Do u think manufacturers would prevent a new invention coming into market?

@vandana7 (100302)
India
August 20, 2009 8:14am CST
Most of the time manufacturers have a lot of money invested in their manufacturing units. They spare little for research and development. If there is any discovery they are looking for, they would be looking at it in the direction that does not disturb their existing profits. Under these circumstances, do u think that if a person was to come up with a new technology, would they allow it to reach the market in say less than an year, even if it were to be more green, and more efficient, requiring less maintenance, and more convenient. I am referring to some television program in which they showed new types of automated battery operated cars for travel within the cities that would be neatly interlinked through computer program, and could be hired through mobiles. That way parking, and maintenance problems would be virtually nil, and each vehicle would be optimally utilized. There were other interesting prototypes shown as well. Do u think that will reach the market by 2011? Will all car manufacturers and ancillary industries stop their existing products and start looking at such things, by absorbing some losses? What is ur call on this?
3 people like this
3 responses
@GADHISUNU (2162)
• India
20 Aug 09
That companies do not invest in research or products that would replace their existing products is, if I am allowed to say, an Indian penchant. IOW taht is what would happen in India. That is why such an idea occurred to you, I feel. But like you, I do have a suspicion that the oil lobby will be working against any renewable energy based car/automobile. Like the Fuel Cell based Car for instance.Like tdemex said, I am sure a lot of money is being sunk into research by manufacturing organizations in the forefront, to bring more and more fuel efficient vehicles.I for one would love to have the Hydrogen Car become a reality as soon as possible.So also green energy generation initiatives should bear fruit and we must soon see the last of the polluting energy conversion techniques.
@tdemex (3540)
• United States
20 Aug 09
That's one of the problems with the batteries that has failed to be mentioned? The gas created when it's charging is dangerous, harmful to the environment, and no one is bring this up? tdemex
@GADHISUNU (2162)
• India
23 Aug 09
You are talking about Fuel Cells? Fuel Cella are supposed to be giving out either Water, or better still O2?
@tdemex (3540)
• United States
20 Aug 09
I'm from Detroit MI and worked in the research labs at a manufacturing company there, I have my name on a few patents! First you say "they spare little foe research and development" Where did you come up with this? Your wrong! they spend tons of money on this! Most have patents on some area of their process, this is only protected for a certain amount of time, in order to grow and protect their positions they must find better ways of doing things, the competition will if they don't! This is a viscous business, that's why they have corporate spies! They show concept vehicles to the public and they usually are very expensive! They are still in the development stage! To mass produce them at a good price is where the problem lies! Like the Volt, it will lose money on each vehicle sold but, eventually the technology will pay off as they put in in other new launch vehicles! Been there done that! tdemex
@vandana7 (100302)
• India
20 Aug 09
I stand corrected. I was assuming this based on a recent launch of a petrol model by one of the local companies. In these times, the company still installed a production capacity to manufacture petrol models, when the need of the hour is to move away from fossil fuels. I'd think it would be better to cater to the market that can afford green vehicles rather than try to capture lower segment of the market, just because there is a market. Ok Volt. Yeah I read about that. Buying a patented technology used in it must be very expensive. I dont really know how the profit projections work in such cases. But if it could become lifetime royalty like they have on Michael Jackson's songs, or books that are published, then may be cheaper deals could be worked out and even competitors could collectively usher such technologies in, each of course adding something unique of their own. But please, I am quite ignorant about these things. I accept I am wrong considering ur end of the world. I am sorry if I wrote out of turn. Thanks for correcting me. :-) For the sake of curiosity, may I ask the ratio of expenditure on research and development in any year to the profits of that year. It would give me a standard to compare the local industry.
1 person likes this
@tdemex (3540)
• United States
20 Aug 09
You don't have to apologize for anything! But songs are different than manufacturing. The patent is good for 20 yrs. and they can under some circumstances renew it! Usually by then others have leap frogged over them! The ratio of profit to R&D is different with each company, and they do give tax breaks for some! These are a key as to how much they spend here in the USA! My patents were owned by the company as I was hired to do this I had to sign a waver at the time I was hired, and I couldn't divulge this information to other companies for 20 years! LOL! My friends are working on these batteries now and it has a long way to go, on longevity, weight and other issues! They give off gases while they are charging! This is an unknown issue to the public! tdemex
@vandana7 (100302)
• India
20 Aug 09
Thanks for so much information. :-) On an idealistic level, I was wondering if it would be worthwhile for the entire automotive to pool their research and development resources and have a separate research and development center exclusively for their industry. That way, they could share any new invention, and also reduce repetitive costs investigating same thing. Part of it could be deployed in paying to the patent holder, and part could be passed on to the customer. Just a thought. And I really didnt know about the gases from batteries. Thanks for putting my mind at ease. Frankly, we had a heated discussion on Tata's Nano today. I am from India. Everybody was saying we buy outdated technologies, which are harmful to everybody. So it came up like that. Nice learning so much from u. U know something, even if we were given tax breaks like in ur country, our guys are so smart, they would buy a whole lot of consumables and write them off as used and thrown, while selling them for a cool profit. It would be a great way to siphon moneys under the head research and development expenses, so i guess we are better off spending less on it. :-)
1 person likes this
@yugasini (12893)
• Secunderabad, India
20 Aug 09
hi vandana, a good discussion about new cars using battery and hired throug mobiles,it is very useful in future,have a nice day