Every religion and forbidden archeology vs the theory of evolution
By EvanHunter
@EvanHunter (4026)
United States
January 19, 2010 10:22am CST
There are key groups that seem to be focused on us living on nothing more than the constant process of material production and consumption. Why? because it is a process of wealth and power for certain controlling groups. Every religion claims there are other beings that were around before our current dawn of humanity that go back farther than the proposed 100k years that evolution claims we have been around. There is also archeological evidence that supports the claims that there has been intelligent life on earth long before evolution has been around but because of the current powers that be in the scientific community any evidence that is brought forth is dismissed solely on the basis that it conflicts with the theory of evolution. Evolution is not fact and just because you find evidence that contradicts it doesn't mean its not worth examining. Quite the opposite that means that the theory itself must be re-examined but the current heads of industry and technology would have to admit they were wrong and that we might just be more than the material beings we have been led to believe and than they might loose some of the power they have over us. I encourage you to look at the facts with an open mind on both sides of the argument, which side has more evidence? Here is a link to some interesting finds that contradict current evolution theories http://www.mcremo.com/
2 people like this
2 responses
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
19 Jan 10
Materialism alone is a very dry concept of life! The link you provided looks very interesting. So far I would think of these very old bones as pre-flood.. Not sure if this is related or not, but for a long while I have been thinking that the next step in theory, which is being blocked through fear, is the topic "what sort of intelligence is behind creation / the universe?" - The evidence for something intelligent behind it all is overwhelming, but the opponents are so deeply entrenched in their battle against the concept of "God", that they dig in their heels and cannot get beyond it, not realizing that "intelligent design" does not actually determine what sort of intelligence. Therefore the scientific inquiry, debate and thought is being stifled, which I guess is just another sort of "forbidden"..
1 person likes this
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
19 Jan 10
Thanks for the reply. If you are interested look up Virginia Steen-McIntyre and here finds in Mexico that predate an intelligent humanoid beings from around to 250k years ago. Two different types of dating were used to confirm the age of the dig site when word got out about her finds the site was shut down and all evidence was confiscated.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
20 Jan 10
Think you for the reply. My argument was that you cant take a theory as fact and you cant throw out facts simply because they don't support your theory. Thats not scientific evidence or method.