DC Obama is Ineligible for Office
@richlatino2012 (58)
United States
April 25, 2010 3:00pm CST
Members from all three branches of the Federal Government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds.
What they don't know is how long it will take for most Americans to figure it out, or what to do about it.
The diversionary search for an authentic birth certificate is ongoing and Obama has now spent in excess of $2 million in legal fees to keep that search.
Eric Holder's Department of Justice continues to deploy taxpayer funded attorneys around the country to file dismissals on behalf of Obama, denying all American citizens access to the courts as a peaceful remedy, which fuels the fire of discontent and the questions about Obama persist.
Michelle Obama states that Kenya is Barack's "home country." She knows, after twenty years with Barack. The Ambassador of Kenya has confirmed the same. His family friends all know it, and are in fact quite proud of the fact that Americans had no hesitation in electing a "black man from Kenya" as President of the United States.
The US Supreme Court knows what the constitutional condition of "natural born citizen" means. Even the most far left member of that court, Justice Ginsberg, is on record proclaiming that a "natural born citizen" is a birth child of TWO legal US citizens.
Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knows that Barack Huseein Obama is not eligible for the office of president, which is why she refused to certify the following language when certifying Obama as the DNC candidate for president in 2008.
This is the normal language for certification of nomination for president and vice president, filed by the DNC only in the state of Hawaii....
"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:"
This is the language filed by the DNC in the other 49 states, however...
"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:"
Note that the language which certifies that Barack Hussein Obama meets all constitutional qualifications is missing in the DNC documents filed in 49 of the 50 states. The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president was filed only in Hawaii. That text is missing in the DNC certification filings for all other states.
Whereas the RNC filed the exact same certification document, including the constitutional text for John McCain in all 50 states, Obama was technically certified in only one state, Hawaii. A mere inconvenient technicality, I'm sure...
The US Congress knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not constituionally qualified for the office he holds. Although the congress passed a resolution proclaiming Senator John McCain a "natural born citizen" as the son of two US citizens, no such congressional resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama.
The press knows that Obama is not a "natural born citizen," having written on several occasions about the "Kenyan born" senator from Chicago. A number of citizens have already been arrested and jailed for asking these questions.
Over four-hundred law suits have been filed across the country asking the courts to force Obama to become the "transparent president" he promised to be, and all four-hundred are being dismissed before discovery, all on the basis that "no citizen has proper legal standing" to ask who and what their president really is...
Over a half-million citizens have now signed a petition demanding to see Obama's birth records.
Numberous members of the US Military have refused deployment orders from Obama, on the basis that he refuses to evidence his constitutional qualifications to issue such orders. In most cases, the soldiers have simply been reassigned, so as to avoid any disciplinary action that could end in "defense discovery" which might finally force Obama to open up his files once and for all.
Now an eighteen year veteran flight surgeon and active Lt. Colonel faces court martial as he makes his demands for proof that Obama is constituionally eligible to issue orders as Commander-in-Chief.
Obama's entire domestic, foreign and national defense agenda has prove to be wholly anti-American on every possible level. Still, the answers concering who and what Barack Hussein Obama Jr. really is remain elusive in the face of unprecedented efforts to ask the right questions.
No matter who asks, how they ask or where they ask, not on single individual in Washington DC or even state government seems willing to weigh in on the most important issue of our era. Who and what is the man sitting in the people's White House?
Read the rest at this website http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221
And let me know your thoughts on this. This is one of the reasons I want to run for president in 2020 because of corruption like this. We need to bring freedom and truth back to America.
2 people like this
7 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
26 Apr 10
The president put a copy of his birth certificate online during the campaign but that wasn't good enough for the kornspiracy gang. I don't know how you can claim that the Bilderberg Group put Obama in office when an election was held in this country and the people spoke on that day.
@richlatino2012 (58)
• United States
26 Apr 10
I'm just going to let things happen and well if things turn out right then fine I was wrong but hey first off I never wrote this article. I found this on another website and decided to share it with people on here. And for barehugs I voted for Obama to be in the office. And eventually I was like wait he isn't living up to what he promised to do. So like the people that the news reported that would they vote Obama for a 2nd time I am one of the people that wouldnt. I am democratic. I just don't like the corruption between both parties. For 2012 I rather vote for another party than vote for Obama for a 2nd term. But once again I put this from another website that I found. If you look up conspiracy quotes from people like Henry Ford, and FDR just to name two you'll find they agree that there is a higher power that runs the country. Not the President. But hey I accept all peoples opinions on this even though I didn't wrote it. Let's just wait and see what happens. If things turn out okay then I was wrong but if things dont turn out okay thats on you all. Fair enough? To end the arguing.
@rudyro (110)
• Romania
26 Apr 10
First of all, I'm not an U.S. Citizen.
