Do you willing write name your lover as a tattoo on parts your body ?
By advokatku
@advokatku (4033)
Indonesia
September 1, 2009 3:59am CST
I write name my girl first in my right arm to prove my love for her. But evidently our love cant be kept together. And I lament because has write name her as my tattoo ....
How about you, friend .... do you willing write name your lover as your tattoo, too ? I hope dont ...
15 responses
@pinklemonade (486)
•
1 Sep 09
I see nothing wrong with getting a tattoo for someone you love however I think if I ever had something done it wouldn't be as common or obvious at the persons name. I like the idea of getting something done that represents or reminds me of the person. I want to get a star to represent everyone who brings light and happiness into my life. If I were to ever get a tattoo for the love of my boyfriend I might choose something that is both a hobby of ours for example. I don't believe that by getting a tattoo it shows your love for someone. There are a million other ways to show someone you love them, a tattoo isn't necessary.
@advokatku (4033)
• Indonesia
2 Sep 09
Thanks for all your opinion, friends. Beginning I do that just show to her how much I love her and so people also see If I had a Lover's heart but turn out it was a stupid act
@MachaMongRuad (191)
• United States
1 Sep 09
That's a really good way to go about it. A name or even an initial is tempting fate just a little too much, but some sort of symbol or representation is perfect. If you break up with the person later and you're too embarassed or ashamed for whatever reason to explain that the tattoo is to represent that person, you can always come up with another reason for having the tattoo. This is a very good idea.
@advokatku (4033)
• Indonesia
3 Sep 09
heeey ... tattoo was not a crime, thea .... so, why not a lawyer has a tatto ? :-D ... and I know, I pregnant write his name as my tatto
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
1 Sep 09
I don't have any tattos at all but if I were to get one it sure wouldn't be a name. I have seen a lot of people get their partners name put on their body and then the relationship not work out. There they are stuck with a name from the past. No..I wouldn't put anyones name on me.
@sunny68 (1327)
• India
1 Sep 09
i personally am against any form of alterations to the body. no tattoo no piercing. your situation can certainly be one of the reasons. some things in life are irreversible and if we act stupid or in haste we might be left with no other option but to repent later on.
@ic3pr1nc3ss5 (37)
• United States
1 Sep 09
I think it's silly to do that. Tattos are nice, but not when it's your lovers name or something like that. What if you guys split up? then you have your ex-lovers name on your body part, and are reminded of them every day.
@weasel81 (2496)
• Australia
1 Sep 09
i can see the point, but no i wouldn't get a tat with my partners name nor my sons for that matter. it was one thing when i mentioned a tat, last yr to my work mate he said no names expect my sons cause. it would be my sons name, and that would be something that lasts. i got plans for my next tat and i'm not changing them.
@neelianoscet (9615)
• Philippines
1 Sep 09
No, I do not like to appear like an ex-convict .and a little tattoo is alright but not the name of a partner, if it happen you break your relationship it is hard to take out the tattoo in the body is already mark..very painful to remove..
@eLsMarie (4345)
• Philippines
2 Sep 09
no... i'm totally against it. no offense but i don't think that it's the best way of proving/showing love to a particular person... aside from it can no longer be erase from your skin, the result is that you will no longer be allowed to donate blood to anybody and what if it happens that your child will be sick or somethin'?
@abbypringles (1613)
• Philippines
2 Sep 09
Personally, No. I think that there are better and more genuine ways of showing someone how much you love and appreciate them in your life. gentle acts of kindness and other forms of expression of love are so much better than a tattoo.
@MachaMongRuad (191)
• United States
1 Sep 09
I've been interested for some time now in getting a tattoo, but it would never be of someone's name. I'm fairly sure that my current boyfriend and I are going to be together the rest of our lives, but I know very well that things can change and even if you think one thing now anything can happen in the future no matter how secure you and your partner both feel. I think pinklemonade's idea is perfect though. If I want to get a permanent mark to represent the person I love, why would it have to be a name? Why not some sort of symbol that reminds me of them? That wouldn't necessarily require an embarassing explanation, whereas the name probably would when you get into the next relationship.
@homeshoppers (6166)
• Philippines
1 Sep 09
no i will never put his name on any part of my body coz what will happned if we broke up.. it will be unfair to the next lol.... i dont bother to put any tattoo on any part of my body either as i find it very distracting.. though i know its an art and a lot love it but i guess not in my taste... i'm not against those who have as i also find it cute... i also tried henna tattoo and it only last for 1 month... so i guess henna is advisable than the permanent tattoo only if you want some temporarily like if you go to beach.