Short questions lead to short answers! Why?
By liquorice
@liquorice (3887)
December 18, 2009 5:02pm CST
I just found an old discussion where the question was "where are you now?" No disrespect to the person who started the discussion - it could have potentially led to some interesting answers! - but it led me to make this fascinating myLot observation .
When a person starts a discussion that is very short - like when they ask a short question and just leave it there - most of the answers tend to be very short as well. They often don't even reach the end of the first line! (I'm basing this on some other discussions I've seen, not just the one that I mentioned).
On the other hand, longer discussions where the person asking the question elaborates on what they've asked, tend to lead to much longer and thoughtful answers (not all the time, but often).
Now, I've been pondering why this might be . (I have some time on my hands, lol!) Maybe it's because the people who tend to give longer answers can't be bothered with people who ask short questions. They like to discuss, and a short question (especially those that require 'yes' or 'no' answers) are unlikely to lead to much of a discussion, and the answers probably won't be too interesting.
And maybe the people who respond to the short questions just don't want to put effort into their answers. Perhaps they just can't be bothered to read longer questions. (Am I being unfair?) Maybe they're trying to answer as many questions as they can in the least time possible. (Ok, so they won't earn much this way, but that's their choice).
And this behaviour then leads to a sort of matching of the minds. People who like asking short questions are exposed to people who like answering short questions. Perhaps they then become friends, are exposed to oneanothers' discussions through notifications, and the short-question/answer discussions just continue to grow and grow. Maybe eventually myLotters will evolve into two distinct groups; the short posters and the long posters. [Note to self: maybe I'd better stop my theorising now, I don't want to put off anyone who's been good enough to stick with me this far...]
Of course it is perfectly possible to write a short answer to a long question. Or a long answer to a short question; (I've done that in my time - as you can probably guess, lol!) Just doesn't seem to happen a lot. So if you like putting detail in your answers, do you avoid short questions, and why? And if you're a short poster, do you stick to the short questions? Why do you do that? (And do you realise that you won't earn much that way??)
Thanks for staying with me! This isn't a rant, just something I've been wondering about.
:0)
1 person likes this
13 responses
@much2say (55665)
• Los Angeles, California
21 Dec 09
This is interesting - and you're right about your observation! Perhaps it is a psychological thing. Short questions - it could appear as if they're just one of those myLotters who just ask away questions but never reply - they're not really looking to discuss. So if I feel like responding, I won't write a whole long thing assuming it may not be read, but at least I answered. Long questions - someone definitely took the time to elaborate, so they must truly want to discuss. If I respond, it means I read the discussion and felt it deserved the response it needed - assuming that person has the same attention span as I do. I tend to write in length anyway, so in a way it doesn't matter if the question is short or long . . . I have "much to say" and will write my 2 cents about it.
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Jan 10
Well that's a good point. It's a case of if the asker didn't put much effort into asking the question then we won't put effort into answering it. And we think that it won't be read anyway. (Especially, I suppose, if we can see they have a history of not replying back). Good observation!
You are very well-named then. I'm glad that you have much to say!
@much2say (55665)
• Los Angeles, California
9 Feb 10
Thanks for the BR, liquorice! And also for the compliment on my screen name - sometimes I just never shut up - ha ha!
Since your discussion, I've been having it my mind about the way I answer too. Indeed if the discussion topic is too short, I tend to not elaborate on my answer too . . . and it seems to go with most other answerers as well. I wonder how many of these types I have commented on and what I wrote is just floating in cyberspace never to be read!
