Jesus and the money changers, act of violence or non-violence?
By EvanHunter
@EvanHunter (4026)
United States
January 6, 2010 4:29pm CST
For those of you who don't know the story when Jesus entered the temple one day there was money changers who were basically ripping off people, he got upset so much that he turned over their tables spilling their coins and drove all their animals out of the temple. Of course they weren't too happy about this fact at all. Would you consider this as an act of violence since it did cost them money/property. Or would it be more considered an act of vandalism. How do you think Jesus would feel if he was here to day and seen how the world banking systems are run? Some of the current goings on with the bank industries and the bail out they so desperately needed so they could all give themselves big fat bonuses while they evict the homeowners and send them packing with no where to go makes me think of the book of Ezra and how after coming out of captivity back to their homeland their own people were basically making them slaves again from crooked banking practices and all the lenders were forced to forgive the debts. Whats your opinion do we need a few tables overturned today also? Or do you consider this an act of civil violence and disobedience?
4 people like this
11 responses
@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
6 Jan 10
Hi EvanHunter, Of course I don't take the Bible literally and believe much of it was changed to suit the whims of the church back in the sixth century when the Bible as we have it was first put together. The story of Jesus in the temple is quite an interesting one and I think it's about the closest we get to Jesus losing his temper. It definitely shows his humanity. He became very upset with the money-changers and I think he would get very upset with what's happening in the world today. I know we certainly need more then a few tables overturned today. Blessings.
1 person likes this
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Let me clarify I agree about the overturning a few tables in today's time that is. As far as the changed in the 6th century I am aware of the Nicene counsel but most of whats written in the gospels has been carbon dated to the 1st,2nd century. I know most people only look at this encounter as being a product to point out his zeal for religion but I have to say I think its more than that. I think God isn't happy when people try to put a heavy burden on others. The one thing Jesus pointed out time and again was its all about how you treat others. Its my belief that things like this isn't just designed to keep you in a type of financial bondage but a spiritual bondage also, you cant focus on a spiritual life when you are over burdened on the things to do with material.
@PastorP (1170)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Hi Pose123.
I wanted EvanHunter to post back to you first so he gets credit, not me. It's his discussion. But what he said about the Holy Bible texts is true. Not sure where you got the idea about manipulation. We have ancient records that go back as he says to the 1st century. Although, unless there has been new data, the 1st century records are just bits of papyrus and not whole books of the Holy Bible.
When it comes to some contemporary translations though, aye, there have been plenty of manipulations. That is why I stick with KJV and NKJV. I know they are based on the Received Text which has some "additives" to it, but those additives are not in great contradiction to the ancient texts of the 3rd century and earlier.
2 people like this

@PastorP (1170)
• United States
6 Jan 10
Greetings EvanHunter.
I like how you post, making people think. I'm glad you brought this up because so often much of society views Christ as a "fluffy" Jesus.
I see you are opting for words other than violence, although, yes it was violent. I would also say strongly disciplinary! -- very strongly.
Sometimes in order to get a point across with some people one has to be this way. You mentioned Ezra. I think it was him that also pulled out the hair of some Jewish parents who permitted their children to speak the language of Ashdod!
Of course there is nothing wrong with what Christ did. These guys knew better. Their greed was the same as their ancestors. Btw, I understand these guys were being treated this way because they were inflating their prices at the expense of the poor.
1 person likes this

@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. I once had the very unfortunate time in my life to be on strike. It was very hectic and daily it was a push and shove kind of thing. I wouldn't consider it to be violent because fortunately most days things were peaceful. I do think that day there was probably some pushing and shoving going on just like the picket line between Jesus and his followers and the money changers. Unfortunately in today's age the money changers have even more authority and are well insulated. The men today also know better but of course greed rules them. I don't understand how someone can want more and more at the expense of making others suffer. Worse is it today if you object to things you need to be weary because you might have the government knocking on your door.
1 person likes this
@PastorP (1170)
• United States
6 Jan 10
PS-Chomping at the bits here for you to respond to Pose123. I'm still new to myLot, and I think, not sure, if I respond before you do it's credited to my general myLot rank and you might not get credit if you respond after me to Pose123. I think Pose123 is very much unaware of something about the Holy Bible that I would like to address.
Suffice it for now for me to say I would never stake my eternal fate on a book that has been manipulated. I fully trust the Holy Bible.
1 person likes this

