Feedom of speech is very improtant. Media is a very powerful .I am right?

99% of media is controled. By who ? By the owners of media channels, who are owners or friends with owners of other big money institutions. Now think like this: If you calculate the price of a newspaper, you'll be stoned to find is far more expensive than the price you pay for it .. sometimes even 10-50 times more expensive to make ONE than the price is printed for sale. How they cover the expenses and get profit ? COMMERCIALS. TV (wave, cable, whatever) have very big costs - people, equipments, energy, utilities (including expenses for transportations whervere is the event ..). How they cover, while they broadcast for free ? COMMERCIALS. Who is behind commercials ? Producers of whatever goods or services. Are thos product good ? Are those services best ? Doesn't matter, you keep seeing them and you start beliving are good. So you will CONSUME. Now .. if you'll be one who have something to sale and with the finnancial power of a "big guy", would you do anythink to make more sales ? Sure. So they do too ... Media is a tool to manipulate. Period.

I do not think so. everyone has his points,he may express what he want, his means may effect others. I think we can have our thinking, but we can not effect other the with our point.

The media should be truthful? Wishful thinking. Privately-owned media organisations exist to make a profit. (Or did you think Rupert Murdoch did it out of the goodness of his stone-cold heart?) If it is profitable to tell lies, taking libel damages into account, newspaper editors will tell lies. My greatest hope is that independent media (internet users, bloggers, twitterers, etc.) defines the 21st century. Then, I think there is an element of freedom and democracy.