Man U lucky!
By abhikmjmdr
@abhikmjmdr (779)
India
4 responses
@ram_cv (16513)
• India
2 Jan 10
I think Hull were good value during the first half. But what showed up is the quality on the pitch. While United were able to provide the finishing touches to the few chances they made, Hull was unable to make an impact in the final quarter. I think Hull might just yet beat the drop, provided they can continue to play this way the rest of the season and manage to get one good goal scorer in the January's transfer window.
Cheers!
Ram
@rahul_2689 (634)
• Hyderabad, India
28 Dec 09
Well, I don't exactly agree with your comment that we were lucky to win yesterday's match. Yes, the team didn't play well. Some players kept giving the ball away too cheaply for my liking which gave the fans some nervous moments. But I don't think it was a lucky result. It was individual quality that saw the team through last night.
I might have agreed had we got this result against a better side like Villa or Everton or even Spurs. Maybe we didn't play to our potential, but it could be down to the fact that Carrick and Fletcher were deployed as defenders for the past few weeks. Give them some time on the field and the difference will be there for everyone to see. Man for man though, we were better and this quality in the line up saw us through.
@mejust (34)
• Indonesia
29 Dec 09
i'm not agree with your opinion. 3-1 is not the result of lucky win. If the result 1-0 you could say that was lucky. I think MU won the game because they had experienced players and great coach and also Rooney contributions despite he also made a blunder but he paid his mistake with a goal, an assist and contribution that end to own goal for Hull. He also had 7 shots on that game, it shows that he was trying to win that game.