh89 (40)
• India
21 Jul 09
A quality LCDs gives you the view angle of 160 degree and i think thats sufficient even if you are not satisfied then buy plasma monitors it gives you the view angle of 180 degree...
@lovedude (4447)
• India
22 Jul 09
This question is actually much less valid than it was several years ago. Many companies have cut the production of CRT monitors except for the extremely high end and the very low end. In fact, most desktop computer systems sold now by default come with LCD monitors. Still for those that what to know the difference and which they would be better off purchasing, I have updated this article to be more relevant to the current technologies and products offered today.
CRTs
The primary advantage that CRT monitors held over LCDs was their color rendering. The contrast ratios and depths of colors displayed were much greater with CRT monitors than LCDs. While this still holds true in most cases, many strides have been made in LCDs such that this difference is not as great as it once was. Many graphic designers still use the very expensive large CRT monitors in their work because of the color advantages. Of course, this color ability does degrade over time as the phosphors in the tube break down.
The other advantage that CRT monitors held over LCD screens is the ability to easily scale to various resolutions. This is referred to as multisync by the industry. By adjusting the electron beam in the tube, the screen can easily be adjusted downward to lower resolutions while keeping the picture clarity intact.
While these two items may play an important role for CRT monitors, there are disadvantages as well. The biggest of these are the size and weight of the tubes. An equivalent sized LCD monitor is upwards of 80% smaller in size and weight compared to a CRT tube. The larger the screen, the bigger the size difference. The other major drawback deals with the power consumption. The energy needed for the electron beam means that the monitors consumer and generate a lot more heat than the LCD monitors.
Pros:
* Multisync Capable
* High Refresh Rates
* Color Clarity and Depth
Cons:
* Very Heavy and Large
* Use Large Amounts of Energy
* Generate Excess Heat
LCDs
The biggest advantage to LCD monitors is their size and weight. As was mentioned earlier, the size and weight of an LCD monitor can be upwards of 80% lighter than an equivalent dimension CRT screen. This makes it possible to users to have larger screens for their computers than was possible before.
LCD screens also tend to produce less eye fatigue to the user. The constant light barrage and scan lines of a CRT tube tend to cause strain on heavy computer users. The lower intensity of the LCD monitors coupled with their constant screen display of pixels being on or off produces less fatigue for the user.
The most notable disadvantage to LCD screens is their fixed or native resolution. An LCD screen can only display the number of pixels in its matrix and no more or less. It can display a lower resolution in one of two ways. Using only a fraction of the total pixels on the display or through extrapolation. Extrapolation is a method whereby the monitor blends multiple pixels together to simulate a single smaller pixel. This can often lead to a blurry or fuzzy image particularly with text when running the screen below is native resolution.
Video was problematic with early LCD monitors because of lower response times. This has been overcome by many improvements, but there are some that still have low response times. Purchasers should be aware of this when purchasing a monitor. However, the improvements are often work arounds that can actually lead to another problem of reduced color clarity. Unfortunately, the industry is very poor about properly listing the specifications for monitors to help buyers understand and compare monitors.
Pros:
* Smaller and Lighter
* Energy Efficient
* Causes Less Eye Fatigue
Cons:
* Blurry Images Outside Native Resolution
* Motion Blur on Fast Moving Images
* Some Models Have Reduced Color Clarity
Conclusions
At this point and time, most consumers will likely be purchasing LCD monitors over CRTs. There is almost no difference in the cost to consumers thanks to production improvements in LCDs and the reduction in the production of CRTs. Typically CRTs will only be seen sold with the least expensive of desktop computer systems or by those with special imaging needs such as graphics and medical professionals.
Courtesy :
http://compreviews.about.com/od/multimedia/a/CRTvsLCD.htm
@tony_terance (219)
• India
21 Jul 09
First and most important advantage is reduction in size and easy to carry and handle.It have some advantage like reduction in emission in x-ray compared to crt