Finally! Somebody asked the question!
By laglen
@laglen (19759)
United States
October 24, 2009 12:38pm CST
A CNSNews reporter asked Pelosi where it says in the Constitution that the government can require citizens to buy health insurance. He really didn't get an answer but at least the question was asked!
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55971
What do you think?
Later in the article, he asks If it is the Speaker’s belief that there is a provision in the Constitution that does give Congress this power, does she believe the Constitution in any way limits the goods and services Congress can force an individual to purchase?" CNSNews.com asked. "If so, what is that limit?
I wonder if people have really thought about this.....
1 person likes this
7 responses
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
25 Oct 09
There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to mandate something like this. It would be struck down in most courts if challenged. The federal government cannot force you to purchase ANYTHING for that matter. this would be unprecidented and completely unconstitutional.
I also want to put to rest the tired irelevent argument many people here and elsewhere here seem tobe using as a paralel example, the car insurance argument. The federal government cannot and DOES NOT mandate that you purchace autho insurance. In many states, this is done at the state level but ONLY if you register a car. No car, no insurance mandate. There is absolutely no relevence to the auto insurance argument, it's beyond rediculous to even try to draw a comparrison.
1 person likes this
@us2owls (1681)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Pelosi like so many others in Washington probably doesn't have a clue what the constitution says. All we as citizens can do is hope and pray that Pelosi and the likes of her are voted out of office ASAP. As for Mr. Obama being a constitutional lawyer - is he? Have you seen his law degree and the rest of his records ? Does he actually have a degree?
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
24 Oct 09
There are so many policies that violate the Constitution lately. Michele Bachman once asked how the Constitution gave congress the right to do something, I forget what, and never got an answer.
I don't think these people in DC have ever read the Constitution. If so, they would burn it.
1 person likes this
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Where does it say in the constitution that you have to have Car Insurance? But, most state in the country require it. Have YOU really thought about why you have to have Car insurance?
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
25 Oct 09
In my state you are not fined, you lose your license and can be put in jail. What state do you live in?
@Ima_C_Suvaya (431)
• United States
25 Oct 09
You miss my point. I don't have to have a car. Think about all those New Yorkers and other big city downtown dwellers who don't have cars. Do you think they should be required to have auto insurance (maybe to make up for those that can't afford it)? I only have to have car insurance if I have a car or drive. I can't think of any state that forces you to have auto insurance even though you don't own a car or drive. However, it probably isn't far down the line.
@Ima_C_Suvaya (431)
• United States
25 Oct 09
I don't have to have car insurance. And I will not be fined for not having it.
@Ima_C_Suvaya (431)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Congress could force us to buy a GM vehicle.
1 person likes this
@MuncheeLee (132)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Awesome! I think it's great that someone interviewing actually noticed that this is against the Constitution!
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Is it then also against the constitution for me to be forced to have Car Insurance? Because that would be AWESOME!!!!
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
25 Oct 09
X, there is nothing in my STATE consitution about this either. But, should I just carry a copy of that with so the next time I get pulled over I can show the officer? Would you think this would work well?
@valentinesdiner (1214)
• United States
25 Oct 09
Candidate Senator Obama was really pressed on the issue of making insurance manditory... would his bill cover all Americans.
In the primaries he was attacked by "cover everybody" candidates like Clinton and Kucinich that he was not a true Democrat unless he called for all to be covered. He stood fast and said he would provide options but nothing manditory. That took some guts.
I have not heard Obama change from the 'mopre options' pitch he had made earlier. Maybe Pelosi is facing the others in the caucus calling for blanket coverage, but it does not appear in the Prez's plan.