Elena Kagan SCJ
By k15682
@k15682 (300)
United States
6 responses
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
6 Aug 10
What's a plop synonym? Just curious since I might have already used it below but I really don't know what it is so I can't tell.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
6 Aug 10
Yes, I'm very pleased. This is the first time ever that three women have been on the court. I'm also happy because she's an Obama appoinntee. But that's the luck of the draw.
@k15682 (300)
• United States
6 Aug 10
Taskr, the ONLY reason gender matters IMO is because the job of the SCOTUS is to follow the constitution. This often time means trying to figure out what our founding fathers intended...hmmm maybe Sylvia Brown. We all know that men and women think differently, hence the only reason gender would matter.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
6 Aug 10
No, I'm not. I'm not happy with another judicial activist, nor am I happy that we now have an anti-military judge that wouldn't even allow recruiters to operate at Harvard when she was dean. The Supreme court ruled unanimously that she was wrong to do so and that includes even left wing judges like Ginsburg.
The fact that she has zero experience as a judge is a distant third in reasons why I'm not happy with her confirmation.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
6 Aug 10
Depends. If she can keep her political ideology out of her rulings then yes. However, from what I do know so far it seems more likely she will probably be an activist. I do not want my supreme Court Judges to be either conservative or liberal, there is no place for either ideology in a ruling. A Supreme Court Justice should be one thing and one thing only...constructionist. They should follow the letter and original intent of the constitution and nothing more.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
6 Aug 10
I believe it should be the best person for the position-regardless of race or gender. If she follows the constitution, I'll have no problem with her but she still wasn't the best person.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
6 Aug 10
No not really...but for only one reason...she did not have any experience as a judge or as a lawyer. She has spent her whole career in politics or teaching. I would have perfered someone who had more on the job experience...but I guess she is going to get "on the job" training now.
I really don't think we should have people on our supreme court that not well experienced in being a judge and/or a lawyer that practiced in a court of law. But that is just my opinion.