Would you allow your children to explore and study other religions?

@eileenleyva (27560)
Philippines
July 25, 2009 3:15am CST
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing - so the saying goes. But would you still allow your children to explore and study other religions. Let us say that the children are at an impressionable age of 16, 17, or 18.
2 people like this
15 responses
@raynejasper (2322)
• Philippines
25 Jul 09
..hi.. for me, yes.. But I have to caution them that all religions are different and that in every religion, there will always be weaknesses.. no religion is ever perfect.. and I have to make it clear to them that religion is not the way to go to heaven (I believe in heaven).. It is our own personal relationship with God.. that's why I myself don't believe in religions preaching that their religion is the real one because I never encountered any religion in the Bible that God designated as the true one.. It's not bad to explore so that they will know where they want to fit in..
2 people like this
• Montreal, Quebec
25 Jul 09
Couldnt have said it better myself
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Probably you have to reread the Bible in its entirety. I am doing so right now. I am still in Esther. I read slow because of my eyes. But if I remember right, somewhere in the gospel, Christ Himself instituted religion. I will read and tell you. Buzz me up one time in the far future, ha ha.
@dreamr802 (985)
• United States
1 Nov 09
I think when I have children I will allow them to learn about other religions...I don't want them to be ignorant of other religions and what they believe. I was born and raised Lutheran and my dad's side of the family is Catholic...so I know both of those religions very well...and of course I would want my children to stay within the Christianity faith because that was how I was raised...but in the end when they are out of my house and no longer having me pay for them, they are free to do as they please as long as it doesn't hurt anyone...When I was that age, I was fascinated in learning about other religions and that didn't sway me from Lutheran at all...I think a lot of it has to do with how the children are raised...
1 person likes this
• United States
8 Nov 09
I'm not offended at all. I grew up mainly Lutheran, I was baptized and had my 1st communion and confirmation in Lutheranism. My religion is called Lutheran because it was based off of Martin Luther (he's the one that nailed the 95 Theses to a catholic church in the 1400's). It was one of the first forms of Protestant religion.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
7 Nov 09
Why is your religion called Lutheran? Sorry I had to ask but I really do not know? Why did you choose it over Catholicism? I hope you are not offended by my questions?
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
9 Nov 09
I did get to study Martin Luther and Protestantism back in college. I think he has grounds for protesting back then because the Catholic Church was in turmoil. But the protestations are not applicable now, I think. The Catholic Church had gotten its act together. Maybe your dad's side of the family will smile if you bond with them.
@GADHISUNU (2162)
• India
2 Nov 09
I would. But before that I must be reasonably certain that they knew their religion very well. But by the time they have a good grasp of their own religion they would have grown into adults! So, as for me the question doesn't arise. By the time they learn their religion and also understand it they must be on their own as far as assimilating knowledge is concerned. Now, if I want to understand your question to mean say, my young child[aged about 10] visiting another friend of hers who might be, say, a Christian and she happens to atay over while they are in prayers, and they give her their prayer book to follow the prayer and encourage her to participate, I wouldn't mind if she does for she is after all praying to God. A well brought up child must be past what could be called an impressionable age by 16,17, or 18. If one has to think that by 16/18 a child does not know her religion well enough, then it is possible that the parents themselves were not serious about religion or took the children for granted.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
7 Nov 09
16, 17, 18 are just about the ages when children try to defy their beliefs, authorities, the law, and yes, even parents.
@phildozer (284)
• United States
25 Jul 09
Its better that they do something that theyre truly passionate about, rather that just pay lip service to the church that they have inherited from you. Its natural for teens around this age to start to question what theyve been told for so many years, and chances are if you allow them to explore their options, they will either find one that they can find harmony with, or they will realize that the religion that you chose is truly the best fit for them
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Hi phildozer, we would not have become adults had we not gone to some extensive study about the facts of life. More or less, we know already what is in store for our children had they, say, choose to dwell a little longer on one teaching. They, in their impressionable age, can be persuaded to embrace another faith. Adults are supposed to be guides. The children are our responsibility.
