Deadliest warrior or Dealiest weapons
By rovian
@rovian (1924)
United States
August 11, 2010 6:18pm CST
I use to find the TV show, Deadliest Warrior, interesting but it began to get boring. Especially those guns vs guns episodes. Should gun users be called warriors? The battles at the end of the episodes are still interesting. For a television show like this with its name, they ignore everything about the warriors and only focus on the weapons. If you give a bazooka to a small child, and a rifle to a trained soldier, who would win? The people on this show would probably say the kid because a bazooka is deadlier than a rifle.
1 person likes this
1 response
@Phaedra_Scythe (3325)
•
29 Sep 10
I agree with you totally. It's interesting learning about the weapons, but my partner loves the show and watches it all the time and I'm really starting to lose interest.
I'm responding now because my partner is currently watching the show as I type. Musketeers vs. Ming warriors. I'm just not into it any more. It seems so formulaic. They have to try and give the sides equal points until the end to keep the winner mystery. The skills and mindsets of the warriors don't seem to factor enough at all.