Secondly, I studied the US Constitution and i found no definition of the meaning of the words [citizen and natural born citizen], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
Thirdly, I think the "natural born citizen" aspect is just an atavic reminiscence of the past, when US was still within British Empire's spheres of influence and doesn't reflect the realities of the IIIrd Millenium.
In my oppinion the race, ethnicity, citizenship, nationality are values which are no longer compatible with the norms of modern society. The notion of nation-state itself is about to be thrown in the dustbin of history. In this context, i find it less important if Obama is a "natural born American" or just an "American", i find it important that more than 1/2 of that country's voters have chosen him to rule them. Democracy means "power of the people" and sometimes the people's will defies the current law (ex:if the Americans would have repsected the law, the would still be a British Colony).
Hope I brought some smiles;-)
@LillyBelleDaisyRose (285)
• United States
26 Apr 10
I believe that we should just leave his ethnicity alone.. COme on aren't there more importnant issues to worry about?
@richlatino2012 (58)
• United States
26 Apr 10
Qualifications for the Office of President
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of 35 years and been 14 years a resident within the United States.
Hmm I think you need to reread your Constitution because I believe you are looking at the wrong one there buddy. And for Lilly if we were to forget about it then I would have said let Arnold Schwarzenegger run for President. I would have voted for him instead. I think I would be safer with the Terminator as President :)
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
26 Apr 10
Your knowledge of the Constitution and the U.S. Code is very lacking for someone who seeks to be president. Below are the areas that cover why Obama is indeed eligible.
[i]The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes citizenship.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
•Anyone born inside the United States *
•Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
•Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
•Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
•Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
•Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
•Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
•A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.[/i]
@sid556 (30959)
• United States
26 Apr 10
From what I understand, only one of the parents has to be a natural born citizen of the United States. His mother was. Since she never married his father, she was still a U. S. citizen and so was he even though he was born in Kenya. Pretty sure he is covered and everyone in government office, the press etc etc are well aware of it and are not just sitting around waiting for americans to notice. I would say the Americans have not only noticed and questioned his right to hold office but they have been answered a zillion trillion times.
@cobrateacher (8432)
• United States
29 Apr 10
Are you serious?
The state of Hawaii and others have provided proof that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, which is one of the United States. There are those who choose to ignore facts in favor of bigotry, of course.
Can you name the people in all branches of government who know these facts to be untrue? How do they prove it? Why would they not have prevented his candidacy from the start?
Ridiculous!
@cobrateacher (8432)
• United States
29 Apr 10
Are you aware there is a political interest group in MyLot?
@bwaybaby (903)
• United States
26 Apr 10
That's nice. I wonder when people will realize that his mom was white and never. went. to. Kenya.
Ah well.
McCain was born in Panama. Yes, it was controlled by the US at the time. You could argue he wasn't a "natural born citizen." Due to the comma usage, you can say anyone who wasn't a citizen when the Constitution was ratified can't run. I'm studying Con Law. We discuss issues like this all the time.
Those soldiers refusing to deploy are spineless and pathetic. My father did not like Clinton. He knew the oath he took when he became an officer. You respect the office, no matter who's in it.
@redhotpogo (4401)
• United States
27 Apr 10
I'll admit its very strange that obama and his people are going through such great lengths to hide his citizenship status. Why? What is he hiding? That he wasn't even born on this planet? But whatever it was it doesn't matter. The majority of U.S. voters are ignorant. He was voted because he's a black democrat. That's the facts jacks. He had no qualifications to be president, and was a half assed senator. (Jabs the lemmings with a stick) They voted for him, because that's what they wanted, and he's president. No point in whining about it, or trying to change it. If the people want someone to be their pres that's how its going to be. No law can stop it.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
26 Apr 10
So, your contention is that this is a huge conspiracy, that everyone is in on, and that no one will do anything about?
My first question to you would be...why would every member of both houses of congress play along with this...especially the Republican membership? It makes no sense for them to cooperate by keeping silent, especially when it's only the congress who can remove Obama from office.
I would also like to know where it's written, either in the constitution or the military code, that a sitting president is required to *prove* anything to military personnel before they follow orders? In fact, the opposite is true. Enlisted and officers take an oath to follow the orders of the President and, whether they like it or not, Obama is the sworn President of the United States. As the wife of a veteran who bravely served two tours in Vietnam, I do not give any weight whatsoever to claims made by any member of the military who didn't have a problem serving under this president *until* they received orders to deploy.
Finally, heresay evidence is not acceptable in a court of law because anyone can *say* anything they want but, unless there is proof, this evidence is worthless. Obama has the same rights as everyone else in this country when it comes to defending himself against court actions. To suggest that waging a legal defense is a sign of guilt by him is to say the same about anyone who does the same. You, as well as millions of others who take two seconds to *sign* online petitions, might want to see the president's birth certificate but he has privacy and legal rights.
You claim to be opposed to corruption yet you support the denial of due process to the president and seek to corrupt our legal system and our laws for personal gain. Not very impressive.
