We Have a Democrat President and a Democrat Majority in Congress...GRRRR!!
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
September 4, 2009 8:07pm CST
I REALLY don't like the sound of that, do you? I mean, it's ridiculous, it's outrageous, it makes us seem STUPID...
BECAUSE IT IS STUPID!!!
We have a DemocratIC President and a DemocratIC majority in Congress. The members of the current Administration are Democrats as are the majority of the members of Congress but the correct use of the adjective is D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T-I-C!!
Sorry about the rant but whenever I hear or read someone using the word wrong I see red - probably because it's someone from a red state saying it or at least someone who WISHES their state were red.
I'd never been sure of the origins of this practice; actually, the first I recall hearing it on an ongoing basis is during the last Administration when I heard Bush say it first then other Republicans seemed to follow. I thought maybe they were trying to make him not seem dumb or something...lol...seriously, that's what I thought, I'm not being a smart a$$. However, apparently this practice has been around for longer.
http://jackbetts.blogspot.com/2009/01/poking-stick-at-democrat-party.html
I think the last paragraph of the above article says it all:
"Berger's right about the need for bipartisanship. But as long as he and his colleagues continue to deliberately misuse the name of the opposition party in such a high-schoolish way, it's hard to see how Democrats would feel much reason to change their ways. It probably only reinforces the Democrats' view that Republicans are only going to play political games, and so the Grand Old Party's legitimate gripes can simply be ignored."
Amen!!
Any comments?
Annie
3 people like this
10 responses
@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
6 Sep 09
It is funny how this discussion diverted from being about the correct use of words to a political discussion. I won't offer a political opinion but of course you are absolutely correct in your statement about the correct usage of Democrat and democratic.
I also have a pet peeve. I live in Canada and we have a "Public Service" Americans have a "Civil Service" and yet our Public Service is constantly referred to as the civil service even by people such as journalists who should know better. It really irks me. Argggh!
3 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
9 Sep 09
I don't blame you for being irked especially when it's someone who knows better. My thing in this thread is that I don't care if someone doesn't want to belong to it or if they like it or not, but they can at least describe it right - the Democratic Party...lol!
Annie
@Koriana (302)
• United States
5 Sep 09
with all the problems this nation is facing....people tend to bicker about the dumbest things......
maybe that's what the problem is....all the bickering is intended to keep our focus off the big problems, because the powers that be don't want to accept the task of finding real solutions for them....
bicker onward!!!
3 people like this
@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
7 Sep 09
How so, how does this discussion violate the Mylot rules? Petty or not, Anniepea is correct. However, to get away from the irritant, Americans could say "we have a Democrat as President and the majority in Congress consits of Democrats. Since America is a democracy it should be a foregone conclusion that all of the above are democratic.
2 people like this
@rogue13xmen13 (14403)
• United States
5 Sep 09
I have no problem with it because I am a Democrat. I love it. I hated George W. Bush and I hate Arnold Schwarzenegger. I live in California and Schwarzenegger has been a real pain in my side. I want a Democratic governor so badly. When anyone tells me that they are a Republican, I want to get away from them as soon as possible. I blame most Republicans and their ideals for all of the problems that are occuring in our country right now.
1 person likes this
@rogue13xmen13 (14403)
• United States
5 Sep 09
Hey, at least Obama is trying to make things better for people in the US. Bush only wanted wars with other countries. Obama wants everyone to have health care. I want health care, not war.
2 people like this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Sep 09
Too bad congress doesn't think that. All they care about is how much money the lobbyists are paying them and how can they vote to get more of it.
Face it.....they don't care about us. They pay us lip serivce and that's about it.
I am not a republican. I am not a democrat. YOu want to know why? Neither party knows what the word bipartisan means in any true sense of the word and neither knows what fiscal responsibilty is. It has all turned into a big game of who can trash who the most. A big sad jerry springer episode. Both sides have behaved childishly and immature. Both sides ahve done dirty dealings. Obama does not seem about to do anything about it. WHy? Because Pelosi and Reid are the ring leaders in it all and he is not able to stop them. Who put in the stimulus bill that corporations could use hte bail out money to pay CEOs multi million dollars bonuses. Snuck it at the last minuate.....Reid. And the CEO turned around and donated HUGE bucks to his re-election campagin bank accounts. Who has been the poster child of not being partisan? Pelosi. Her famous words of "we won teh election so we write the bill" have come back to haunt her. That stimulus bill was horrible. They rushed it and left too many loop holes and paid out more american dollars to wasteful BS than imaginable. SHe could care less about compromise or being fair. She wantes her way for the highway. Her behavior has been so much less than perfessional. I really exspected more out of the fist female speaker of the house.
