Republicans and the Disabled

Tweet

I have noticed that there are a lot of Republican politicians on the news lately talking about how Obama's plans are to ration health care so that the disabled and elderly are denied procedures that they need. It makes me wonder- how many of the people who are repeating these accusations remember what MCCAIN would have done to the disabled? I am disabled, and I am concerned about health insurance, so I remember listening very closely when McCain discussed his health care plan, as well as listening to what local and state disability advocates were saying- and they were raising MANY alarm bells. In case I am accused of being biased, I am taking the following from a Pro-McCain article entitled "Why McCain has the best health care plan" from Fortune Magazine at http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/10/news/economy/tully_healthcare.fortune/ Direct quote starts here: "The problem with McCain's approach - and it is a huge problem - is that McCain ventures so far toward total laissez-faire liberty that he risks leaving the poor and sick behind. Here's why. Perhaps his most drastic proposal is allowing the same insurance products to be sold across state lines. That seems to make sense, and maybe it does: Look what interstate banking has done for pricing and choice in financial services. But in health care, the upheaval would be so brutal that it scares even the most ardent free-marketer. Many states have some form of what policy wonks call "community rating." Under pure community rating, insurers must charge all customers the same premium no matter whether they're 20 or 55, or whether they have cancer or are models of good health. McCain is targeting community rating for good reason. It forces the young and healthy to pay far more than their actual cost by making them subsidize the elderly and sick. Like the mandated benefits, it's pushed millions of Americans in their 20s to drop their health insurance. But under the McCain plan, states with no restrictions - Pennsylvania, for example - could sell policies for 25-year-olds that cost around $1,200 a year, one-third the price in New York. Young New Yorkers would drop their plans in favor of Pennsylvania providers, forcing New York insurers to jack up premiums for people in their 50s or early 60s, who need those rich, community-rated plans that cover as many procedures as possible - but who no longer benefit from the excessive premiums paid by the youngsters. It gets worse. Anyone with cancer, diabetes, or other pre-existing conditions will see their premiums multiply too. To his credit, McCain does have a plan for relatively young, low-income Americans who can't afford insurance. "We would increase the tax credit according to income so that poor families could buy insurance," says Douglas Holtz-Eakin, McCain's policy director. But McCain sorely lacks a plan for people in their 50s without corporate benefits, and Americans with pre-existing conditions, who would be brutally stripped of coverage if insurance crosses state lines. " Pre-existing conditions= American's with disibilities. Even this pro-McCain source admits that the disabled will be "brutally stripped of their coverage" DIRECT QUOTE So why are so many Republicans who supported MCCain so concerned about the disabled? The politicians are promoting business as usual for the rich. The average Joe republicans are following along like sheep. Why do the same politicians who would have thrown the disabled under the bus now seem so concerned about them now?