There are so many U.S. Bases in the World :D
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
Philippines
August 18, 2010 11:54pm CST
Hello Lotters,
I hope you don't take this negatively, because it's something that i noticed for a long time, but refuse to comment about it, sometimes i think it's for a good/bad cause.
Why is it that there are so many US Bases in the World, although not as many as before since one of them got removed from the Philippines (except for VFA). there are still bases in Asia, Europe(i think), and the Middle East. just imagine how much the Government is paying to all of this countries for renting part of the Land.
I could say, US government is spending a lot in terms of Military. No wonder a lot of people hated the War, because it was too expensive(not to mention lost lives).
There are a lot of potential growing bases across the world, but i haven't seen one having a Base on another country..only in the US. unless i miss something (pls. tell me)
Do you think US bases should be retain or removed?
Your Views..thank you.
6 people like this
14 responses
@BigTips (304)
• China
19 Aug 10
You know, the US is often considered the most powerful country all over the world; So, it is not so amazing that they have built bases in various parts of the world, such as Japan, Middle East, etc.
In fact, apart from U.S.A, there are also some other countries that have interests in building bases in other countries. For example, you can also find some bases built by Russia. The US is a super country and they need these bases to take some countries under control.
I have no idea about the bases because it is the US that have the power to retain or remove these bases. Of course, all their actions will be based on the profits of U.S.A.
2 people like this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello Bigtips,
I know they have strategic purposes but i strongly doubt they are earning from those bases, nope they are spending on it, knowing that they had to pay more money in the foreign government.
4 people like this
@ania66 (78)
• Philippines
19 Aug 10
This is just a showing of how the US is serious in maintaining the superpower that it has today. The locations of these US military bases are so strategic as it was able to implant its bases on countries such as the United Kingdom and Germany (also are superpowers), Japan and Saudi Arabia (Economically-developed countries), Afghanistan and Iraq, (I can't find the right word ;)) etc. In such a way or another, these countries have succumbed into the power and influence of the United States of America. The presence of these bases and these people in other territories is an encroachment into these countries sovereignty. I would therefore want to be removed.Peace Out :)
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
19 Aug 10
The bases in Japan and Germany directly resulted from World War II. Those countries started that war and the bases and military presence was necessary to ensure they did not start another one. Most people thought spanking Germany in WWI was enough to prevent them from becoming aggressive again, but the opposite happened. Those bases are the reason for such a long period of peace in those countries.
Saudi Arabia welcomed the US to protect them from Iraq when they became aggressive. I don't think I have to explain Afghanistan. You really should study history so you'll better understand the purpose of these bases.
That said I do believe the bases in Germany and Japan have served their purpose and should be closed as it will save us a LOT of money.
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello Ania,
I think am starting to see why these bases really do exist, not just for power but also for added security as well. for the base in the middle east, the purpose of that is to provide protection to those countries who in a threat with other countries.look at South Korea, they need the Presence of the US base because of the Aggressive side of the North.
you're right Taskr36, what purpose may serve in having a Base in Germany and Japan whereas the war with them back in 1940's was well over. and i don't think they have the resources or the way of thinking to start the war again. despite of japans advances, i don't think they can do it again.
5 people like this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello elmiko,
Well, that's because it was the hype of war against terrorism in the middle east that the President had no choice but to give it all he got since the 9/11 incident.as for Obama, i think he's taking a risk leaving the torn country to it's trained troops.i think the war has caused the depression some how.
5 people like this
@Absinto (2385)
• Portugal
19 Aug 10
Yes i do believe that their are too much US bases in the world, i mean come on there is a US base in the Azores. We are a small island and there is a big US base.
They should reduce these bases, i am not sure what the point of having many bases are but i know they will end up saving alot of money.
Goverments sometimes say that we our in financial crises, then why the h*ll are they adding new bases everywhere.
1 person likes this
@grayxenon (1313)
• Philippines
19 Aug 10
because corrupt official usually feed on so called projects, but the truth is they are busy filling their pockets with kickbacks./.
1 person likes this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello Absinto,
I believe they would still continue to have severe financial meltdown if they don't remove the bases that has no more significance anymore. like those in germany and Japan, that has long overdue since World war II.
No, graxy i think it's more of a controlled situation favoring the United States. "THEY NEED TO KNOW EVERYTHING" if not then, they consider Philippines as a threat.
5 people like this
@ybong007 (6643)
• Philippines
19 Aug 10
That's the main reason why the US is considered the most powerful country in the world. If we look at the number of bases they need to maintain we can surely say that they're spending a lot of people's money but that is just the tip of the iceberg. The economic benefits far outweighs the cost. Just take a look at how the world was affected when the US went into recession. Having military presence in other countries means that they can't be easily intimated and they can even dictate those to make decisions in their favor.
1 person likes this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello Ybong,
I agree, a lot business in other develop countries went down along with it. every single thing that we achieved is more likely connected with US influence. that includes military as well. sometimes, i wonder why people were happy about the removal of US base in subic, while now we have Veterans forces Agreement.
4 people like this
@ybong007 (6643)
• Philippines
23 Aug 10
I think not everyone was happy when the US base in subic was removed. With that much stake involve it's expected that there are a lot of people who will benefit but there are also a lot of people who'll end up the loser. It's just a matter of who will benefit the most. From an economic point of view, the philippines lost a lot in terms of taxes, the businesses along the subic, mainly the night clubs suffered as well that's how people look at it in the short term. But now, who would have thought that a useless base would turn into what subic is now. I remember that there are even toxic materials that our government has to dispose of when the americans left. Maybe it was just dumped somewhere else. The main purpose of letting the bases go was for our sovereignty because with them around it's just like having a big brother to turn when someone bullies you which we could make use of now that china is even a bigger bully. But then again, the US has been a long term ally of the philippines, they may lost a very strategic location in asia but i guess our ties is even deeper than that.
