If Sachin was there....

Of course Yes. If he was there there will be a huge impact. Since India's opening partnership did not fire on the WC. Instead of selecting Murali Vijay, selecting Sachin would have been a good one provided that his form in IPL 2010. Also, his experience surely give a boost in the dressing room.

I think it could give India a great advantage, given the huge experience he has. Not only that, also the form he was in IPL would have been a clear advantage. India should think of including the master to T20s as well. It is still not late.

Ya ,surely. If the Legend was there it would have been another result. He was in a stromy form in iPL. He proved that he can do well in T20 also. But ,he is not their.............

Hi friend indeed it would have given India an edge if Sachin was there in the t20 world cup and his presence definitely would have made a lot of difference but we must also remember that Sachin is on the wrong side of thirty and so he needs to give rest to his body as often as he can as the cricket schedule of India is demanding and we need Sachin to play for our country for a few more years.So the decision to opt out of the t20 world cup is perfect.What is a cause of worry is the failure of the other high profile players like Yuvraj,Gambhir,Dhoni and Vijay.It's a shame that we haven't been able to produce a cricketer who can win matches for us on aconsistent basis and still look towards the master blaster to deliver the goods.

Yes, definately. The presence of Sachin in Indian team always lifts the team up. You may have seen duting the IPL that if the Sachin was not playing for the Mumbai Indians, the team looks down and out. Even just his presence gives any team and its players, an assurity that he is there to beat any challenge comes.