Should Ombudsman Mercedita Gutierrez resign now?
By TheAdvocate
@TheAdvocate (2392)
Philippines
July 13, 2010 5:01am CST
In her press conference, she said that being close to the appointing authority is not an impeachable offense. That is true, but sitting on a case that is potentially harmful to the appointing authority is, and is called negligence. Her excuse is that she had already inhibited herself from these cases and what she can do is tell the prosecutors to speed up the investigation. Why only now, five years from the time that she set-up the task force? That has to be one of the slowest investigation ever. If it were any slower, it would be going backwards.
Do you think Gutierrez should be given a chance to redeem herself? Should she be allowed to continue investigating considering that it has been five years and she has nothing to show for it? Do you think she favored the Arroyos in these investigations?
2 people like this
5 responses
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
13 Jul 10
I don't know.
but my preference for her resignation is that she is a classmate of the Former First Gentlemen, and that i think made her legibility in the position as ombudsman, doubtful. no doubt, it's imperative that the law should be changed in choosing the ombudsman, where it should be people and not the President.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
It is indeed suspicious that the President would appoint a classmate to an office that would likely investigate her wrongdoings. Her natural instinct of course is to save yourself. It should have been up to Gutierrez to show her impartiality and that she was not beholden to the appointing power. She has fallen short of this and have in fact been instrumental in protecting the First Family.
There is no law prohibiting her from appointing the classmate of her husband although delicadeza should have told her to refrain from doing this. It is clear that she has none of this and so we are stuck with her appointees. I guess your suggestion makes sense. We advocate separation of powers but we only elect those in the executive and legislative branch. I think that we should appoint all three heads of the government so that there is a real balance of power.
@dfhonline (130)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
Agreed!
Our law is very funny.
I find it contradicting to have a government official appoint an ombudsman whose duties is to investigate government officials.
She should resign, her motives are so obvious. But seeing how power hungry is her boss, thats far from happening.
I wonder what is Noynoy's strategy on this.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
It's probably because the people who enacted the law are the ones who are affected by it too. Sometimes our politicians can be so shameless.
@grayxenon (1313)
• Philippines
14 Jul 10
She should be replace by now, 5 years, 5 long years of wasted time, she should find something else to do.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
If only we could. From the Arroyos point of view, it's 5 years well-spent because in all the time that she was there, she had prosecuted none of her allies. She has to be one of the most creative person in the government, 5 years of doing nothing and making it appear as if something is being done. And to think that the investigation is still the first step in the process. By the time they get to court, all the witnesses would probably have amnesia already.
@dfhonline (130)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
Unfortunately, according to the law she still have 2 more years. :(
@rsa101 (38166)
• Philippines
13 Jul 10
I definitely believe that she has been a puppet of the Arroyo's in there and until now, she is still loyal to them. She cannot just do what she used to do under the Arroyo administration like sitting on the cases pending on her but she has to do something about it or else her position will be put in jeopardy.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
She has been loyal to the Arroyos to the point that her credibility is now in question. Although it is a constitutional body and therefore an independent one, it is still subject to public opinion. I hope that we can shame her to doing something right this time.
@mercedlegurpa (955)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
I think there's no need for us to wonder why; why these people who are still behind the shadow of the past administration is acting like this. I hope Pnoy will do his best as he promised during his campaign period to delete these kind of people from serving government offices because of corruption. The bottom line is corruption. And it is only here in the Philippines that people who are connected with our government offices refuses to resign. Though some of them were caught in the act, still they'll hold on to their positions. So if we say she should resign, well it will fall to deaf ears! I'm glad you have a heart to show concern our political status.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
15 Jul 10
We pride ourselves to be Catholic country, thus supposedly religious and moral. But it seems that morals and delicadeza has been thrown out of the window especially in the name of money and power. Resignation for her is not an option. If this happened in the US, the government official would resign.
@greenpeas (998)
• Philippines
13 Jul 10
Its obvious she was there to protect the Arroyos and her loyal fellow thieves from graft and corruption charges.
PNoy should not let this planted scum prevent justice from happening. Either impeach her or use pressures and if this witch still clings kapit-tuko shameless then have the entire Ombudsman abolished and replaced with a clean, uncorrupt group.
I am quite angry such pos works for Arroyo and my tax money pays for it.