• United States
26 Jul 09
You do have a very quick wit charlie, but I think we both know that those two issue are hardly interchangable. Think about it like you would a career. If your father groomed you to take over his store one day when he retired, you would probably be overjoyed that your father has taken such an interest in your well being, however what if running this store did not make you happy? what if doing what your father did, didnt fulfill your needs to grow and experience life. Surely you wouldnt want your kids perhaps resenting you for not allowing them to discover the world on their own.
1 person likes this
@OceanLady (136)
• Canada
1 Aug 09
I believe it is wrong for anyone to force their kids into their religion, or to ban them from studying other religions. I think it is everyone's civil duty to study other religions and cultures, because so much conflict could be resolved if we just understood each other. I was always free to explore other religions, and I followed a few before finding my own path... and I ended up doing just that. I do not follow one religion, I do not claim to believe every word in any given text, and I don't go around saying that my path is the only path... but I take everything I have learned and follow what makes sense. I have been researching religions since I was 14, just out of curiosity, and adopting whatever beliefs make sense to me. I believe that everyone has slightly different beliefs, everyone has a slightly different outlook, and it doesn't make sense to go around claiming that you believe every single word in a given book, or follow everything you are told. I just don't think it's right. Everyone should have a chance to see other people's views, and form their own. Mind you, it does pose a bit of a dillema when someone asks me what religion I follow... I usually just say I'm not religious, because it takes a couple hours to properly explain my religion ^^;
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
4 Aug 09
Hi Oceanlady! What makes sense to one isn't exactly sensible to others. The intelligence of a person might be greater or lesser than the other. Probably you understand more so you are able to take things as they relate to you. But what we believe in maketh our character, don't you think? Even the great men of the past adhere to certain beliefs that enabled them to move towards the right path. Usually, we have goals in life... the Zen Buddhists want to come full circle, the Muslims want to serve Allah, the Christians want to meet God... At one point in our lives, we have to make a stand about the choices we made. We have to fulfill that goal.
• Canada
4 Aug 09
Yes, but in order for us to stand up for our choices, we need to be given the opportunity to make those choices. Many people aren't. They grow up thinking that the ways they were taught are the only ways that exist, and I think that is wrong.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
6 Aug 09
Guidance is the responsibility of the adults, especially if the children are intellectually or emotionally deficient. That is why parents are there to take care of the young. If the children mature early on, well and good. But if they remain impressionable at 18, legal age or not, the parents know what is best.
@veronizm (907)
• Philippines
30 Oct 09
Hi eileen! Yes of course :) I wouldn't want them to be deprived of such knowledge. Religion is a very interesting subject and almost all religions around the world, most especially the well-established ones, are based on the teachings of love and peace and harmony with mankind and the good of humanity. But before that, I have to make it sure first that they are well-indoctrinated with their current religion. I also would supervise them, in order to help them understand certain conflicts of principles. I'm honestly not that worried if my child would convert to another religion, just as long as it's a well-established one, and not one of those obviously fake ones who just use religion as means for acquiring money.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
30 Oct 09
You are very broadminded. I am sure you would be able to integrate all the good values of the great philosophies to your offspring.
• Germany
25 Jul 09
I would appreciate if they would study other religions. When I was in the mentioned age my Roman Catholic church dominated all my religious understandings, but didn't give me real answers. Nowadays my children learn "ethics" at school instead of "Roman Catholic lessons". But they don't really take advantage of this broader spectrum; focus goes to the materialistic aspects of this world rather than the spiritual mission in life.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Hi constaanta. Ethics blend well with some of the religions ever propagated. That dwells on human code of conduct.
@Chispa514 (871)
• Montreal, Quebec
25 Jul 09
I would, simply because of the fact that I was brought up with the expression "you learn from your mistakes". I was born and raised a catholic, and there's alot of times I wanted to change religion because there was things that catholics believe in that i don't agree with, and other religions seemed "better' in a sense. My parents allowed me to search within myself and decide if I wanted to stay a catholic or convert to something else. I have since decided to stay a catholic, but if my children wish to study other religions and see if taht's what better suits their personality, then I'll be fine with it, as long as they don't come with the thinking that one religion is better than another and try to force their views down anyone's throat so to speak.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Your search must have taught you something that kept you in Catholicism. Would you tell that to your children?
