Is it necessary to rage a war against other countries
By manojt2
@manojt2 (179)
India
May 10, 2010 5:21am CST
Hi,
This feeling disturbs me very much. The politicians and top bureaucrats do not suffer due to the war. It is the common man who has to face all the problems when a war happens. Inflation rises, income level decreases, risks increases. The top level politicians and bureaucrats are not affected at all. In one of Sidney Sheldon's book, the hero of the story has a dialogue "The biggest farce run by government is war". I truly admit that. What about you guys?
1 person likes this
1 response
@o0jopak0o (6394)
• Philippines
10 May 10
well ofcourse an example is world war 2, when germany invaded poland, france and the other countries have no other way but to help its ally. so they wage war.
all that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing
@manojt2 (179)
• India
12 May 10
Yep, that's quite natural. But my question here is not directing to the other countries like poland, france and other countries who were invaded and then dragged into war. My question is for the leaders of countries who are over ambitious and try to acquire more land and they do this at the cost of other peoples lives, mainly the common man. For a common man, his motto is to earn a livelihood and stay peacefully with his family. But due to these leaders, the common man is also emotionally provoked which leads to Satan's ultimate goal, create fight between humans.
1 person likes this
