$10,000 fine...Taitz ordered to show cause within 14 days
By spalladino
@spalladino (17891)
United States
September 19, 2009 5:58pm CST
I guess you shouldn't continue to ridicule a judge when he threatens you with sanctions. Do you think this is excessive under the circumstances?
[i]A judge who dismissed a lawsuit over President Barack Obama's eligibility and was accused by the attorney of exhibiting "subservience" to that "same illegitimate chain of command" now is threatening the lawyer with a $10,000 fine.
U.S. District Judge Clay Land of the Middle District of Georgia had dismissed a complaint challenging Obama's eligibility to be commander-in-chief by Capt. Connie Rhodes, the medical doctor and Army officer who wanted a restraining order to prevent her overseas deployment on the basis Obama has not demonstrated himself to be a natural-born citizen under the U.S. Constitution.
Orly Taitz, the California attorney handling many of the lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, immediately filed a request for reconsideration of the dismissal, even though she was threatened by the judge with sanctions.
"Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto president is not even nominally the commander-in-chief of the Article III Judiciary," the request said.
Military litigation team attending earlier emergency hearing on Sept. 14
It was less than a day later when the irate judge responded.
"In her most recent tirade, plaintiff's counsel seeks reconsideration of the court's order dismissing this action. Instead of seriously addressing the substance of the court's order, counsel repeats her political diatribe against the president, complains that she did not have time to address dismissal of the action … accuses the undersigned of treason, and maintains that 'the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and … subservience…," the judge wrote.
"This filing contemptuously ignores the court's previous admonition that plaintiff's counsel discontinue her illegitimate use of the federal judiciary to further her political agenda," Land wrote.
"Counsel for plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the court should not impose a monetary penalty of $10,000.00 upon plaintiff's counsel for her misconduct. Counsel shall file her response to this show cause order within 14 days…," Land wrote. [/i]
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110300
3 people like this
7 responses
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
20 Sep 09
If the plaintiff's lawyer can prove that the judge has exhibited, "subservience" to that "same illegitimate chain of command", it might be a good idea to do so, but maybe not to this judge.
I'm not sure why Capt. Connie Rhodes is using Obama's eligibility to be commander-in-chief as a way to get out of being deployed overseas. I would think they could come up with something better. Whether or not Obama is a US citizen doesn't change the fact that Capt. Rhodes is still in the military and must obey orders.
2 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
This attorney has filed many lawsuits regarding Obama's citizenship and one of her tactics is to represent a member of the military who challanges the legitimacy of orders on the grounds that Obama has not "proven" that he is eligible to be Commander in Chief. Kind of a twist on reality there. This particular judge wrote a 14 page decision when he denied this case...covered many points...but, since he didn't rule as Taitz wanted, she filed even more paperwork even though the judge had warned her that she would be subjected to sanctions if she brought more cr@p (my word) before him. She has no proof of anything...just allegations and wild speculation.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
"Do you think a judge should be allowed to threaten a attorney with out cause,in this case Judge Land was out of line and these two cases are not over by any of streach of the imagnation."
Just because you don't agree with his ruling doesn't mean that he didn't have cause for threatening Taitz with sanctions if she continued to waste the court's time. If you make accusations against a judge, you'd better have some evidence to back it up.
"Don't you think for the sake of our country which looks like it is in very deep do-do the right thing to do is for Barack Obama to present all of his concealed document and put his citizenship question to rest once and for all?"
I do agree with you on this point, Rose. This should have been done a long time ago but, as some others have already mentioned a time or two, producing the documentation probably won't stop some folks and he's under no legal obligation to do so at this time. If Taitz makes it to Discovery, that will change things.
1 person likes this
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
20 Sep 09
Kennyrose, I've been arguing Obama's records at another discussion. I've tried to say that if he is legitimate, putting that information out will get that monkey off his back. I don't know if I'm getting through. There may be some people who will continue to doubt, but they will be dismissed after a while.
As far as the judge goes, if he's infringed on anyone's rights, he should be called on it. Maybe that's why this judge is so pissed. He knows he has done just that and has gotten caught. Of course, I don't know. I'm just guessing.
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
20 Sep 09
That's a very serious accusation she is making--does she have any proof to back it up? Probably not. I read the judge's decision and it seemed reasonable to me. If she has proof of political pressure, etc., she'd better present it or keep her mouth shut. Judges deserve the respect of attorneys and clients alike.
2 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
It looks to me like she's grandstanding. She can't cave...she's got clients to entice and money to raise. I hope she's got plenty of money because I would imagine that the next fine will be even larger.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Sep 09
Hurray for Judge Land!! Unless I heard it wrong I understand it was President Bush who appointed him, so "Good job, George!" If Orly isn't careful she'll have to do some moonlighting in one of her other professions to earn enough to pay her fines. Unfortunately, this isn't the best economy for dentists or real estate agents...lol!
Annie
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
I wouldn't trust her with my teeth!
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
20 Sep 09
I'm sort of torn on this. The money is a little excessive because people bring outlandish lawsuits every day and they are not fined but, how many lawsuits have to be filed and lost or dismissed before people will figure it out? LOL I have to agree with the one responder that said something about where is the proof that Obama was born in Kenya. I guess that innocent until proven guilty is just something that sounds good depending on the situation LOL
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
Exactly Zeph! This is my main objection to these court filings. Not one person who calls this judge unfair or who believes that Taitz is such a great patriot will agree that our legal system should be twisted in the way that she is trying to twist it if they were the ones being accused. I asked Rose above if she would like a specific family member of hers, who was recently involved in an accident, to be in the same situation...forced to prove his innocence against wild accusations instead of the other way around...but I'm sure she won't respond.
1 person likes this
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
20 Sep 09
Mmm, wondered what happened to that case. That's interesting. It's not good to tick off a judge, lol!
1 person likes this
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
20 Sep 09
Way to go Judge!! It is time that someone stands up to this BS and call them on the lack of any crediable evidence. I hope that this sends a message to all of those that hate our president, and are upset because their party can't win an election.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
It amazes me how twisted the logic of some folks can be. The rules don't apply to them because they just KNOW they're right...and then they try to wrap themselves in the Constitution while they try their best to molest our legal system.
2 people like this
@megaplaza (1441)
• Nigeria
20 Sep 09
They are just bugs trying to bring obama down. It's left for them to prove that Obama wasn't born in america, thats not Obama's problem. In 1999, a member of house of rep. Lied that he has b.sc at one american college. The nigerian house of rep dug that and found out that he was lying and he was removed as the speaker. So let them prove it.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Sep 09
The presumption of innocence is the foundation of our legal system...innocent until proven guilty. It seems that there are many people who are willing to ignore our laws...to twist them to suit themselves...while wrapping themselves in a fake cloak of patriotism. True patriots work within the system...they don't try to force their will on the courts and insult the judges who seek to follow the it's mandates.
1 person likes this