The Military and Single Mothers

United States
November 18, 2009 1:12pm CST
There is a big story on the news today about a mother who refused to deploy to Afganhastan because she claims there is no one to watch her infant son. I heard long ago, that wouldn't send the only son of a family into service for they keep the family's name, etc. I also have a mixed emotion on this situation. One, I know she knew what she signed up for and new this would happen and she would one day be sent overseas. though on the other hand, I wouldn't want to leave my baby either and want to be with him, watching him do all his "firsts" Should the military do something with single mothers? I have known many friends who are married and they "both" get sent overseas and neither one of them see their children. Their family and friends watch and raise the children while they are away. What is your view on this situation?
7 people like this
11 responses
@owlwings (43910)
• Cambridge, England
18 Nov 09
First of all, the military should only employ people who are fit and ready to serve. Single mothers do not, in my opinion, qualify. There are sufficient and readily available methods of preventing pregnancy, if someone is dedicated enough to want to serve their country in this way. Secondly, why do we still have troops in Afghanistan? We (both the UK and the US) are not going to win that 'war'. That, however, is quite another issue!
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Nov 09
I know many single parents who are in the military and still have someone else watch their children. It is not easy, but would you want to stop your life? Yes, there are alternatives to preventing pregnancy but if I would like to have a child with one, I feel we were going to be together I would like to be a mother also. I am sure this lady knew of friends or family to help care for her child if she was deployed. Yes we are still there :(( I thought we were to pull out but don't look that way.
@owlwings (43910)
• Cambridge, England
19 Nov 09
A single parent is, normally, only 'single' in the sense that she has elected (or been forced by circumstances) to bring up the child on her own. Many single parents have a network of friends and family who support them and help to care for the child - indeed, as a grandparent, I have done this for both a single daughter and a married son! The news story is really hardly news-worthy. Behind it is a person who either did not think things through properly before she had a child (accidents happen, I know, but there are plenty of alternatives for truly responsible people) or has had a change of heart. The military authorities cannot and should not be held responsible for either of these eventualities.
1 person likes this
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
18 Nov 09
In my opinion Alexis Hutchinson should have been discharged as soon as her son was born she being a single mother. Maybe she could have had the father keep the baby even though she was no longer in a relationship with him. I don't think that both parents should be allowed to be in a military because they both could be deployed. I don't think that single mothers should be allowed in the service either.
• United States
19 Nov 09
They never said anything about the father and I am sure there is more we will be hearing on this issue. I also don't think both parents should serve for many reasons.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
19 Nov 09
There is a difference between a woman who joins the military, who is married and whose husband is in the military and one of them gets killed. Then the surviving spouse, if there is no relative to look after the baby or if there is no one who was promised the baby, gets an compassionate discharge. And if there is a relative or friend who will look after the children, then both father and mother get sent overseas. But the case of a not married mother is different and especially one who had an affair while in the military and I suppose that if she already had a child and joined, the recruitment officer would ask who would look after the baby so I am assuming she got pregnant while in the military. One cannot depend on her boyfriend whom the army assumes did not love her enough to make her his wife. Nor can they depend on the boy's parents whom they assume tried to get them either to get married or get them to not see each other nor the parents of the girl who also wished that the boyfriend would go to the justice of the peace and get a license if he could not afford a big wedding. But I think the underlying thought is that you think "I am a single mother and because I will not leave my baby, I am more of a real mother then a married mother who will go off with her husband to the war and leave the baby with relatives." The married parents who have to leave their babies with relatives love them no less then the single mother who will risk jail rather then leave her baby in the hands of foster parents. Well she could have made provision that in case there were no relatives, what kind of foster parent would take care of the baby, a best friend, a neighbor, etc.
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
20 Nov 09
I agree with you that they would have asked her and told her the problems. And there would have been more then just her family, so she should have made alternative arrangements. It was just that she was not thinking far enough ahead and if she did not want to be separated from her baby, why did she request assignments that would send her overseas? Being a clerk or working at the motor depot may not seem as glamorous as driving a jeep in Afghanistan and meeting so many exotic people, but at least she would not be in jail.
