Would u rather be in a serious DROUGHT..or would u rather be FLOODED?
By April
@cloud_kicker_32 (4635)
United States
July 27, 2009 6:11am CST
I was wondering with all the drought in alot of places and all the flodding..and in this question..im talkin cars almost burined in water..not just a rain all the time..i really dotnknwo whats worse but i think id go with drought..they can bring in water for help..but all those forest fires..diff question..sooo would u rather..drought or flood?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@twoey68 (13627)
• United States
27 Jul 09
Definately drought...you can always buy water in the stores but dealing with flooding is a nightmare. With flooding all you can do is leave...at least in a drought, for the most part, you can just stay where you are.
[b]~~AT PEACE WITHIN~~
**STAND STRONG IN YOUR BELIEFS**[/b]
2 people like this
@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
3 Jan 12
I think I would rather be in a drought. I know neither is a really good choice, but floods are more dangerous, personally I think. Although I think droughts can be more communally devastating. And also I think it's easier to put out a fire than a flood. So, my choice is flood.
@Mayuko (1268)
• United States
2 Jan 12
I would rather be in a drought rather than a flood. Both cause damage, but floods directly cause deaths. Also, floods are more costly for people and the government, but a drought would be expensive for less people. And finally, a flood destroy houses, cars, and buildings. A drought would only destroy crops.