@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
8 Jan 10
The Rabi, That's what I call Jesus, is pi$$ed. He wanted His church /temple to be free of greedy men and it isn't. I love the scene where he " goes Postal" at the Temple. It is my favorite. it shows the human side of Him. But then again I am not christian and I love it when an actor's chrtacter Has to destroy the set! With that said I think He was trying to make the point that His church/ temple should be Just for prayer. It wasn't a violent revolt. It was just a attention grabber.This is a guess coming from an outsider. so please forgive me if I got this All wrong.

@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Well said! I agree. Peacefull is a better choice and there Has to be room for it to happen.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. I don't see it as a violent revolt either. He definitely shook things up and that's what he meant to do. I think a lot of time people assume a non-violent approach means that you let people run right over you but somethings shouldn't be tolerated. When you make peaceful protest impossible, you make violent protest inevitable.

@1hopefulman (45114)
• Canada
12 Jan 10
John 2:13-17 (New International Version)
13When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14In the temple courts he found men selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16To those who sold doves he said, "Get these out of here! How dare you turn my Father's house into a market!"
17His disciples remembered that it is written: "Zeal for your house will consume me."
I would say it was an act of non-violence. The Scripture doesn't say he hit them with the whip but used it to drive them out of the temple where they had no business being. He was God's son and they were unwelcome in his Father's house. They came to do business there where they should have come to pray.
@artistry (4151)
• United States
7 Jan 10
...Hi there EvanHunter, Happy 2010, Well, if you believe the story, then I think the point of it was that they should not have been doing what they were doing in the "temple". Take the business of moneychanging to the street. Our banking system has, and I used to be a federal bank examiner at one time, been built on a concept of greed and speed, the more money you can get and the faster you can get, go for it. Those who were supposed to regulate were intentionally in some cases looking the other way. The Federal Reserve Chief, Goldfinger as I called him, Mr. Greenspan testified that he may have done a few things wrong, hello. Things were allowed to be done which put this country, and other global systems in a potential state of collapse. We are still not clear of the blowback. California and Florida have a 40% foreclosure rate, houses are sitting and nobody is hardly buying because now, they have tightened the credit regulations, good timing! What a mess. One-hundred and thirty-three banks so far closed or merged, it is still in a stare of flux if you ask me and we can only hope that the things the government is doing now will stabilize this situation and we can survive the storm. Oh it was, in my opinion an act of civil violence, but then He said "I kill and I make alive". So who is to argue with the Maker? "o) Take care.

@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. Gold finger...lol, I like that one. I was just reading something about the shadow housing that bankers have not reported that are in the process of being foreclosed on and if it was reported it would show we aren't in any better state of things than what we were a year ago. Unless you count the fact of those bank employees who got bonuses for Christmas that totaled nearly half of the money they borrowed from the government....

