Is Windows XP more reliable than Windows 2000?
By naeemasad
@naeemasad (231)
Pakistan
November 13, 2006 4:29am CST
I think Windows XP is more relibale, as it provides you the better security and easy in use.
1 response
@brentjh (677)
• Namibia
13 Nov 06
mmm... a good question. I personaly think that Win2K was more secure, but I have to agree on the reliability of XP. If you use XP for users and 2003 servers in a domain environment then the security of XP is better than just on it's own. You can then also enforce cool policy's on the XP machines so the users can't stuff around and mess things up. I love this!
