Weight-based airfare

@2timothy (794)
Philippines
December 4, 2009 1:31am CST
With airlines always finding innovative ways to cut fares and costs and given the direct proportion of cargo weight and fuel cost, weight-based airfare might soon be offered. "It's the way cargo flies; if something is twice the weight, you pay twice as much. (regardless of the space it occupies or seat for that matter)" says Robert Mann, an industry analyst and consultant. Here is a proposal, half price for those under 50 kilos (children and underweight), double price for those over 150 kilos.
2 people like this
5 responses
@skysuccess (8858)
• Singapore
8 Dec 09
2timothy, In the first place, I just do not think that passenger airfares can ever be weight-based as we are all human where everyone of us have our personal needs unlike the cargoes in the hold below. We have needs where it needs tending. Inflight service, food, refreshments and personal effects are mandatory for air passengers. Weight-based structure is also deemed unfair and discriminating on the whole if implemented. This is where the heavier will always have to pay more for that cabin seat and inflight service. Last but not least, there is the issue whereby there will be a massive variable for passenger tax, fuel surcharges and airport taxes to be in uniform with this airfare structure. On the whole this is impractical and would never work as it will just create a massive problem on conformity on the overall structure. Don't forget that passenger movement is much more versatile and with so much variables the system will be easily exploited. Which at the end of the day will be a bane than a blessing for the airlines.
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
10 Dec 09
The fare can be the same but since added weight means more fuel, it would be reasonable for weight-based tickets to charge extra fuel-surcharge rather than on the basic fare. With the recent popularity of budget airlines, inflight service, food, refreshments and personal effects become optional, offered inflight with extra (higher price) cost. Some airlines even have hot meals removed from their menu and ovens removed to lighten their aircraft and thus save on fuel.
1 person likes this
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
12 Dec 09
Budget airlines are mostly geered for domestic and short distance regional flights, long distance flights without much comfort is unbearable. Sometimes the cabin aircondition is very cold and dry and passengers cannot but request for hot drinks and blanket to warm up with a relatively higher price. Whether it is this way or the other, what we really want to see is that airlines find the best way to offer economical fares with profit. If all airlines would only agree to work together to improve logistics, there would not be so many empty seats (and waste of overhead) during off peak seasons and no available seats and high price during high peak seasons.
1 person likes this
• Singapore
10 Dec 09
I think we should not forget that international airfare prices have been set through bilateral governmental agreements rather through market mechanisms. As such, International Air Transportation Association (IATA) is founded as a price setting body for international airfares. Their air tariffs are being structured for airlines to conform to a uniformity for both the national airline of the country and other foreign airlines that might ply the same routes of the national carrier. This uniformity here also means that different airlines can then pool and share their routes for a wider destination coverage and higher frequency without straining their own limited resources. Just basing on the intricacies here, will tell you what will happen when one airline or certain group of airlines wants to restructure their airfares to weight based. Everything has to be renegotiate and price restructure, just this very lone exercise is enough to drive the fares sky high and would not have be any help to marketing the airlines. I feel that airlines should find other ways to increase their earnings like leasing out retail outlets on the flight. The super jet nowadays can house a deck of dedicated for shopping and leisure. Selling more inflight duty free goods, necessities or even freshly cooked special dishes on top of their inflight meal menus. I cannot say if taking away basic necessities as practiced by low cost carriers can solve margin issues but I would not advocate if the flight duration is 3 hours and above. Especially, when the flight is close to meal times, it is just not being people or service oriented here. The galley is not just a mere kitchen but that it is strategic structure to provide storage of inflight necessities like refreshments and food. It is also how food and services can be rendered in a prompt and timely manner. Besides, how heavy is an oven compared to it providing vital services in a timely and accessible manner. So, I don't think this form of airfare will be implemented at this stage or any closer time. Take care.
1 person likes this
@ladym33 (10979)
• United States
4 Dec 09
I think that is remarkably rude for the airlines to do that. If the person is occupying the same seat as a thinner person why should they pay more? I think that is very prejudice against people who are not thin. Now I can see if they were taking more than one seat, but if they are scrunching up in those little airline seats then they should not have to pay any more than anyone else. That is just mean and cruel in my mind.
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
5 Dec 09
Even not counting on the space occupied which cause inconvenience to neighboring passengers, it would still be fair to pay according to weight since weight is directly proportional to the fuel costs incurred.
1 person likes this
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
5 Dec 09
Economy class is designed with space economy in mind, oversized people may opt to take the business class with wider seats and leg room. But if weight economy would be taken into account, business class would become a requirement.
1 person likes this
• China
5 Dec 09
hey, i think it is fine. so we can cost less price and it is good for the globle enviroment. o. are you in China?
1 person likes this
@madteaparty (2748)
• Japan
4 Dec 09
If they atually decided to cut the prices in half for the plane tickets of us, people who weight under 50 kilos, I'd be extremely delighted. I'm eagerly looking forward to it
1 person likes this
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
5 Dec 09
Maybe 25% discount for underweight would still be highly appreciated and overweight pay extra 25% is still acceptable.
1 person likes this
@rajuroy5 (148)
• India
4 Dec 09
this would really be a welcome move if at happens... i am not a underweight but still will be good for the small ones in my family who are below 50Kgs... Also the cargo that each person can take... is it also going to be reduced or increased... because i remember paying an extra 1500 bucks for 15 Kgs of extra luggage when i was shifting my home... As per i know, girls would be the happiest lot if this news come out...because they are the ones who are usually underweight or what they say as dieting figure...