I don't care what letter (r) or (d) is beside a candiates name. As long as they are honest, and will do the best the can for the american public. ANd not spend their days playing political games, back bitting, making back door deals and voting how the lobbyist wants and ignoring the american public.
Bush was bad. I will agree 100% with you. I don't know about Obama yet. Too early to tell. But I will tell the current congress we have is about as bad as it gets.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
5 Sep 09
They're all on the same team...against US.
1 person likes this
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
5 Sep 09
IMO it takes the 'bi' out of bipartison.
2 people like this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
5 Sep 09
Let me see, there was the German Democratic Republic, and democratic meant diddly squat. Look at all the Communist dictatorships with the name Democratic in their title.
At least in Canada we are more honest, we call our parties Liberal (anything goes, etc.) and Conservative (keep the old values). And I thought America was a republic= it had a president who made the major decisions.
A democracy does everything the people want, a dictatorship the people does everything the president wants, and a republic= well maybe it is in between. I would say that the latter would be the best way.
Names do not mean much. Besides democratics are for abortions, same gender marriages, etc. that is what the people want in spite of the consequences and what happens that eventually it becomes mob rule and then dictatorship. Not a happy picture.
2 people like this
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
5 Sep 09
jb78000 I think the consequences would be less money needed for abortions!!!! Which IMO means it is a plus ...no tax dollars for abortions. If anyone wants an abortion they should pay for it themselves.or in the case of rape victims the rapist should foot the bill.
2 people like this
@AngryKittyMSV (4317)
• United States
5 Sep 09
So does that mean that we previously had a Republicanic president?
1 person likes this
@AngryKittyMSV (4317)
• United States
5 Sep 09
And should independent politicians be referred to as independentic?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
5 Sep 09
Maybe if the leadership of the White House and Congress showed any interest in being at all DemocratIC we would recognize it in them.
When the party, or it's elected officials consider it a joke to actually read bills, sorry they have no right to claim anything Democratic.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
5 Sep 09
Kind of like that Jenkins woman who claimed she'd never heard of "The Great White Hope" being used in a racial context even though she'd supported a bill dealing with the fighter behind the original use of the phrase; her excuse then was that she hadn't read the bill. Both sides are guilty of that one!
Annie
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Sep 09
I have to agree with you on that one.
SOmeone needs to remind them it is actually in their job discription to read the bill in full BEFORE voting.
It is a basic job function for them.......yet they can not fullfill it.
It would think it would be a no brainer for them. BUt then again......
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Sep 09
Oh I agree annie. Both sides are guilty. But when do we say enough is enough and hold both sides accountable for the BASIC job functions that they are FAILING to proform. I am all for throwing them ALL out and starting over with a fresh bunch.
1 person likes this
@bdugas (3578)
• United States
5 Sep 09
I do believe if I am correct that Congress became a democratic congress during Bush's last term, and things went down hill from there, it is a game with both parties, they both want to give the people what they want when really what they mean is they want what they want and dont' give a cra*p what the people want. I give up too on any of them. I know that congress makes the laws and the president will ok it if he gets what he wants out of it, if he can't he will veto till he gets his part in whatever bill it is being passed. The president only give the suggestion and it is congress job to make the law and the rules, with a total democratic congress we don't have a fair chance in anything. People was told that it was not going to be a pretty thing when they gained complete control but they didn't want to listen. Now they will live with what they wanted.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
5 Sep 09
Well, you may not like them but at least you said their name right, which is what this discussion is about. In case anyone still doesn't realize it, my "GRRRR" in the subject wasn't because of who's in power but because of those who can't say it correctly...lol! I guess my little rant about one of my pet peeves kind of fizzled out.
Annie
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
6 Sep 09
As I get older, I like things simpler and more convenient. DemocratIC just rolls off the tongue easier when used as a adjective. Republican already has a convenient "AN" ending that can have a duel use as a noun OR an adjective. The libertarian party already has such an ending as well, their name will roll off just as nicely as the rest. Now, the constitution party is going to have some problems, as it does NOT already have an efficiant ending to it's party name. So we are left having to say, "constitutionalist", it just doesn't roll out as nice sounding. Then we get even more complicated when we start getting in to parties like the "Boston Tea Party" (not to be confused with the tea party movement), how in the HECK are we going to say it if they get a foot hold in congress? What do we say, "it's a bostonteapartian" controlled congress? .....politics is too confusing for sunday morning.
1 person likes this
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
5 Sep 09
I don't know what has happened to the educational system in the United States? It seems they don't even learn proper grammar in our school system. I was watching a tv show the other evening and this young girl kept saying "me and Jeff", don't they teach that you always put the other person first, it should have been "Jeff and I", but I guess nobody cares any more.
"Rant on" annie, here is one comment that I read about the article.
"Just another example of how bankrupt and devoid of ideas and decency the FlatEarth Republicans are."