Must formal school really hasten childhood's carefree phase?
By eileenleyva
@eileenleyva (27560)
Philippines
August 8, 2010 5:40pm CST
My cousin called me up yesterday. She had been worrying about her daughter in first grade. The child left the classroom in the middle of a seatwork. Apparently, she did not want to answer the questions anymore. The questions were about who invented the computer, when did the world wide web come into the being, etcetera. My niece would have tinker hands on. She likes drawing and spelling. She's also good in math. She can multiply several digits. (NB: I started learning the table of 3 in Grade 3) My niece is 7 years old and she can tell nutritious food from junk. She knows all the go, grow, glow chart by heart. But must she remember who invented the computer. I don't even know who that guy is and I know I must thank him. Gosh, had I been in that classroom, I would have given my test paper back to the teacher without answers, too. My niece was found in the chapel, crying and praying.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@ptower76 (1616)
• United States
9 Aug 10
I don't know if history of the computer is an appropriate subject to teach first graders but then again, I am not an expert in that field. What I know is that children must also learn to deal with those things they are not familiar with. We cannot go through life experiencing only those things that we are familiar with. Your niece seems to be very intelligent and so supporting her decision to leave the clasroom when new materials are presented may hurt her in the long run since she will then concentrate only on those things she feels is important or that she is familiar with. I think that defeats the purpose of school. Instead, it may be beneficial to suggest to her that examining topics and subjects that are unfamiliar and learning and doing well in them is a true test of cognitive ability. I don't think you would have given you paper back to the teacher without answers right? It would have meant failing. And in first grade that is one of the most important things to a child's development as well as to the child's ego. Learning how not to fail as well as accepting one's possibilities of failure are a challenge most first graders face. Its funny though because you niece chose to seek spiritual guidance when dealing with her inability to transcend. Spiritual therapy is the best way to enhance one's ability to transcend life's obstacles. I think she will be ok. Let her spread her wings so that one day she can soar and be able to reach even her highest goals.
1 person likes this
@lmurdock (56)
• United States
9 Aug 10
I have to agree. The subject matter that was being covered in the elementary classroom is largely irrelevant. One of the objectives of formal education is to teach kids new things, expose the students to new ideas, etc. Becoming easily frustrated with a new or challenging task can mean a lot of things. One may well be that the child just needs to be re-assured that she is not a failure when she fails to recall specific details or recognize new things. The most troubling aspect of this school incident is the fact that the child felt compelled to run away, rather than ask questions. Is there some reason she did not feel comfortable voicing her frustration to the teacher? That is not an indictment on the teacher. It may be as ptower said that she has to learn that failure is not fatal. I also think that there is hope in that she seeks solace and encouragement from her faith.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
Asking permission to copy your answers verbatim and show them to my cousin.
@romzz05 (572)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
Wow im surprised that grade 1 students study those things. When i was in grade one the major things i learned is the alphabet and the national anthem etc but not who invented the computers i don't even know how to multiply back in grade one just basic addition and my subtraction is bad. I couldn't even draw a decent apple. Talk about information overload, i really dont know if it will be good for children in the long run to learn such advance subject in such an early age but time change.
1 person likes this
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
romzz, kathy, honestly, I can't remember 1st grade. 3rd grade is vivid because our Math teacher carried a meter stick to punish those who cannot recite correctly the multiplication table. I was not punished, thank God.
You guys are right, the information overload can complicate learning.
@kathyglim (183)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
I don't know who invented the computer. It never crossed my mind to check on it. When I was in grade 1, we didn't bother to know what a computer or who invented. We studied the alphabet, addition and subtraction not even multiplication. My kid is now 9 years old and in Grade 1, I can't remember they discussed who invented the computer. Is this appropriate or the system is just injecting a lot of things to the kids which makes it too complicated for them. Are they ready to absorb the things they are taught as this age?
@ptower76 (1616)
• United States
9 Aug 10
you know, now that i think on it a bit more, first graders today are actually using computers. I can think of a couple of children of that age that know more about computers then their parents. Of course when i was that age this was not the case. But with the advance in technology in society today, history about computers as long as it is kept at a level the children can understand may indeed be appropriate.
@suryachalla (1369)
• India
9 Aug 10
That is the only age when reason, logic and sense should be instilled in a child. As you are very aware, the human mind is like a hair that can snap easily. A trained mind will stand in good stead when the child grows up, giving the ability to withstand ethical and moral issues that might burn up uneducated or partly educated people. Moreover, only a tender brain put under stress can dream of great things, great achievements.
I still believe in formal education. It is the one thing that makes life worth living.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
I am not sure about the metaphor. My hair doesn't snap easily. Especially so when in locks. But all the other things, I agree, absolutely. Still I wouldn't want to memorize names. That is why I was poor in history, I suppose.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
9 Aug 10
suryachalla, Justin Beiber's hair is cute but I'd go for Jason Castro's locks. JC - American Idol contender 07.
Tinker hands on - that was literal. We use hands on when we are actually using the computer, as opposed to lecture when we are studying the terms and the theory. Definition circa 1987, ha ha! Hands on had taken a new meaning now. I hear parents ask questions like Are you hands on with your children?
I am for formal education, too, suryachalla, but sometimes, what the curriculum is feeding is not appropriate to the child. I know it is never too early to teach something but I also believe that there is a time for everything. Learning the names and the dates are all right, but not for a 7 year old. Asking them to memorize such things won't have meaning in their young lives. Justin Beiber would have been more relevant. Just kidding!