Two-Child Policy in China
By uniqueorn
@uniqueorn (1011)
Philippines
February 27, 2010 5:15pm CST
In China, the human population index is undeniably and alarmingly increasing year after year. Upon the growth of population, the demands for resources are doubled and the unemployment rate will eventually increase. The government has made a resolution to solve this problem - that, every Chinese family or household should have a maximum children of two only.
Raise your thoughts!
I personally don't agree.
3 people like this
21 responses
@Reyk22 (131)
• United States
2 Mar 10
I do not think it is applicable to the real world as people are now decreasing as a whole, despite the fact that underdeveloped countries have a load of babies, because developed countries have barely any and are decreasing in number(not the US because of new hispanics). The greatest losses are happening in Japan where people focus on work instead of family and have a silent racism against foreigners.
Do not find this offensive since I have sources from science programs and magazines, but do to the fact that I lost internet last time after I pressed the post response button, I lost my detailed 4 paragraph arguement and elaboration and am forced to respond without much detail as I cannot copy/paste.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
3 Mar 10
I am very much interested knowing your viewpoints about the natural balance of population - like China has an increasing population but Japan is eventually having a decreased population due to their priority of work. And, but unfortunately, it would give me more interest if you had given the accidentally deleted detailed four paragraph about two child policy in China. I must have had larger views and make sense out of this issue.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
3 Mar 10
As stated by one of our mylotters here, the policy is not true to all. The wealthy Chinese people have the privilege to have more than two children because they can pay the taxes headed on each or per children.
@ra1787 (501)
• Italy
28 Feb 10
I personally agree with this policy. We are 7 billion people on this earth, and many people are starving and live in miserable conditions, many people die due to the lack of food and water. Natural esources are not limitless and so it is not acceptable to believe in a perpetuous exponential growth of the number of people on this planet.
We are facing the limits of our environment, we either find a way to live in balance with it with a sustainable population, or in the midterm that balance will be imposed to us (as famine, drought, soil erosion, pollution, etc).
If the resources are limited it is better to live knowing that fact and avoid believing in a limitless growth that will only lead to massive pain for many people.
A two child policy with taxation as a disincentive for birth rate is a good policy imho.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
1 Mar 10
I second this notion. The limited resources cannot secure if the population grow beyond what the resources can handle.
@machivado (528)
• Indonesia
28 Feb 10
I agree for that. In fact, they should make that regulation 10 years ago. We should think ahead when it comes to having babies. We must consider environment around us first than our personal feelings.
The thing is this world won't never be ready to have that much of human population as long as we don't care to each other and the powerful ones still try their best to dominate others and don't give a fair chance and keep creating wealth circles around them.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
Exactly! As one community we should set aside our personal priorities and our overwhelming emotions but to settle for what is right and what saves the continuous existence of human kind and to aim for the next generation to enjoy what we have right now.
@gogierm4ge (398)
• United States
28 Feb 10
That is selfish, they might have been born in a 3 person family, everyone acts the same. He's wrong, but maybe you would slightly agree if you where there first, then you would say it's ok. (e.g We have different thoughts)
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
1 Mar 10
Tagging the government of China as selfish is unjustifiable. I, myself, think that it must have been hard also to those who constructed this law since they have their own family too. Maybe, there should be a sacrifice and risk to do to save the future generation of China. And I just don't think that families having excess children are punished by coerced abortion or killing. But only, there are taxes given per child. This way, families in China are warned to discipline themselves and use wisely and responsibly their freedom to make a family.
@slverfoxlover (10)
• United States
1 Mar 10
i completely agree with that, and see no problem i wish the US had that law there are to many people in the world, why would anyone want more than two anyway...plus i think there should be like a license to have children need a license to drive need a license to have kids now some may think that doesn't make sense children and cars are different, but they are not, cars you have to take care of for them to run longer, oil changes new battery etc. children are the same only cost way more to have and exist. feeding schooling houseing etc. AND just like if there is an irresponsible person behind the wheel of a car can run off the road and kill a few people, so can a child if it raised the wrong way it can run off the road of life and kill a few people...but anyway yea china has the right idea.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
1 Mar 10
I find it strange rather to put license per child born in this world. I mean, I can't picture it out. The license stated there must be equally pertained to birth certificates. Or is it just I don't get your point of the license you try to mean.
@kykidd (6812)
• United States
26 Apr 10
It seems as if this has been a law for a long time. I think I remember hearing that some families would give up their daughters for adoption because of the limit. Since they could only have 2 children, they wanted them both to be sons so that they could not only help work, but also carry on the family name.
It is definitely a very strict government. I won't say that I would agree that it is right, but there does need to be something done in places around the entire world so that less people are living in poverty. I am just not sure that this is the correct answer. It would be better if people would make the decisions on their own, rather than the government having to tell them what they should do.
@scififan43 (2434)
• United States
28 Feb 10
Hi uniqueorn, it is to my understnading that China has a one child policy only. unless they have recenlty changed it I am not aware. I aggres with you that that this is worng. that a family has the right to chose its onwn size. the plolicy in the PRC is to restrictive and violiates fundmentlal human rights. if a couple wants to have less than two children or no children at all, that should be there choice.
@dreamnishu (1247)
• China
27 Feb 10
Yes i agree. It's not bad i think.
Well i stay in china. I heard some of my Chinese friend that if you want you can take more. But some things you have to do for this. There is some policy for that. Well i also heard if your first child is boy then you can't take any baby but if girl then you.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
27 Feb 10
I haven't been familiar really to this concept since naturally I am not a Chinese. I have had just a preview of this Chinese law during our economics class. He failed to explain further details since we were out of time and we are going beyond our topic. I must do a research for this.
