What is the difference between a novel and a short story?

India
June 15, 2010 12:10am CST
Hello dear members, Many people here in myLot have actually acquired their writing skill from extensive reading. In some of the discussions I started earlier, I found this. Now some read fiction whereas some lay more stress on non-fictions. Some reads poems and some loves travel guides. There is a variety of things one reads in one's entire lifetime. Everyone will agree that, among them, the most frequently read are the novels and short stories. Novels are long, written with detailed description on many things. They include many characters and events, that together form an intricate plot. Whether it is a tragedy or a comedy, we always find a sense of satisfaction after completing a novel. It seems as if we've finally achieved something in return of our toil. Short stories on the other hand, are like a snapshot of limited capacity, taken from our lives. Whatever they project is partial, the background is partial, the aspects and dimensions of all the characters are partial. Then the timeline is unexpectedly short. It fills us with dissatisfaction. Surprisingly enough, it is this tingling dissatisfaction that makes a short story a great piece of art. What do you think, are the possible differences between them? ....Which one between them is your favorite and why? Thanks in advance. God bless you all
5 people like this
20 responses
• United States
15 Jun 10
A short story is a few pages usually less than 25 pages and is straight to the point. It is one single story, no side stories. A novel may have some side stories and it can be as long as it wants to be.
• India
15 Jun 10
Hi, I absolutely agree. The plot of a novel usually have subplots, all of them are directly or indirectly connected to the main theme. They all add up in the end and form a general conclusion that conforms with the main plot. Thanks for your response. God bless you
1 person likes this
@mspitot (3824)
• Philippines
17 Jun 10
of course a short story is short though there are some short stories that are long but not as long as a novel. a novel is very long that it is divided by chapters. so within those chapters, there are stories.
• India
17 Jun 10
Yeah, Novel seems like a multimillionaire project, that goes on and on and on. You can complete reading several short stories in a single sitting, though it is not recommended. A short story is like an iceberg. It is not what it apparently seems. There are often subtle interpretations hidden behind the apparently pleasing look. Thanks so much for this wonderful response. God bless you
• India
18 Jun 10
me too
@mspitot (3824)
• Philippines
18 Jun 10
i like symbolisms in compositions. it interests me reading the story more.
@hanuma34 (819)
• India
18 Jun 10
As you have fairly described a novel is a long story. The description of the scene, characters, incidents and so on have to be more vivid. The narrative usually is gripping so that the reader immerses himself/herself into the story and becomes like role player. That is the reason when finishing reading of a novel one gets that kind of satisfaction as you said. In a short story the theme generally is about an incident, attribute or some moralistic preaching or the like. There is no need to elaborately describe the characters or the situations. All the same the narrative should be fairly gripping and the end clearly explained. Well, these days I do not read much, with the TV taking the time. Audiovisual entertainment contributes to the laziness. All the same I think I vote for a good novel, both from the enthralling aspect and literary aspect.
• India
23 Jun 10
Hi, You've used quite an amazing word here, 'roleplayer'. Yes, indeed, the success of a novel solely relies on the amount of involvement of its readers. In order to have this, all the characters are need to be perfectly visualized by the readers. To assist such a process, detailed descriptions are often quite necessary. Short story is just like a snapshot from your life. May be just an incident, or an entire day. But it stops there, often leaving the reader with an utter curiosity. Thanks so much for your contribution. God bless you
@amelly (1554)
• Malaysia
17 Jun 10
i like both..but i do look at the storyline first..there was one novel called 'versus' which is really exciting and i couldn't stop reading it..it was really awesome and the author used words that is simple and suits us teenager..short story does tempt me if it's a horror story, love story or even adventures..i do love short story with interesting characters, plots, climax and the storyline....but maybe because i enjoy reading..all types of reading material is okay with me as long as it suits me and it is enjoyable to read..
