Sprinkler systems in older high-rise buildings
By ChewySpree
@ChewySpree (1832)
United States
November 15, 2006 5:02pm CST
Many cities' building codes do not require that sprinkler systems be installed in older buildings. I find this fact apalling because so many lives could be saved if sprinklers were installed.
What are reasons why city officials would not require sprinklers to be installed? Are saving lives not worth the money it would cost?
4 responses
@cpamanda (693)
• United States
16 Nov 06
I do not think there is a valid reason. I used to work in an old building with no sprinklers and it was scary. Also, my Dad, brother, uncle and tons of friends are firemen. It worries me all the time that they might be risking their lives to save people, when we are trying to save money. I think the elected officials spend money where people shout the loudest! Where they will be seen the most, not where the money should be sent.
@ChewySpree (1832)
• United States
16 Nov 06
That's a good point - I should write to my local officials about this too.
@gifana (4833)
• Portugal
17 Nov 06
I believe sprinklers should be mandatory. There is no such ordinance here in Portugal for old or new buildings. The building I live in is 21 years old and we don't have them. However, if the government passed a law saying that they were mandatory then the administrator would discuss the problem with the condo owners. Bids would be sought and the final decision for paying would be made by the condiminium fund which was set up for just such purposes. For example, the government recently passed an ordinance stating that all apartment buildings must have an emergency lighting system for the stairs. It was done with money from the fund. By the way the fund is also obligatory by law.
@gifana (4833)
• Portugal
17 Nov 06
PS: After reading my response I see that I failed to cite another possible solution. It should be mandatory that all new buildings have sprinkler systems installed during construction. This will add to the purchase price but wouldn't it be worth it? Of course maintainence would have to be paid by the condo owners.
@margieanneart (26423)
• United States
16 Nov 06
I agree with you. But, there aren't laws for it. And, peaple get paid off.
@earthmama97 (597)
• United States
7 Dec 06
Wow, that is really scary. I would assume the reasoning is cost or perhaps perhaps a building built to old codes would not properly support the systems?? If that's the case I think they need to come up with a new system that will work in these buildings. It should be mandatory in my opinion for public safty!