@Cutie18f (9551)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
Two is of course better than one. I think the same country had a one-child policy years back and to have this two-child policy is an improvement. Yes, a country has to limit its population if it has to grow, but this limitation should not lead to the race's extinction. So a two-child policy would be good. It is different in our country because "sky is the limit" when it comes to having children. LOL
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
I understand your point. That controlling the population growth is necessary to save a country from drowning due to population burden. As I understand your discussion and to sum it up, prevention is better than cure. But the prevention should be maximized to benefit and bring fairness to both government and the countrymen. Thus, China's improvisation of one-child policy is a better concept.
@anc457 (186)
• Thailand
28 Feb 10
That is so true, my chinese friend told about it and everybody supported the idea. i love the idea and it is a good way to help the people and the country. look at them they're booming. :-)
in Thailand, though there is no governning policy stating that. most families have one or two kids only. One example, my boss got only one child (a son)- he graduated last year, after his graduation, my boss bought him a new car, a condominium unit in Bangkok and a house in the province. plus a bank account -(savings for his son from childhood). This is a common practice for most families.
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
What I appreciate about both countries is their strong foundation of family system. Family, basically, as the starting unit of society, once built strong and sturdy, the community in a larger sense has less problems. Both countries strategically and sincerely gives much more value by making policies centralizing the good reputation of every family members than the improvising public infrastructure.
@chadott (61)
• United States
28 Feb 10
I had heard of this before, but I was under the impression it was limited to one child. And at that, I kind of always thought that I had misunderstood. But after reading some of the comments already made, it makes complete sense. I had always wondered, if it was true, what did they do if there were more children than the "limit"? I had not ever thought about additional taxes. I personally think this is an outstanding idea. Much better than what seems to happen in America. We get tax credits for having children, and instead of limiting the impoverished lower class to X amount of children, the government makes it so many of them keep having kid after kid in order to collect welfare. What a change we could have in this country if we were allowed to have a little more control over our citizens. Freedom is a great thing, don't get me wrong, but sometimes it seems as though we are allowed too much freedom for our own good!
@uniqueorn (1011)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
I highly agree. We have freedom but we intend to overuse it. Forgetting the responsibilities entailed in every action we do.
@Reyk22 (131)
• United States
2 Mar 10
This is not very applicable anymore. There was an article in a scientific magazine(Scientific American possibly) which stated that countries birthrates are under the global number for what is needed(also forgot this word) and that the number of humans is balancing itself. This article is not false in anyway and if you believe it is i am merely misrepresenting it, but it stated something along the lines of this.
(source: magazine article)
Many very developed countries(japan has it the worst, Italy and Korea to a lesser extent) have so low of a birthrate that the number of people in the countries will hit a point where it will be very hard to ever increase for a while, and will plummet fast. These places will of course have a stablilized population once it is decreased. The major contributing factors for the asian countries are racism and putting work before family. There is no outward blunt racism because that has been destroyed almost everywhere that is very well developed. However, the Japanese government will not recognize a person as a citizen (Ever) unless they are of Japanese or Brazilian Japanese descent. Other racism is limited to Japanese people shooing away their kids when they are around foreigners or even Brazilian Japanese. (source: reputable television show appearing on the Science channel in the US)
Note: I included this information not to go off topic, but to elaborate why this question is not applicable to the whole world(is still applicable to China if they are considered to underdeveloped to not increase greatly)
@lilyalone (73)
• China
10 Apr 10
I'm a only-daughter in my family and my most of my friends are also only-child in their families. It's really solved the unemployment problem but it also made some problems in children development, such as many children are selfish and loved blindly by families. So I think it's really not a good method.
@rogue13xmen13 (14403)
• United States
28 Feb 10
I don't agree with this either, and I do not agree with how girls are treated in that country. They can have two children, but one of those children better be a boy. I have heard this from a lot of people. The Chinese love boys. If a family can produce many boys, the better.
@agv0419 (3022)
• Philippines
28 Feb 10
I heard that too that China going to change the one child policy to two child policy. They need to apply for it before they can have another child. I'm also wonder what if we have that policy here we are also facing overpopulation here. In our neighborhood there has a lots of children here.
@magtibaygom (4858)
• Philippines
27 Feb 10
Hello, I'm from the Philippines. We're having the same problem and I think worse than China: Population Explosion. The alarming fact is, China has a bigger land area than the Philippines. You can check out global map to see what I'm saying. The size of the Philippine islands I think is only 1% of China's land area. But we are multiplying like the Chinese and our government is taking this for granted! Some government officials are being scorned by the Catholic church for initiating population control, I don't understand why the Church is doing that? As of now, there is no clear solution for this problem here in our place, and the only solution is to let the population really explode and the government to export humans to other countries like exporting manufactured commodities! :D
@satya4186 (279)
• India
28 Feb 10
due to extra burden of population china face a lots of problem. So everybody think about the future.basically demand is depend upon the population . if population will be increase then demand will also increase county will face a problem like food crisis.so china goverment make or update a new rule like
those family that have 2 children then goverment wiil provide u some reward those who have more than 2 children then Govt will be punished that family.
@Raniaa (66)
•
28 Feb 10
i agree wrote and not just in cina alone there are programs in Indonesia where are i live now promoting a programs called "familiy planning" so every family has at least two childern to the population in a country can be properly handled.
why you don't agree whit this?
@joebrpt84 (85)
• Malaysia
28 Feb 10
this is an ancient issues for china.. well i know the reason that they are doing this to control their population.. well i guess they make up this kind of decision after thinking it all through... then i say that we should respect others law... we may think it is wrong but it is not right to judge based on rational thoughts only... they maybe cruel but being cruel for a reasonable reason is acceptable for me...