• India
18 Jun 10
The only horror novel I've read was Bram Stoker's Dracula. It was a huge novel consisting of more than 1200 pages. I had to read a few weeks at a stretch to complete the novel. It was a great novel and besides being one of the most successful horror novels, it has rich literary content. Horror stores are usually short stories. I have never read such a mammoth horror since I read Bram Stoker's Dracula. Thanks for responding. God bless you
@amelly (1554)
• Malaysia
19 Jun 10
really!!i think the most series of books i read was harry potter's books and all the twilight saga...it is so addicting..i mean i can't get my head and hand off the books..i feel like reading it all over again..
@CTHanum (8234)
• Malaysia
29 Jun 10
the possible and clear difference between them is the number of pages of course!!i love to read both- short stories or novels.the number of pages is not a matter at all as long as i enjoy reading it is the greatest satisfaction that im looking for.:)
• India
29 Jun 10
True indeed. If the piece is enjoying, number of pages really doesn't matter. The length is the main determinant of the type. Thanks so much for your response. God bless you
• India
15 Jun 10
A novel is a long story. A short story is a short story. :)
• India
16 Jun 10
Yeah, its kinda self-explanatory
• India
16 Jun 10
That's the shortest explanation and it's the truest of all...
• United States
15 Jun 10
It is length. A short story can have as many characters and as powerful a message but it is shorter.
• India
16 Jun 10
Hi Sarah, I agree. Short stories are like impulsive force, acts quickly and abruptly and finish unexpectedly . A novel, on the other hand is more like an Arsenic Poisoning Thanks so much for this response. God bless you
1 person likes this
• Philippines
16 Jun 10
I love both. When I have no time but I like to read, i read short stories. When I have more time and I want to fall in love, I want to read novels. As a reader, it doesn't matter how the novel was long or short as long as the story is in it. I love novels because it completes my imagination and the story gives a full detail of the characters. REcently I am not reading a book since i have so many important things to do.
• India
16 Jun 10
Hi, Every time you participate in my discussion, you fill the entire space with brilliance. You have an inherent enlightenment and simplicity, which is intertwined gracefully with your words. Novels, in a sense, are more complete in projecting its theme. Short stories on the other hand ends with a sense of incompleteness. It ends quite unexpectedly, and we are left with anticipations. Thanks so much for this participation. God bless you
@sminut13 (1783)
• Singapore
17 Jun 10
personally, i prefer novels for the reasons that you mentioned. it leaves me satisfied. the characters are built and makes me feel closer with them, as well as things happening around them. of course, i wouldn't say short stories are bad but you nailed it perfectly for me. there is a sense of dissatisfaction for me at times. i might not be able to completely get into the story sometimes although i can be quite picky. hehe but yea, novels tend to have more descriptions on the feelings and places and more. not only that, the events seem to unfold as if we're watching a movie. it's great.
• India
23 Jun 10
Hi, Yes, the characters are described in more details in novels. You get a clear understanding of all the important personalities that are mentioned in the novel. Sometimes its that sense of dissatisfaction that extends the theme of a short story beyond its physical dimensions. You are forced to think about it even after you've already finished it. Thanks. God bless you
• United States
16 Jun 10
The most obvious difference is in length. A short story is simply short. It's not meant to be a well-developed or substantial piece of narrative. Personally, I find short stories very difficult to write and unsatisfying to read. Short stories are just a snapshot, and it's very frustrating for me to try and compound everything into something short. I like longer works.
• India
17 Jun 10
LoL. Yes, they can be frustrating. But it is this dissatisfaction and suspense that makes them so unique. Novels are lot more satisfying as they have a sense of completeness. Thanks so much for your response. God bless you
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
17 Jun 10
The main difference between a short story and a novel is that there isn't nearly as much character development in a short story. They are written in one large block typically whereas with a novel, there are multiple chapters and the characters are described fully to the extent that you are really able to feel like you know the characters and you can put yourself in their situations. I like to read both types of writing from time to time.
