7 day notice to with draw from your bank account?
By laglen
@laglen (19759)
United States
February 21, 2010 10:08pm CST
""Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts. While we do not currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change," Citigroup said on statements received by customers all over the country."
This actually only applies to customers in Texas
What do you think of this? Do you think it will fly? Do you think more banks will try this? Would you stay with a bank that does?
http://www.businessinsider.com/citigroup-warns-customers-it-may-refuse-to-allow-withdrawals-2010-2
3 people like this
5 responses
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
22 Feb 10
This may be a federal or state banking rule that banks are required to post. It is designed to prevent fraud. What happens is someone opens an account and deposits money, in the form of checks, and then writes a check to withdraw the money. Several days later the deposited check come back as insufficient funds and the bank is left holding the bag. This is not new but is part of the openness of banks.
2 people like this
@Purdy52 (26)
• United States
23 Feb 10
Hello All, Aren't these bank accounts for depositors who have a substantial amount of money in these accounts? It shouldn't seem to matter to the bank if account holders had little money in them. Hopefully, this will never start in this country, but if it does maybe folks should start putting money under their mattresses instead of the bank!
1 person likes this
@LaDeBoheme (2004)
• United States
22 Feb 10
Whoa! Before everybody panics, read the whole article. This is standard of most banks with FDIC coverage.
The article also says, and I quote -- "However, we have never exercised this right and have no plans to do so in the future."
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
23 Feb 10
ladeboheme - I just looked at the article again. Where it states
UPDATE: According to Stoll, Citi issued a statement saying that it has been required to make this change by Federal regulations--and it no longer sounds like it's limited to Texas:
Update: Citibank has now released the following statement by way of explanation: "When Citibank moved to unlimited FDIC coverage in 2009, we had to reclassify many checking accounts to allow for immediate withdrawals in order to ensure all customers qualified for the additional coverage. When we moved back to standard FDIC coverage with most major banks in 2010, Citibank decided to reclassify those accounts back to make them eligible again for promotional incentives. To do so, Federal Reserve Reg D requires these accounts, called NOW accounts, to reserve the right to require a 7-day notice of withdrawal. We recently communicated this technical requirement to our customers. However, we have never exercised this right and have no plans to do so in the future."
was not there when I originally posted this discussion. Thank you for pointing this out.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
23 Feb 10
NOW accounts are different from Demand Accounts. They are interest eligible accounts and as such your deposits are actually loans to the bank which they pay you interest on. They need 7 days notice before you withdraw, because they lend that money out to others. Regardless of whether they've ever exercised this right or not, the fact that they could if they needed to remains. The fact that they don't have in reserve the total amount in deposits if everyone asked for their money at once also remains. Moreover, the FDIC does not insure accounts in full, there is a maximum limit.
"The standard maximum deposit insurance amount is described as the “SMDIA” in FDIC regulations. The SMDIA is $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, through December 31, 2013. On January 1, 2014, the SMDIA is scheduled to return to $100,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for all account ownership categories except Certain Retirement Accounts, which will remain at $250,000 permanently per depositor, per insured bank. "
@danishcanadian (28953)
• Canada
22 Feb 10
That's absolutely nuts!! Sounds like what we're experiencing, trying to get money out of paypal. Which bank is this? I am Canadian, but I do business with bank of America, and if they ever tried $h!t like this, I'd pull my money out of there, and put it somewhere else. Because I am in Canada and the USA so often, I need accounts in both countries.
1 person likes this
@ronaldinu (12422)
• Malta
22 Feb 10
I think this will cause a great incovenience for people to have to inform their bank a week in advance. I think I would stick with a bank that does not require me to notify them. It is such a nuisance. If one bank does it i am afraid that the others will follow.
1 person likes this
@LaDeBoheme (2004)
• United States
22 Feb 10
Did you read the whole article? See my post above. Everybody is getting up in arms for nothing.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
22 Feb 10
I think it's a forewarning. I am sure this rule exists to allow the bank to prevent "runs" on the bank. If there were a bank panic, they would not be able to allow withdrawal of all funds (they don't have all of them). By reminding people that this rule exists, they make me think that they believe that a run on the banks is a possibility. I think it points to how bad the economy is and the fear of financial institutions if things continue to go downhill.
1 person likes this
@LaDeBoheme (2004)
• United States
22 Feb 10
Read my post above and read the whole article (link posted in laglen's OP). Everybody is taking this at face value and jumping to conclusions. Most major banks do this to comply with FDIC regulations. They have the right, but that doesn't mean they have to use it and they usually don't.
1 person likes this