• United States
19 Nov 09
I am sure while she was pregnant, they would also ask who would raise or watch the child while deployed. I haven't heard anything about the father, but I am sure he could watch the baby, if he isn't in military, or his family. I am sure she would have friends and her family to watch while she was deployed also. I am not in military, but know many who are single, parents, married or divorced and still go to active duty. They all knew the ranks, rules, and duties that are asked and aquired of them. I am sure even before she was pregnant knew what she was getting into. If she don't want to leave her child to go to war, but what if the military sends her to jail? She would still be leaving her child; then foster parents would be watching her child and not family.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
19 Nov 09
There are ways for her to get out of the military if she so wants but she has to follow the proper channels. I know a girl personally who got pregnant while in the service. I am not sure of the procedure but she did ask to get out and they did allow her a discharge.
• United States
19 Nov 09
I think she didn't go through the channels or even tried to get a discharge for how far this situation is going. It would have been much better and less hassle if she had.
@srganesh (6340)
• India
19 Nov 09
Hai charblaize!As you have stated she should have anticipated this depart away overseas.She have to abide by the rules of the military and her request will not be considered by the stiff uniforms.Anyhow,we can't rule out her wish to be near his kid.Only thing left for us is to pray for her.May god show her a good path.Cheers!
• United States
19 Nov 09
Yes, hopefully this will work out by faith in the Lord.
@junmae (1586)
• Philippines
19 Nov 09
Dont blame her, i know she knew it but it just accidentally happens that she got pregnant. No one wants to be pregnant in the wrong time.
• United States
19 Nov 09
I am not blaming her, I know these happen; it did to me. What I am more concerned about is Should the military make her go to active duty? She should have known she would be deployed and find a caregiver for her child? Let her child be with the father even though they were not together?
@jennybianca (12912)
• Australia
19 Nov 09
There is probably more to this than what we hear via the media. I wouldnt normally agree with a single Mother being sent overseas with the Military.Im not sure why she got invloved in the military in the first place. It is possible I guess, that this woman joined the Military before she had a child, thenm later married, had a child, then divorced. She may have joined the Military with the best of intentions, but circumstances change. I guess the Military has protocols for changing circumstances.
• United States
19 Nov 09
That could also be true, not knowing everything. We all know how the media is. Many others have joined, later married, had children, divorce, etc.. I know there are many other single mothers who feel like her, but still go to their Active Duty and get deployed. This is what I don't see how she feels she is different from everyone else.
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
22 Nov 09
I don't know, this is a hairy situation. Yes, she knew what she was doing when she joined and had no business getting pregnant. But what about the child? If this is the one I'm thinking of, she is already caring for a niece or nephew, too, and her mom is raising some grandchildren and is overwhelmed. I really think they should not deploy her but put her on a desk locally. Then they should make it a rule--totally un-PC or course--that a woman has to have a Norplant device while she's in the service during her childbearing years. That's the only solution I can think of.
• United States
19 Nov 09
I don't know all the facts of this case but if she can not serve because she has no one to care for her child, she should be allowed to leave the Army. If she just wants to be exempted from deployment and still retain all the other benefits she has with the Army, then that's not right. You take it all or you take none. I'm the mother of two American soldiers and I certainly don't want to see them deployed anywhere but that's part of the agreement when you join the Army. You take the good with the bad. You can't change the rules to suit your lifestyle.
@kawalnarang (1095)
• Trinidad And Tobago
19 Nov 09
In my thinking the parent should have the choice,,Duty towards a child in Most important,,
• United States
22 Nov 09
I'm for the Mother and I'm glad I've just seen this......I almost enlisted the other week and I'm a single mother with a 4 year old little boy. I don't think the recruiters are telling Mothers what the possibilities/consequences are and I know for fact they didn't tell me I could be deployed, in fact, I was told right the opposite--My friends had to tell me and once I informed the recruiting sergeant that I needed to research "deployment and single mothers" he has stopped calling?? This recruiter called me for 2 months and pushed the idea of the jobs that I would have to pick from and the nice $10K sign on bonus, along with my degrees, I would start at $3,000 a month pay-- "Reserves" was pushed and implied that one would be just that and not deployed. Also, a lot of recruiters aren't well informed...I actually knew more about waivers and the process than he did? My branch was going to be Army...not sure what branch this Mother had chosen, also I think how well you score on the ASVAB depends where you are in the pile, because that score depicts what jobs you have to pick from--if you don't score well then your choices are not as many, so anyone is probably more destined for active duty. Thank you for this posting!! Amy from Durham, NC