@sulsisels (1685)
• United States
19 Dec 09
Hi liquorice..I already posted this, but something happened and my response vanished into thin air..story of my life!! Anyway, just in case it was a glich and shows up, sorry for the double post. I agree with you 100%. I was thrilled when I found this site as there arn't too many sites where you can have discussions with others and have some good comversation. My problem is that I dont find too much that interests me and get annoyed at the too short question and shorter answer as if on a game show. I don'tot think thats what mylot had in mind when creating the site and I think that if you like the one liners, than maybe Twitter is the place to be. Discussions like "What time did you go to bed last night?" and "Do you like pizza" aggravate me. Do you really care what time they went to bed or whether or not they like pizza? I dont and would never respond. Notice, however how many responses those questions get...lots, while I once posted a discussion on a very important issue, Global warming and the effect its having on the polar bear whos existance is going to end in extinction if something is not done. (Read it under my profile and tell me why I got only one response) I came to the conclusion that, and of offense is intended towards anyone here, this just isnt the place for that type of topic..obviously, with one response. Then a mylotter told me that people dont respond to "newbies" or people with under 100 posts which I had at the time. That to me is very juvenile but I think its true. The folks who post the quick easy discussion I believe are more into quantity rather than quality and probably think they will earn more money that way while I think the exact opposite is true. I think the staff of Mylot is looking for good quality discussions and responses that require a little bit of thought and are interesting enough to spark the attention of another person. Isn't that what a discussion is? I don't come here for the money..While it is nice that they pay you, lets face it, you are not going to get rich here and I look at it as a bonus and leave it in my paypal account to pay shipping and handling on something etc. Its never enough to withdraw, at least not for me. Dont get me wrong, I love the site and come here often to browse the topics. I just wish that I would find more things that I think are worth contributing too. I usually end up in cooking as I am a recent grad of cullinary school and can always find someone to help out there and have received help myself as in my last post about being a cookie failure. Take a look at it, I got lots of responses, probably the most ever for me. If you look at my 0 responses, my list goes on and on. Its embaressing!! In any case, thanks for the great discussion today and I hope to see you again. If its ok, I'm going to add you as friend so that I'll be notified when you post. Have a very merry Christmas and a happy, healthy new year..J
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Jan 10
No problem, lol! Hope you got an exorcist in to look at your computer!
I'm glad that you've got the cooking section to fall back on if things get too slow here. I have a fair few zero discussions myself, or ones with one answer, when a nice friend has taken pity on me, lol! I'm glad that you liked the discussion. I hope you had a merry christmas and a happy new year!
@sulsisels (1685)
• United States
19 Dec 09
See, I told you..It showed up after all..Sorry,,my computer is doing some very weird things lately..I think its possessed!! J
1 person likes this
@sulsisels (1685)
• United States
19 Dec 09
Hi liquorice..Great discussion..Its not often that I find something that really catches my attention as this did, so thanks for that. I often get fustrated here because I am under the impression that it is a place to have "discussions" not quick questions and answers as if one were on a game show. You can usually tell immediately the folks that are only interested in quantity, not quality. I guess they think they will earn more money that way when in actuality I think the opposite is true. I think mylot is looking for good, meaningful discussions and responses that require a little bit of thought and that have something to offer and possibly even keep the discussion going by interesting others in participating. I do not come here for the money..Lets face it, you are never going to get rich here. While its nice that they pay you, its not my priority, at all. I enjoy good intelligent conversation while meeting new and interesting people. There are not too many sites on the internet that offer what mylot does but it needs to be used as intended. If you like one line conversation than possibly Twitter is the place to go. I just cant get enthused about discussions that start with "What time did you go to bed last night?" or "Do you like pizza and ice cream?" Those are one line questions and one line responses. Do you really care what time someone went to bed, or whether or not they like pizza and ice cream? I dont. I once started a discussion about an extremely important issue, Global warming and the possible extinction of the polar bear. (you can read it under my profile I think) In any case, I got one response. Its an important issue and deserves discussion but I guess this just isnt the place, no offense intended to anybody, to discuss it. As a test, I posted a discussion about a movie starring Beyonce and got about 10 responses. What does that tell you? Don't get me wrong, I have had many good discussions here and continue to come here everyday and browse the topics I just wish there was more that interested me. I am a chef, recent grad, and spend most of my time in cooking. If I cant find anything else, I can always participate there as cooking is my forte. I have helped many with cooking questions etc and enjoy doing so. So, thats my take on the long/short question issue. Hope to see you post more often as you are exactly the type of person I'm looking to share with. If its ok with you I am going to request you as a friend so that I will be notified when you share. Thanks for the great topic..and Merry Christmas to you and yours...J
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Jan 10
Good answer! Yes, for the people who are here for myLot's intended purpose, longer discussions are just more appealing and more interesting. I like how questions about ice cream are fast becoming a standard example of short questions here on myLot. I've noticed this example used in several discussions now. (It's true though, there do seem to be a lot of questions that go something like "what's your favourite ice cream?"...) Maybe short questions can be known as "ice cream discussions" from now on, lol!
