The 'Offical Fox News Page' on facebook has been invaded!

You might not believe this, but I support their right to express their opinions. That is, I support their free speech rights if they allow opposing views on their own web pages. On the other hand, if they are not US citizens, they have a right to express their opinions, but they carry no weight since they are not entitled to determine anything about US policies. They should butt out of trying to sway Americans in any vote that applies only to Americans. "America finally did something good for its citizens, and those citizens are revolting and being an embarrassment worldwide." Lady, America IS its citizens. We the people, remember? And the people have every right to protest when the government decides to go against the will of the people, because the people are the power. What would be truly embarrassing would be if the citizens just kept quiet and obedient and let government take over every aspect of their lives. More importantly, it would be embarrassing to let the opinions of citizens of other nations be our most important determining factor in our nation's policies. We are not the world, we are America.

Ah yet again you display your ignorance for us all to see. Tell me Ladybug, who do you think runs those charities that take in orphaned and abandoned children? Do you think the women who work there dress as nuns because they think it's stylish? Many of the best charities who cater to the most desparate people are run by Christian churches. That's not even getting into how many hospitals, clinics, and soup kitchens are run by churches as well. I know this first hand as I've done fundraisers for an orphanage that was run by my church in Orlando, and volunteered in soup kitchens run by my church. Of course you're just too cool for church so you'd never lower yourself to go to one or actually witness any of the work they do for people in their community. I'd love to see you drop by my old church on a Sunday when the bloodmobile drops by and people are lined up donating blood that will save the lives of people they don't know and have never met. These people don't need the government to steal their money, skim off the top, and divvy up the rest. Good Christians give to charity themselves and by far donate more time, money, and blood than non-religious people. I know you have difficulty reading, but it would really benefit you to take a look at this and see the facts. Conservatives give their own money to charity, liberals prefer to give other people's money to charity and take credit for it as if it were their own. After all, that's what you're doing when you claim only people who supported this bill care about people and the rest want people to die. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/26/AR2008032602916.html

Rollo - the people who supported the bill are also America, and they had their voices heard. So, in essence, the government did listen to the people. Taskr - There are many orphanages in this country, and many are not affiliated with any religion. That is highly offensive that you would suggest that Christians donate more time, money, and blood than any athiests or agnostics or any one of any other religion. That is just not true. I don't disagree that you do spend money and time, but, its not any more than anyone else who cares to be charitable. We, in fact, go out of our way to spend time, money, tears, sweat, etc, to fight off all the oppressive inhumane campaigns the fanatical religious right initiates. If we are going to talk about difficulty with reading, somehow you missed my entire first two sentences, which apply to this case, the healthcare bill: "I applaud Jack and Pauline Urban for calling this what it is: Christian hypocrisy. The same people protecting the rights of the "soon-to-be-born" are not extending the same rights to those who are already living with deadly illnesses who desperately need medical coverage."

I don't know where you get your information, kennyrose, but I have seen Fox News, it is ALWAYS to the FAR RIGHT. They are so Conservative that it's classifies them as biased news channel. They are never fair when talking about politics and the Democrats. Hillary Clinton does own Fox News, again, I don't know where you get your information because that is false. Heck, Sarah Palin is Fox News Channel big contributor. Look, I have proof: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8453223.stm http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sarah-palin-debuts-fox-news-contributor/story?id=9545589 http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/01/sarah-palin-fox-news-channel.html Sarah Palin, as we all know, ran for VP with John McCain for the Republican Party in the 2008 Election Year. Now what does that say about Fox News? It's a Republican News Channel!