• India
23 Jun 10
Hi, Yes the main objective of a novel is to prove its point through the characters. So it is really important that all these characters and the interactions between them are clearly visible to you. A very detailed description is often an integral part of a novel. thanks so much for your response. God bless you
@Cutie18f (9551)
• Philippines
16 Jun 10
Our teacher in high school always told us that a short story is one that you can read in one seating/sitting. Hmmm---I think that holds. I can easily finish a short story in one sitting, but novels will have to wait for weeks and even months. LOL.
• India
16 Jun 10
...for a person like me it may even take years. Cutie, for how long are you going to stay 18?
@alaskanray (4636)
• United States
15 Jun 10
I am dyslexic with the inability to visualize based on the written word. When I read novels, if they wax too descriptive, i.e. the color of the bushes, the way the vines twine up the wall, etc, I tend to skip through entire paragraphs and pages and cut to the action. I have to really force myself to read a book. A short story, on the other hand, is mostly action so it holds my interest. As a writer, I find myself in the same boat. I prefer to write poetry and short stories and have real difficulty writing a book. I have started one and got four chapters written on hard copy. Then I wrote three more chapters on my computer, no hard copy, and my computer fried so I lost them. I have been unable to rewrite them ever since. I started this book in 1983 so you KNOW I have trouble staying on it. I may just change it to a novella, which as I understand is a short version of a novel. Am I right??? My favorite work that I have done was a short story I titled "Mannequin in the Window". I have published that one on Associated Content if you'd like to check it out. I love beautiful language so Shakespeare and the older classics are fun for me, but only in small doses. I tend to use the classic styles when I write...resurrecting old words that don't get used much anymore.
• India
16 Jun 10
1983? I was born in 1983. I really love writing though. I used to write well, but that was a long time ago. Then I used to read 12 hours. I still miss those days. I used to read psychology, art, architecture, anthropology, geography, philosophy and what not. That was my golden era. As I am a student of engineering and currently looking for a job, its getting harder for me to continue that practice. I love classic literatures too. I personally think that those classic pieces had many things to learn, especially what I call a "pleasant writing". I don't find modern literatures as pleasing and witty as those classic ones. I have an entire CD stuffed with all sorts of classic literatures. I sometimes read them using a Text to Speech converter. I read those descriptions only if they are intended to create an environment relevant to the plot, otherwise I skip them. Thanks for your valuable participation here. I am gonna send you an add request right away. Please accept it. God bless you
• Jamaica
15 Jun 10
Wellthe differene between a novel and a short story is quit simple. A novel is a mor comprehensive piece of work that covers a broad story line over diffrent periods. It consist of many chapters and also many vivid characters. Its like a hook that keeps you reading without none stop. While i think that a story is a more condensed form of a novel. A story hits the nail on the head to say. It is much shorter and sometimes more discriptive due its short nature. It satisfies you in so many ways leaving you wishing it could continue. Sometimes has stated by you many people don't really get the idea out of a short story because the writers try just to get straight to the point sometmes in less than 300 words
• India
16 Jun 10
Hi, That was one heck of a response. Nicely put. I am very impressed. I am glad you are here. True indeed. A short story always hits the nail on the head. Sometimes, however, they have subtle meanings that are hidden so that the natural flow of the plot is never hindered. Welcome to myLot God bless you
• United States
15 Jun 10
A short story doesn't have to even been bound together as a book. It can be printed on a website, in a newspaper, or magazine. A novel is a book, simple and without much explanation. To say "I read a novel" would mean: you read a book. To say "I read a short story" would simply mean you read a story that is composed of around 4 or 5 paragraphs at more. It never implies that you read a book, it could be, but by saying a short story; no one would think it's a novel, right off the bat.
