What the Heck is with Beck?

Tweet

I'm not that much of a Glenn Beck fan. I'll watch his show occasionally to see the types of stories that I know won't be shown on other networks. But beyond that, the guy's a bit too preacherish and fanatical for my tastes. But after my Internet went out last night, I started flippin' around my basic cable channels and caught a reairing of Beck's program. He was discussing "Crime Inc." and explained how it related to the Obama administration and other "progressives" he holds close. Pretty friggin' close, too, not just by loose association. The information really intrigued me. So far, I haven't been able to find enough about it on my own to either prove or disprove it. But here's the gist of it. BP screws up. Okay. Obama demonizes them, tosses them under the bus, and is blasting offshore deep-water drilling now. And in order to drive the point home, a panel of "experts" were consulted to read a report and sign off on the hazards. Only this report didn't say anything about wanting to do away with all offshore drilling over 500 feet. The "experts" read it, signed off on it, and then the administration added two more paragraphs after the fact (redundant but bears repeating) that stated offshore drilling will not be abolished for some time. So now the report is being used as an "I told you so" prop. Okay. So, no big deal here. Just another trick from the Obama admin. Even his diehard fans realize the tactics being used here. But meanwhile, after shutting off AMERICA'S drilling, Obama's sending $2,000,000,000 to a Brazlian oil company that plans to drill 14,000 feet below the ocean's surface for oil. Come to find out, this isn't just some run-of-the-mill company. George Soros is heavily invested in this company and stands to make all sorts of money if this company suddenly hits big oil and has no competition. My questions here: Isn't this crap just a little too much to be coincidence at this point? And does it matter to anyone that Beck is the one breaking this type of news? And should this be tolerted, ESPECIALLY BY OBAMA SUPPORTERS, that he seems to be infinitely more devious than Bush/Cheney with the whole Haliburton thing and other nonsense that liberals wanted to hang him for? I mean, if this is true, this means Obama and company will willingly damage our economy to give Soros (who is involved neck deep with these types of deals) a huge payday. And it also means all this "for the planet" crap is just a sham while they're all friggin' criminals in the worst possible way. Can anyone tell me it's not true, or even that it's not as bad as what it sounds like to me? Can one of the Obama fans--or right-wing haters--here explain this away without using "Bush" or excusing it with contorted logic? I don't know about anyone else, but this really ticks me off. Not so much that I know about it, but because I don't see anyone outraged over it or trying to stop it.