Should The Rich Have Their Services Paid For By The Poor?

Tweet

I am not trying to start a debate on policies, but ideas. The prevalent thought is that the richest should pay for the poorest among us to live. That sounds rough but it is what it is. The poorest have food but they do not pay for it, they have housing but they do not pay for it, they have education but they do not pay for it, they have health care but they do not have to pay for it, they have children but they do not have to pay for them, and on and on I could go. All of these food, housing, education, etc comes from somewhere, and truly comes from someone. That someone for the most part is the wealthiest. True we all that work pay share in some of the burden, but the vast majority of the burden is paid for by those we call the wealthiest. These people which they are people too, pay for their food and someone else's, they pay for their housing and someone else's, they pay for their health care and someone else's, they pay for their children and someone else's, and on and on I could go. We have created a system in which we are very charitable with someone else's money, we even have created a right. The problem is all rights must be universal. If I say that I have a right to my property, then you must have the right to your property, if I say I have a right to your property then you must have a right to my property. So the poor have a right to the property of the wealthy, but a right is universal and the wealthy have the right to the property of the poor. Now I do understand that the poor does not have much but they general have something, maybe an old car, a TV, and some other things. If wealth can be redistributed then all wealth can be redistributed. Just something to think about.