• United States
7 Jan 10
I find this topic very relevant today. The world is doomed unless we strive to be like the Lord and have the seriousness to throw the tables over on the money changers of today. The entire world has been infected by some kind of complacency that keeps us from finding the truth or doing something about it once it has been tasted. The truth hurts. No pain, no gain.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. I think in a way we have less freedom today than we ever had before. We have a greater physical comfort but we gave up our freedom for it.
1 person likes this
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Yes I have heard of some of these things already. Of course most people brush them of as just conspiracy theories but the truth is these people made things like the Wolfowitz doctrine and from what I see they pretty much are carrying it out to the fullest letter. I am not a big fan of anything done in secret and "for our own good". Anything done in secret usually ends up being for someone else to prosper off of and the majority of us to suffer under.
@scarlet_woman (23463)
• United States
10 Jan 10
that's actually one of my favorite stories in the bible.
somebody needs to do it again.
last time i took my mom to her church,they actually had an ATM in the front lobby.
i was pretty disgusted by that.
i'm sure now as then it would be considered some form of vandalism,but something definetely needs to be done about these banks with their hidden fees and debt that's impossible to ever pay off.they could renegotiate loans to keep people out of foreclosure,but they don't want to.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
10 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. I have never seen a ATM in a church lobby that's pretty bad. I do not think anyone will ever get the banking industry to slow down its paste of owning us all.
@Gordano (795)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Hello EvanHunter,
Clearly it was not act of violence, The Christ Jesus PBUH never used to act unjustly since He was Inspired by Allah in All of his actions ans sayings.
In fact the Pharisees used to Fool people for their own interest, and the answer was mentioned in the context.
Matthew 21:12-13
( 12 ) And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves.
( 13 ) And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.
people used to take doves to the the Pharisees at the Temple as mentioned in the Old testament.
Because a place called the House of God, should be Only for Prayers, there was a similar incident recorded in Islamic Books,
[i]Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah said, "When you see someone buying or selling in the mosque, say to him: "La arbaha-Allahu tijarataka" (May Allah not make your bargain profitable)! When you see someone announcing something lost in it, say: "May Allah not restore it to you"
[At-Tirmidhi][/i]
Extract from the Book Riyad-us-Saliheen book 17 Chapter 310
and Yes, I totally agree that we need few tables overturned today also.
Best Regards
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Thank you for your reply Gordano. As I said to PastorP the number who would disagree with a few overturned tables today is probably a minority but unfortunately they have insulated themselves pretty well so they have a tight reign on their greedy actions. I have to be careful in what I say don't want homeland security kicking my door in because I am speaking the truth! LOL. I only laugh because it beats crying!
@Citizen_Stuart (2016)
•
6 Jan 10
I don't think there's any real doubt that the incident at the temple was an act of violence. Jesus went in there and initiated force against the moneychangers. They wouldn't have sat still for that, they would have tried to stop him (and maybe beaten him up in retaliation, or else turned him over to the authorities). Jesus' disciples would have mixed in to protect their boss, so it probably ended up being a full-scale riot.
As far as the current situation with banks goes, I think the main problem is that it's not a free market. The banking industry is so heavily regulated that it's practically impossible to set up a new bank in competition with the established ones, so you end up with the world's financial industry being in the hands of a very small number of extremely big businesses - which governments then protect because they're "too big to fail".
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. Hmm I seem to remember the savings and loans scandal where a new bank was set up and they were related to someone in the white house at the time...No further comments...lol. Yes it is definitely an all out monopoly.
@6precious102 (4043)
• United States
8 Jan 10
I think Jesus' act was one of determination - you're not going to use my Father's house, a house of worship, to rob His people. As far as today's bankers, I don't see how Jesus could be anything but appalled at their behavior. What these bankers and financiers don't seem to have learned is that you reap what you sow.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
9 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. As a second point I brought up Ezra and what happened just to reinforce its not viewed as a good thing to place a heavy burden on people just for pure profit.
@levis143 (70)
• Philippines
7 Jan 10
What is the reason behind why Jesus acted that way? Why did Jesus overturned the tables and drove away those money changers and businessmen from the temple of God? The answer is because they are disrespecting and insulting God by their actions and they showed a total disregard and even contempt of God's Temple, which is a place of worship and not of selling goods or any kinds or forms of businesses. God's temple or church is not a market but a place of reverence and worship. That's the main reason why Jesus behaved that way, to teach a lesson of reverence and deep respect of God's temple, a place of worship.
As for the crooked banking practices, I don't see any relation of that incident to this present evil of usury. Love of Money is the root of all kinds of evil, and the banking system has a tendency to such extremities.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Thank you for the reply. Isn't also the body the temple of God? Than you could say that they are stealing from the temple by their current actions.
