Are You Willing to Pay for Online News Content?
By getbrowser
@getbrowser (1708)
China
October 24, 2009 8:32am CST
You may have heard that Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp is considering creating a new business model in which consumers pay for online news content.
From where I stand, we have gotten so used to nearly everything on the Internet being available for free that it’s tough to shift to actually having to pay for what we’ve had freely available.
Are you willing to pay for online news content? Would you be prepared to pay for online newspapers such as news.com.au? Or would you only be prepared to donate even a small amount to help keep these online news sites alive and well?
4 people like this
15 responses
@celticeagle (166913)
• Boise, Idaho
26 Oct 09
No, I am not willing to pay for news. I never have. It is everywhere and if I can't get it one place I will go elsewhere. No, I am not willing to donate for these sites to stay afloat. Do they do good news. I know of none of them. It has been free and I am sure it will be free somewhere.
@madmillionaire (598)
•
25 Oct 09
I doubt this will ever happen and if it did I would avoid those sites. There will always be free sites around like the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) and others of its ilk. They are just trying to make even more money in my opinion.
@shantiquarian (146)
• United States
25 Oct 09
It was bad enough paying for fractured fairytale on paper, not likely in this lifetime to pay for it on the web when I can get the same crap for free on tv with dinner.
@voldrox (7191)
• India
25 Oct 09
Hi getbrowser
Well i don't think i can do that, i would not pay for online news, definitely not, there are so many nice free websites for that, and i don't know what extra we might get if we pay, i think e-mail notifications and probably some sms text etc etc, anyways i am not willing to pay just for some news!
have a nice day getbrowser!
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
24 Oct 09
No, I am absolutely not willing to pay for online news content. If I pay for news I want to be able to line the canary cage with it (figuratively speaking, as I do not believe in keeping birds in cages)--but there are many useful things to do with newsprint, and one may as well get some extended benefit out of what one buys. Perhaps Amazon's Kindle would hope to change all that, but you cannot wrap garbage in a Kindle.
@jpso138 (7851)
• Philippines
25 Oct 09
I will not avail of such. As you can see, we can always get information including news items online all for free. So there is no point in paying for them. Most of the things including information can be seen online for as long as you know how to search. The only investment that you do is your time and of course your effort.
@jules67 (2788)
• Philippines
24 Oct 09
NO, why should I spend something for news when I can read it online or on the newspaper or even on tv?
@much2say (55601)
• Los Angeles, California
24 Oct 09
Well, considering our budget, no, I would not like to add another bill to our household . . . so I would not be willing to pay for online news content. As everyone has already stated, I can get almost all the information I need online for free as it is. And then there is always television or radio news. I somehow don't see how consumers would be willing to pay for such a service unless there was something more that they had to offer.
@Rajkumarsuthar (6)
•
24 Oct 09
There are two big reasons for reading/listening/watching news. Business purpose and past-time. For Past Time Purpose i will never agree to pay for any type of news because there are many free ways to get this type of content viz. news channels and direct message from associated people. The first mean (Various News Channels)is free due to tough competition among them. Every news channel wants to spread its name so if they take money, other free news channel will occupy that place. The second mean of news i.e. direct listening from persons occurs because of natural human tendency of communication.
For Business purpose i prefer to pay for suitable and appropriate news regarding my own business. Example: A merchant or Share Holder must have knowledge about what is going in the contemporary market.
@fezman (260)
• Australia
25 Oct 09
i personally think that absoulutely no one should have to pay,. twice!
and thats exactly what people would be doing, isnt it?
first you pay for the use of the net, why should you be forced to pay for something thats free on tv? its free here now, so why enforce payment?
thats my opinion anyway...
@lordcaocao2025 (4098)
• Indonesia
24 Oct 09
Well, since i use internet, i actually never join any paying site. I only join a free site. So i think i will keep doing this since usually what the free site give us doesn't really inferior to those of the paying site. Especially if you talking about news, there are news every where in the internet that you can get for free, so why paid it?