How do you see Obama's support of the Ground Zero' s Mosque
By billzehua
@billzehua (573)
China
August 17, 2010 10:41am CST
One of the heatedly-discussed things now among the folks is the construction of a mosque in the Ground Zero, a place where the deepest trauma of 3000 American families lies. A CNN poll showed that 70% of the public were opposed to this decision, while Obama set a lead to open its arm more open to the Muslim world.So if I approve of his decision, does that mean Obama is a very lenient president? Absolutely no! To me, this is a too simple and hasting conclusion.First of all, I think the majority's grudge is understandable ever since 9/11. It's a day that tore the Americans apart and set a breach between the western world and Muslim countries. It goes the same as us Chinese towards Japan. Though the war has gone, and the two countries have revived its diplomatic tie many years ago,you can dig deep into folks' heart and feel the sense of hatred. We have been engrafted to be forgiven and peaceloving, but at the same time we were kept reminded of the days of infamy. That sense of hatred has built up the waves of anti-Japanese goods in China in the past years. So where should we stand in this scenario? Years ago, there's also a similar incident aroused in China. Starbucks extended its foothold into the Forbidden City and instantly it was overwhelmed by loud outcry from the public, and actually I was one of those voices then. I call it a resemblance because in both situations I see a dilemma posed upfront that one culture is trying to ''take over' another. It's not really a take-over, but we could feel the intensity inflicted by the new comer on the supposedly pure place where it should only preserve things of our own. Chinese believed Forbidden City was a legacy handed down from our ancestors and should observe its originality. And I also believe the landing of the mosque out of nowhere would be a sharp discordant voice to its originality. Now I again want to refresh the Starbucks case I mentioned above. The ultimate reason I stood against Starbucks' market strategy was not that I was discontent with its market occupation or felt the sense of compulsory intrusion, but its indiscretion to break the symphony of the treasurable legacy belonging to all human kind. Since Obama's first speech to the whole Muslim world in Cairo, I have been impressed once again by American's openness by its setting up the first Muslim college in California. However in this case, I think it'd wiser to build the mosque elsewhere so that Americans coming to New York do not have to be compulsorily reminded the day of infamy and sorrow. 'The writ of our founders must endure', very good and inspirational words to the whole world, but still I still believe the founders of the writ hadn't thought of a break of symphony of the most developed city in the world densely dotted with sky-high mansions just by the landing of a mosque.
2 people like this
6 responses
@goldeneagle (6745)
• United States
18 Aug 10
Obama skirted the issue of how he felt about them building a mosque near Ground Zero, except to basically say that they have a LEGAL right to build there. However, we have to remember that, although he won't admit it, Obama IS a muslim, so I am pretty sure he is not opposed to the idea...
1 person likes this
@billzehua (573)
• China
20 Aug 10
Hi,goldeneagle, thanks for sharing!
you know, you got it right that he skirted the issue of how he felt abt them building a mosque near Ground Zero, but from the second part of your words, I smelled a sense of dislike to the Muslim? Am I right? hehe. I recalled the situation when some Chinese people were also very agitated to direct their anger toward the whole country Japan, and that's nationalism rather than patriotism. So I can expect quite parts of people among that 70% interviewed have been engaged into a unhealthy debate.
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
18 Aug 10
I see Obama's decision to support the Muslims as him not listening to the American people and him not understanding the hurt of those who lost loved ones on 9/11. It is the same as you Chinese would feel if that Japanese would want to build a Shinto Temple in one of the cities where they massacred thousands of your countrymen.
The pain is too great and it would be an insult to the family of the victims.
Build the Mosque elsewhere and it is no necessary since there are already so many in the city.
I think the Starbucks is different in that you have to keep the atmosphere in the Forbidden City the same as it was before. We have a similar situation in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island in Canada. They are trying to preserve its historical value so any building put there has to look as if it was built in the 1800s and not in the 20th or 21st century.
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
21 Aug 10
Sorry for the repeat, but I was trying out my busband's laptop. Not that good at it or else I do not have the stand down far enough. And thanks for the best response.
@billzehua (573)
• China
20 Aug 10
You hit the core very precisely, if 70% of the folk held against it, then he should have gone down to hear those voices and soothen the pain.Before I thought it hard to understand why so many Americans were taking China as a threat and went so crazy cricizing China's dumping export, why they were so hateful abt Chin's huge quantities of cheap production.but now I begain to sense that whichever part is correct, at least many Americans are suffering because of something, which could be directly or directly linked to China's rise, and just for that, their voices deserve to be heard and dignosed with feasible cures.
1 person likes this
@AmbiePam (92711)
• United States
18 Aug 10
I see it as bad and insenstive. And that's just the way I see it. People can disagree with me, agree with me, that's my feeling, and it will stay that way. I think making a politically correct statement about it seems to be the most important thing about the situation to him. I would hope more people would listen to the survivors and the ones who lost the loved ones than anyone else. It's just a matter of tact and respect. Something a lot of people involved in the situation don't seem to have. (And no, Obama fans, that was not a direct insult to him. I'm talking about everyone who got this going, has approved it...)
@lillysus21 (73)
• United States
18 Aug 10
I don't think there is anything wrong with it. The Muslim religion is not responsible for what happened on 9/11. The responsibility lies with some sick wicked individuals, and if they called themselves Muslim it was a twisted version. Most Muslim people who practice and believe in what the Muslim religion actually teach abhor what happened that day. In this land where we are supposed to have equality and freedom of religion I don't believe we should ostracise the Muslim religion with the misguided notion that it is responsible for 9/11.
@billzehua (573)
• China
20 Aug 10
hi,lillysus, you are very eloquent to challenge me that I was wrong from the scrath,coz you wanted me to believe that Muslim has nothing to do with the 9/11. I have to agree with you but it'd be hard for me to challenge you.If we go from the war's perspective, it's not a war called anti-muslim, it's just a war called anti-terrorism.unfornately most of us now believe that those countries had harbored some of the lethal terrorists, intentionally? accidentally? naturally? I don't know, I don't read news too much.So I can't disagree with you.
@jupitercrashing (635)
• Canada
17 Aug 10
Er, there are plenty of mosques in New York already, and a couple within the same distance as the new proposed mosque. It is not being built on ground zero. It is being built over a mile away, in an old building that used to host a Burlington Coat Factory.
It doesn't matter where muslims decide to build mosques, American bigots will always be against it.
@ania66 (78)
• Philippines
18 Aug 10
The enforcement of the laws of the land is the main function of the Executive branch (President) of the government. Hence, there was nothing offensive when Pres. Obama allowed the building of the proposed mosque and community center because of the "legality" thing.