I hope you manage to find some good discussions to interest you. And thanks for participating in this one!
@DJDexta (5)
• United States
19 Dec 09
Most short questions are always going to be a short answer. Reason being that I found is most people are answering as fast as they receive the question. Plus were all getting lazier so questions are getting shorter as well as answers. However short questions I have found can sometimes lead into huge discussions.
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Jan 10
Yes, makes sense. Maybe there are people who only answer short discussions because they don't want to give long answers.
@gitfiddleplayer (10362)
• United States
19 Dec 09
I guess it actually depends on how much somebody has to say on the subject. Sometimes a quick answer is all they really have, sometimes it may strike a nerve and they will expand even more than somebody else does. I sometimes read what people write because it says something about them.
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Dec 09
Yes, you're right. That's a sensible answer. I suppose that longer questions improve the chances of inspiring people to say more on the subject. But it depends on how interested one is in the subject matter in the first place. Thanks for your answer.
@abhi_bangal (5534)
• Ahmednagar, India
19 Dec 09
I whole heartedly agree with you. I have also observed the same thig and gone through it too. I also tend to write short answers to shorter disuccsions and without noticing it, give bigger answers to longer disucssions. I doubt how does this automatically happen without the brain knowing to much of it, or like a subliminal effect. Whatever be the reason, there is 100% truth in what you are saying.
My Second observation is that, if the discussions are shorter I tend not to give it much importance. I wonder how many of us might be doing the same. The bigger the discussions, the bigger the possiblity of answering. Why I think so is because others get more ideas to answer the question according to the started discussion. Because there are sub questions in the original disucssion.
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Jan 10
Yes, what you're saying makes sense. I think that most of the time I also tend to give less importance to shorter discussions. Unless it's a subject that I'm very interested in. And yes, bigger discussions give people lots of ideas for answers and there's more chance that they'll be interested in at least a part of it. Thanks for your reply!
@anotherxidentity (1434)
• United States
19 Dec 09
Yes but your longer than needed elaboration had me stopping not even halfway through and it might be the reason you don't get as many responses as you want.
The thing is if a topic can have a short response then of course there are going to be a ton of short responses.
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
22 Dec 09
Thanks anotherxidentity. I'm not surprised that some people will have stopped part way through the discussion post. Another of my theories is that over-long discussions don't get many answers, lol! Yes, I do like theorising, and I realise that they're sometimes rather obvious theories. When I started this discussion I was in an over-elaborating kind of mood.
I find it interesting that if a topic can have short answers then there will be lots of them. Both from an earnings and an interest point of view. Thanks for your answer.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
18 Dec 09
Hello liquorice.
Is this the reason why you wrote a pretty long discussion for a seemingly short topic?
My views are: if the discussion is long, and elaborated, then there is the tendency of parts of the discussion making a connection to other myLotters. We may have no opinion on the subject matter, but the examples brought out brings to mind personal experiences that help others to respond.
1 person likes this
@liquorice (3887)
•
24 Dec 09
Hello bounce, kind of. I was also in a bit of an over-elaborating type mood.
Yes, I get what you mean, the longer the discussion the more chance that there will be something in there to appeal to different myLotters. (Although I know that it shouldn't be toooooo long, lol!)
Thanks for your reply.
@madteaparty (2748)
• Japan
19 Dec 09
Communication is an act of giving and receiving. We throw a ball and the other person trows it back, and if we catch it we close the circle. If someone makes a closed question -another way to call "yes or no" questions- that person can't expect to receive something else than a yes or a no. As communications involves this process, if someone asks something in a very short and brief way, the other person most of the times might can't help but answering in the same way.
Just an observation from my part
1 person likes this
@highbridgemom (83)
• United States
18 Dec 09
My guess would be that they are posting a lot of little questions hoping to improve their earnings on here.
Rather than a one word answer, I would usually just skip the question and not post at all. I have also written huge posts in response to a short question and vice versa.
@liquorice (3887)
•
24 Dec 09
Yes, you're probably right. But posting lots of little questions possibly won't do too much to improve their earnings. I'm like you in that really short questions don't appeal to me. If there's only scope for a yes or no answer, or a one word answer then I tend to look for a more interesting question. But yes, I have also been known to write long answers to short questions when I have something to say!