Should Bush be tried ?
By funfreak2k2
@funfreak2k2 (1734)
India
6 responses
@goshimhappy (334)
• United States
13 May 07
He can only be impeached if there is proof of him committing any crimes, his views and decisions are not legally able to get him out of office.
1 person likes this
@funfreak2k2 (1734)
• India
13 May 07
i think it is possible to prove that he is guilty. everybody knew that there were no WMD in Iraq, but he invaded them. likewise, there may be many other evidences which can be brought into light.
@joey_matthews (8354)
•
30 Jan 07
Nah...
He's done quite a few +'s and yes quite a few more - but overall he's a leader who shows that isn't to be messed with. Most are sneaky and do things, bush is just hated do to sticking to his plans.
It's over oil.. okay, then yes he should. i'm confused now :P
~Joey
(joking here)
@funfreak2k2 (1734)
• India
2 Feb 07
thank 4 your reply. but i think he should be held responsible for the iraqi aftermath, if not tried. will that happen? ever?
@demo3424 (598)
• India
2 May 07
i think he should not be tried because he is defending freedom.freedom was attacked on 9/11 by a bunch of cowards.the cowards used planes as guided missile.the cowards hides in caves of afghanistan and pakistan.bush is doing his best to bring the cowards to justice.
1 person likes this