Was H1N1 overblown?
By laglen
@laglen (19759)
United States
March 29, 2010 10:18am CST
GENEVA, March 29 - A group of independent experts will review how the H1N1 pandemic has been handled to ensure that the next global health emergency is dealt with better, a top World Health Organisation official said on Monday.
The H1N1 influenza outbreak, which began in April last year, was marked by controversies over whether the WHO and public health authorities had exaggerated the risks of H1N1 and created unnecessary alarm by declaring it a 'pandemic'.
The WHO has also been criticised for its pandemic alert system that focuses on geographical spread of the outbreak rather than its severity, and on alleged conflicts of interests between health officials and experts and vaccine makers.
The review will examine how well the WHO and its 193 member states prepared for and responded to the swine flu outbreak, whether the risks were fully understood or exaggerated and poor countries' access to vaccines, WHO flu expert Keiji Fukuda said.
"The bottom line for doing this is to identify what do we need to do to get better," he told a briefing.
About 17,000 people have died from laboratory-confirmed cases of H1N1 but the WHO says the real death toll is many times higher and it is too soon to say whether the outbreak, declared a full pandemic in June last year, is over.
Fukuda said an assessment would be made by the United Nations agency's emergency committee, but no date has been set.
It remains unclear whether H1N1 has been more deadly than seasonal flu, which kills thousands of people each year, but it is clearly milder than some of the 20th century pandemics in which millions died.
The virus has subsided in North America, where it originated last year, and in Europe, but there is increased activity in Southeast Asia, West Africa, and Central and South America as the southern hemisphere enters its winter, Fukuda said.
http://asia.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20100329/tbs-flu-who-7318940.html
4 responses
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
30 Mar 10
I think not! I think that the scare tactic was simply countered by several greatminds who spent time informing the public of the ploy. The manufactured swine flu was meant to be used against society, just like has been done before with other manufactured diseases such as AIDS, Avian flu, etc.
•
12 Apr 10
It has just been reported that Britain has 35 million surplus swine flu vaccinations.
The health minister in Poland inquired about the vaccine and was told by the company concerned that the country would be liable for any problems caused. They decided against buying the vaccine.
Britain had twice as many deaths from swine flu as Poland!
The vaccine was made available to people working in health care but there was a very low take up rate. You would think that they would be the people most at risk of exposure but they didn't seem too worried about the virus.
I heard that WHO had been asked who was responsible for declaring the outbreak a pandemic and they declined to answer on grounds of privacy.
I believe that there is every reason to wonder about conflicts of interest. This whole thing has been blown up out of all proportion. It is more of a mind virus than a physical one.
@valentinesdiner (1214)
• United States
29 Mar 10
Hate to say it, but we have not seen the last of H1N1.
Maybe the running around was to prepare us for the next time a superbug (like MRSA?) enters the community. Just hope that this was not a case of 'crying wolf' and making people more skeptical for the inevitable next time.