t-20
By bhanusb
@bhanusb (5709)
India
March 26, 2010 2:14pm CST
T-20 is ruining the art of cricket. It should be stopped. Do you agree?
3 responses
@burstingvolcano (13)
• India
26 Mar 10
I dont think T-20 should be stopped because of many reasons which I will discuss now.
Earlier and even now there was a cricket test match. Both the teams will play for five days and most of the time the result of the Test Match is drawn. That is wasting their five days, audience 's time and viewer's time all together for nothing(No Win No Loss). Later on one-Day Cricket came into existence with limited 60 overs per team. That was some what better than Test Cricket i.e it has a decision Loss or Gain, but it is also waste of time it will take whole day to see the result. Then One-Day international with 50 Overs was introduced and it is also somewhat waste of time but better than the above two. And Now t-20 came into existence where they can finish the play within 5 hours and also very interesting due to their boundaries and sixes and thrilling batting and bowling. In a short I can say 22 fools are playing and 22 million fools are watching the game called 'cricket"
@bhanusb (5709)
• India
28 Mar 10
I don't think five days cricket is the waste of time. The rule of cricket is so. Bradman,Sachin,Lara the great cricketers are the product of 5 days cricket match.
Skill of batsman and bowler are the attraction of cricket. Only to show the strength of wrist is not cricket. It's a game but not cricket.
@highly_addicted (41)
• Pakistan
27 Mar 10
i do not agree because test cricket and ODI's didn't lose their charm. i think T-20 cricket has lots of fun in it and due to its short period game it is more popular amongst those ppl who were not much intrested in cricket before. so i think T-20 cricket is developing the intrest in more and more peoples they will definately start enjoying cricket in the form of test and ODI's in future