Do you think high-tech should be introduced in soccer games?
By smallsaozhou
@smallsaozhou (827)
China
5 responses
@ram_cv (16513)
• India
20 Jul 10
I am definitely a big fan of having technology in games. Especially for momentous decisions like Goal line decisions. But I also agree that it should not slow down the pace of the game. I think a hockey style referral system can be introduced where in each team is allowed two referrals which they can make to the referee and he can refer those decisions via the TV Umpire.
If it reduces the errors due to referees, they will also feel more confident and will be able to make more correct decisions. Currently they must by under enormous stress for the big games!!
Cheers!
Ram
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
21 Jul 10
Whatever,I am glad that the officials are going to take action in this issue.It is a good beginning.
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
20 Jul 10
Yeah,I just quite don't understand why FIFA remains adamant in obstinate manner like that all the time.I believe that everyone wants fair match.So if the executives can't do that,our passion will be cut down to great extent and we will never spend a little in watching games.That is very very fatal to FIFA.So I think introducing high-tech is an overwhelming trend without any doubt at all in the future.
And I agree that pause should be limited for the sake of mellifluence of the game. Very appreciate your sharing your opinion with me.
1 person likes this
@Simon1223 (903)
• China
20 Jul 10
In my view, the introduction of high-tech into soccer games is an inevitable tendency. What I'm curious about is to what extent. The priority is to lay sensing devices under goal lines. Such measure could avoid the mistake in the game between England and Germany in the future. Of course never forget that referee should always play the main role in the game. The high-tech is only a helper.
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
20 Jul 10
Yeah,I agree with you that high-tech in games is an inevitable tendency in near future.Meanwhile,I have to say that mistake happened in cometition between England and Germany is very very rare in reality.(Maybe it is a destiny) But it has its great significance because it put forward the issue.
@skysuccess (8858)
• Singapore
19 Jul 10
smallsaozhou,
I feel that this issue of introducing technology into match refereeing is really long overdue and just cannot understand how the organizers have been to this day remain adamant against the its introduction into the game.
We have already seen how technologies have been successfully introduced into other sports like athletics, tennis, rugby, cricket, American football and many more. Most importantly, we have seen a stark improvement in both the quality of the game and refereeing as well.
Whilst, FIFA may be right in preserving the humane side of the sport but incidents after incidents have proved to spoil the quality and fairness of matches where the game has become more physical and deceptive over time. Time and again, we see injustice, unfair play get away with wrongful decisions from referees and/or linesmen during matches. More painful, to see it happening in high prolific tournament matches like the World Cup and the forthcoming Euro Championships.
I really hope that there will be a positive conclusion at the October FIFA meeting where it will look at implementing the whole tech package than just the goal line technology alone as there are many more goals resulting from un-spotted offside and diving offenses nowadays than a rare occasional ball bouncing out after crossing the goal line.
Half hearted implementation is just merely a waste of available and established resources. Most of all, it would only spoil the quality of the game, the true meaning of fair play and most of all the real enjoyment of the game we are so familiar and love.
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
20 Jul 10
Yes,it is obvious that we audience don't want to see unfair competitions so that we most support to introduce high-tech into soccer games.But try to consider the issue in another thinking pattern,maybe it will disturb the mellifluence of the match to some extent.Compared with other sports,soccer has its unique particularity.There is no pause during the game except the 15 minutes' break.That is quite differnt from other games such as tennis or basketball.We can't imagine some players to ask for a pause to watch the playback for the sake of fairness when they are still in competition.Perhaps that's one of the reasions why FIFA deny introducing high-tech.
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
19 Jul 10
Yeah,I agree with you.More progress should be made in each different domain.Thank your for your sharing.
@LingXX0103 (151)
• China
19 Jul 10
There is a same discussion on TV yesterday. : )
For my opition,I dont think that it is nessery to recommend it into soccer games.
Sometimes mistake is a piece of soccer games.
If FIFA introduce eagle eye(I don't know whether this word is correct),perhaps we will forget many great games.
For example,the final between England and Germany in 1966.
I believe that so many fans remenber this game all the time.And the reason is referee's fatal mistake.
Of course,high-tech will make games more correct,but games lose her interesting as well.
@smallsaozhou (827)
• China
19 Jul 10
Yes,I have also watched the programme.Is that called Speak loudly? But I am afraid I don't agree with your opinion.You know,circumstance like what happened in 1966 can't take place again nowadays because our technique in television broadcast is higher and higher.Now we can see playback easily so that we won't make a mistake like that in 1966.Whether the goal is in or not in 1966 can't be defined easily,but almost everyone have admitted that the refree has make a severe mistake in the competition between England and Germany.I can't still consider the mistake as a fascinating fantasy after I have already known the truth.It is not fair at all,and it is against the basic principle put forward by FIFA so that they sink into contradiction.