Survivor: Samoa - UPSET!
By Foxxee
@Foxxee (3651)
United States
December 20, 2009 10:39pm CST
Yes I am upset & I have never been upset over a TV show before.
HaHa!
I'm upset Russell didn't win.
Yes I believe Russell played better then anyone has ever played on Survivor.
Russell should be named The Best All Time Survivor Player! He was amazing & he deserved to win.
As for Nat... well all I can do is laugh. I think that was a mistake? She wasn't a good player at all. HaHa!
OMG!
Too funny...
Anyway, the polls seem to agree & most of America seems to think Russell was the best all time player & should of won as well... not Nat.
Anyway, it sure has been a good season of Survivor up until the end anyway...
Love ya Russell! You played amazing!
1 person likes this
3 responses
@allen0187 (58582)
• Philippines
22 Dec 09
agree with you here foxxee!
i think russell played the game how it should be played. imagine the scenario, foa foa was losing challenges left and right. they went into the merger outnumbered, the foa foa four against the 8 man strong of galu. then russell's game plan started unfolding. one by one russell shot down the galu members until there was only one galu member left and foa foa had the numbers. russell even won the last immunity challenge (the first time he won an immunity challenge) and in the process ousted brett.
now, i knew that the biggest stumbling block against russell winning the million dollars is the jury vote. russell had a one in all of the jury members being voted out and natalie, although she simply rode the coattails of russell, had no blood in her hands so to speak. it was simply the jury having their way in th voting for the winner of this season's show.
anyway, i'm already looking forward to the next season. it will be a heroes vs villains thing and you guess it right, our favorite player, the ultimate survivor (at least in our book), russell is in the villains team.
cheers!!!
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
23 Dec 09
I agree allen...
Russell pissed off the jury? Well... hmmm... its a game & your not suppose to vote with your emotions, your suppose to vote by who played the game better & you can't tell me Nat played the game better then Russell, because she really didn't do nothing & she only made it that far because of Russell. She won also because the jury voted for who was the nice person, not who played better. Emotions got in the way & even the host Jeff has said this & almost all of America!
Look at Shambo & Jon, they voted for Russell & Russell talked crap about both of them & said some hurtfull things, but they didn't let the emotions get in the way & they did what was asked of them, vote for the stronger, better player... that they did.... Russell.
@sunshine4 (8703)
• United States
21 Dec 09
I think that the one guy at the end who stood up and said that who is to say Russell played a better game than Nat actually helped Nat win. He did have a point. Nats strategy was to align with someone who was strong and ride his coattails. She did this and made it to the end. Good for her for winning!
Russell won the favorite player money. He was an excellent player. I wasn't surprised at all that he didn't win. I was surprised that Mick didn't get any votes at all.
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
23 Dec 09
Like I said before, Survivor is not a game to make friends or play nice.
As for Nat's strategy, that was everyones strategy. LOL!
Don't forget, Nat wouldn't be here if it wasn't for Russell & Russell only. If Russell would of just took Shambo instead, things would of been different.
People who play Survivor need to listen to Jeff & when he says "Please vote for the BEST player & not by emotions." do it!
Nat won because she was the sweetest person up there, not because she was a smart player.
If emotions were not in the way, you know Russell would of won.
But, in the end, America has still picked Russell as the best all time Survivor player, so he is happy with that... so, all I have to say is "GOOD JOB RUSSELL!"
@dawnald (85146)
• Shingle Springs, California
21 Dec 09
I don't understand those people at all. Every season there's usually one or two people who don't vote for the best player because they're pissed at getting backstabbed, but this was ridiculous. Honestly, it never even occurred to me that it would be close. Russell should have won on so many levels.
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
23 Dec 09
I know & the host Jeff has spoke out & has stated that he tells all the Survivors to please vote by who played a better game & not by emotions.
You know if emotions were out of the game, Russell would of won.
But it looks like America is giving Russell his title anyway.... The Best All Time Survivor Player Ever!
LOL!
Nat got lucky.... they only picked her because she was the sweetest person up there... yeah she is nice, but did she play a good game? Not even close to how good Russell played.