c-section then no baby. hello, heard of an ultrasound?
By Ritchelle
@Ritchelle (3790)
Philippines
April 2, 2010 8:55pm CST
it's in the news. a woman was cut up supposed to deliver a baby then there was none. it was a false pregnancy. the symptoms were the same as that of having a real baby. how come that woman, provided she was seeing a doctor during her pregnancy, wasn't ultrasound? and even in the hospital why wasn't that done?
2 responses
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
3 Apr 10
thanks for responding but how come i just got a psychology degree and i know this basic stuff already? peace 
@netcoder (275)
• Philippines
9 Apr 10
if the woman really undergo ultra sound then she must see on her very own eyes that theres baby inside her womb coz once a pregnant person go for ultrasound the monitor is there for anyone to see the baby, like movements of the baby and the position. so if she undergo c section and theres no baby then it means shes not pregnancy at all and she didnt really go for ultrasound and she just concluded that shes pregnant. unless the doctor take away the baby and just announce that theres no baby alone. esides theres also picture or image provided to the mother once she undergo ultrasound so she can just show that to the doctor only if she really undergo ultrasound.
@netcoder (275)
• Philippines
9 Apr 10
besides we really cant blame the woman if she doesnt have money for doctors check up and ultra sound. though in our country the hospital will refused any pregnant woman if they dont have check up history from them like even just 3 visit with the doctor so they will have history or if theres a recommendation from other doctor about her history then thats the only time they will accept the woman unless its emergency and life threatening case.