• India
16 Jun 10
I couldn't agree more. The difference is in their interpretations. Short stories do often look like an iceberg. There are subtle things hidden from the apparently amusing appearance. Thanks so much for this wonderful participation. God bless you
@kalav56 (11464)
• India
2 Jul 10
I love reading a novel but I also read short stories occasionally.However, I would not say that I have a sense of dissatisfaction after reading a short story.A well written short story would not have the time to dwell on details about characterisation and much is left to the reader's imagination.We have to look for signals and build on this to write a character sketch or an analysis. On the other hand the novel gives greater scope for the characters to present themselves and we are able to view different facets of the same personality because there are such instances elucidating tiny characteristics. Secondly there is scope for more than one plot to develop in a novel ; on the other hand a short story is better constructed if it focuses on a particular incident.Within the narrow range the good story writer does his best.If there are multiple plots the short story becomes disorganized and wayward. THirdly, if you take the theme, the theme would be of greater significance in a novel.We do have messages and morals in the short story also and simple short stories can convey this in the briefest manner possible.THe same is done with greater exemplification in a novel. In a novel, there is also scope for detailed discussion on various aspects of people or incidents. THe short story by definiton of its brevity would have to adopt a different type of plot,theme and rendering. Personally I feel that it is the skill of the writer that gives a rounded shape to characters and conveys a strong message within the narrow limits of a shortstory. I wrote a short story analysis on 'The yellow wall paper' which got a good number of page views in AC.THere was scope in this particular story. Basically , both are literary forms. THe novel is greater because of the vast scope offered.Recently I read a historical novel in my regional language.It consists of two volumes. It was marvellous and my remark was that it was in 'epic proportions'.THe descriptions were poetic.Now epic is another form. We cannot compare the incomparables. My favourite however is the novel.
@clowdine (1402)
• Philippines
15 Jun 10
I like both. But as for the difference, one thing I can't forget since high school is what my literary teacher said. According to her, if it's a short story, the main character is never absent in every scene. On the other hand, a novel may focus on different characters at a time.
• India
16 Jun 10
@clowdine That was a very concrete and wonderful explanation. And true indeed, a short story always has a central character, its kernel, and the entire story flourishes around it. Thanks so much for this wonderful response. God bless you
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
15 Jun 10
get, the short story and the novel are two literary genres under fiction. The obvious difference between the two is that one is short and the other one is long. Technically though, the short story is defined as something that could be read in a single sitting, whereas the novel is something that you read, put down after some time, and then come back to read again.
• India
16 Jun 10
...and use a bookmark. Thats correct. A novel can't be read in a single sitting. For a person like me it may even take years to complete a novel like Salman Rushdie's The Midnight's Children. Thanks so much for your response. God bless you
@knicnax (2233)
• Philippines
15 Jun 10
I think you already highlighted the difference between the 2. Novel are long and winding, employs a mixture of different plots, forming 1 general plot. It also follows different characters, different views or different scenarios. Short stories on the other hand usually use the typical plots like man in a hole, man in a tub and man on a road. Short stories can also be read in one sitting.
• India
16 Jun 10
Yeah. Sometimes a novel can be thought of a compilation of a few short stories, thought that may sound as if I am making a sweeping generalization. Short stories should be more appealing than novels, as they have to show their brilliance in a comparatively short time period. It needs real skill to write a successful short story. Thanks so much for your participation. God bless you
@oldchem1 (8132)
15 Jun 10
I don't think that I could say I like one ot the other because I like some short stories more than some novels and some novels more than some short stories!! However overall I would probably choose novels as these are what I do tend to read more of, I like to be able to have a little more depth in the characters and to have the possibility for deeper stories with plenty of twists in, having said that some short stories manage to do these things in a lot fewer pages.
• India
16 Jun 10
Hi, I agree to that. It entirel depends on the matter you are reading. Even some short stories are so boring that it never seem to end . Same thing holds for novel. Some times a novel is ended prematurely by the reader himself. And yes, there is a vast plot and wide range of characters in novels, each of them are gracefully analyzed and represented. Thanks so much for this wonderful response. God bless you