• United States
25 Jul 09
Yes, I would allow it. I have gone to catholic schools all my life. But because my parents weren't devout catholics, the religion was not forced upon me. That made me open-minded to learning about other religions. Exploring is not a bad thing. It actually makes our children more aware and knowledgeable about what's out there. It makes them not be so close-minded, like saying that "my religion is the right religion". I think we all should be given a choice as to what religion we want to follow, that is, unless it has cultic influences. I, myself, have tried to learn about Buddhism and Taoism, even New Age. But it has brought me full circle and now I am a Christian.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Many times, the search and the approach to one's study do not actually lead to the right track. The cult could be powerful. What if the child stops there? What if the child is not intelligent enough?
• United States
29 Jul 09
I'd rather my children wait at least until college to study other religions. I'd want them to be well grounded in the faith I profess before their minds get cluttered with a lot of other beliefs. Younger children don't have the requisite understanding of these things to be discerning enough.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
30 Jul 09
I will go with your reasoning. Very tact.
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
31 Oct 09
No...I allow only to read the bible not to study all religion. Because the bible itself teach the importance of religion and guide us what is the real religion to belong with? God and our Lord Jesus Christ, teach us on what religion we must to belong to be save. Not others say they are real but don't know what God, said and wisdom...Most teacher of religion base only on their opinion not in the bible...Like priest they are not reading bible but they talk more about their own knowledge...
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
3 Nov 09
I'm a catholic and never see priest reading the bible when they conduct masses. They have their own pamphlets but I don't know some of churches of catholic if they use the bible as their basis in their masses but as i noted was that they are only say what they think not base on the bible that Is why am not active being a catholic because as I read the bible there are many practice of catholic church that is against the teaching of the Bible...I always ask in my mind why they teach the real words from the bible? That is why I say they are not reading the bible because they cannot teach what the bible say...Did you ask that for yourself?
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
7 Nov 09
aerous, the priests read the Bible all right. If only you attend masses, you would see that they read the Gospel loud and clear. Then they proceed to explain the story in the homily or the sermon. In my place, the priests even join the laity in Bible studies. As to the Catholic practices, I have not seen one yet that is erroneous. Everything that I do has biblical basis. And yes, I am in the process of reading the Bible in its entirety. Currently on Maccabees. Am a slow reader. What book are you in now?
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
31 Oct 09
But don't you think you are impeding knowledge? And why attack a priest and say he is not reading the Bible? How do you know?
@krajibg (11922)
• Guwahati, India
25 Jul 09
Hi, 16, 17, 18 are quite ripe age and children are much comprehensive these days. Hence allowing them to explore other language and study as well would be most reasonable venture.
@krajibg (11922)
• Guwahati, India
29 Jul 09
Oh sorry, it was a lapse change it to 'religion' please.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Ooops, I meant religion.
1 person likes this
@rayapol (17)
• Philippines
27 Jul 09
Yes, its always be a part of there growing to study more about religion. It is just like learning history when you explore to study religions. It is better then for them to study but you we have to guide them.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
1 Aug 09
Yes.
@rjackson (28)
• United States
26 Jul 09
Rather you allow them to are not, kids will be kids. It's not what they do when they are around you that gets them in trouble, but what they do when you are not around. The Bible says train up a child in the way that he should go and he will not depart. This is so true, I grew up going to a Pentecostal church, I have studied other things in the past, but the {ebntecostal way sticks in my head. It's ok for them to stidy other things, because it maybe God's way of putting a person that knows the way, into a lost church, it may be a saviour in the midst.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
28 Jul 09
Okay.
• United States
8 Nov 09
Yes, i would let them think for themselves. If they found something that was better for them and bot hurting anyone then they should be happy. Who is to say your own thinking is the one and only way and force them to do something that might not be right for them.