@jamed28 (1903)
• Philippines
19 Aug 10
US maybe blame for the conflict in some part of the world, but still this country make the world much safer. The muslim may not like it since they don't want to be control or policed but still if the Americans is not there, then maybe the third World War might have erupted. And yet they may also cause one. The presence of US bases in different part of the world is just a way of saying, they are super power. And it is intimidating to some, but the fact is still, they are really a super power country.
1 person likes this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello jamed28,
I am sure they didn't and they wont. much more US won't leave the middle east either after what happened in 9/11. besides, US government likes to train their troops in the wars all the time. they don't want them slacking out, they even have military practice war fare in some other countries and even their own land. time flies by that their presence won't last.
5 people like this
@grayxenon (1313)
• Philippines
19 Aug 10
And US is fond of joining or mediating in conflicts since they came into power, usually they include permanent bases in their deals when granting freedom/liberation, because they know the importance of having these bases, having military bases in foreign soil is a great military tactic/advantage (war tactics), they can easily anticipate threats, can easily conduct intelligence and also divert attacks when in war in the their mother land.
Good thing Philippine government acted upon on the issue when the US bases are still here. Just imagine if North Korea choses to go war against US, Philippines will surely be a part of it with those bases around.
1 person likes this
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello grayxenon,
good point there, or you too had been watching too many war movies :D. i agree, CIA intelligence can easily get in to the country with going through the Countries Airport. i guess it's a way for them to prevent another World WAr. During WWII, US didn't want to intervene until it escalated even further when their lithuania was shot down by German Sub.
5 people like this
@warmweatherwoman (2233)
• Atlantic City, New Jersey
19 Aug 10
Great topic! Because i have absolutely no military experience- I can honestly say that I have no clue why the US thinks we need so many worldwide. Is it for our protection? If so, why do we feel we need to be soo protected?? If we are doing things fairly to begin with.....things that make you go hmmmm.
I do have the experience of being an American, and I can tell you that my views about my own country at times surprise people - I feel like most of the time the US plays the role of bully- especially on foreign land.
My personal views about my country's military tactics are not good to say the least- but then again- I am no expert either. I just see what war does to all parties involved and I really feel there are better ways of resolving things.
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello WeatherWoman,
It's not really bullying a country., but i guess you're country tend to oppose or strong opposition if a country does something that could cause war or internal conflict with other nations. such conflicts with out US interferance could provoke another war.
6 people like this
@skysuccess (8858)
• Singapore
19 Aug 10
LetranKnight25,
In the first place, I do not think US military bases or installations will not even be present in these countries if these countries did not permit them.
I think we need to understand that such presence are mutual to begin with and if I may add both countries actually stand to benefit from one another. The most important one being that both countries will be able to learn from one another in terms of military tactics, weaponries and the latest conventional warfare when troops attend combine military exercise.
Also, US military presence will enhance a country's defense status whereby it would discourage or repelled adverse foreign elements. Other than that, the host country will also benefit economically with the presence of troops and facilities.
@skysuccess (8858)
• Singapore
22 Aug 10
LetranKnight25,
Let's not forget that the Japanese Prime Minister's resignation is not solely due to the Base.
As for vices, I think you are forgetting the fact that the military did not ask for them to be around. Can the US military be blamed for the oldest trade to thrive?
Lastly, are you sure that the US army is staying in your country for FREE? I find it hard to believe considering the fact that there's no free meal in this world.
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
19 Aug 10
There are many ways to look at the US bases around the world. The Governments of the Countries must want them there or they would not be there...The US is not in control of these countries. The US presence is often a big protection force for these countries. It is also a form of "foreign aid" since the US has to pay "Big Bucks" to stay there. Yeah, they do not get to stay there for free kids. The people stationed there also pump a lot of money into the local economy as do American tourists who come because there are "other" Americans there.
Shalom~Adoniah
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello Adoniah,
Yes, i agree that most reasons are for protection to those countries that are easily invaded by other nations who are agressive.but i wonder why they still stick around Japan when they have base in South Korea, because the threat there is the North.not only US pays for rent, they also sent foreign aid, i am pretty sure some Americans are already upset by this.
4 people like this
@dawnald (85146)
• Shingle Springs, California
23 Aug 10
I won't get into the history of it here, as I see other people have already done that. I would like to see the US get out of the business of trying to be the world's policeman, or at least only get involved as part of an international collaboration (ie the UN).
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
19 Aug 10
The U.S. is not the only country with military bases in various parts of the world. Off the top of my head...the U.K. and France also have bases on foreign soil. I'm sure there are others as well.
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello spalladino,
Yes, I remember Britain was once an empire once, that they lost their colonies after the second world war. for the Russians, they started loosing their communist influence that cost the fall out of the Soviet Union. if this continues, russia won't be considered as a super-power nation someday.but some how, in a way i prefer the US presence rather than other countries.
5 people like this
@for3verfamous (2190)
• Canada
19 Aug 10
It's already been mentioned but the United States is a powerful country.. There are so many people who live there, and it's a rich country. I don't think the bases will be removed, because the Americans will probably always have that power. They have money to spare that other countries don't.
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
Hello famous,
I agree that they won't leave or moved there. as for the situation in the Philippines, the US base was really about to move when the Volcano erupted, forcing them to stay there a bit longer. but the legislation found an opportunity to be heroes in taking out the base as part of large agenda to be head of office. people didn't knew the US base was about to leave anyways.
4 people like this
@capiks (40)
• Malaysia
19 Aug 10
I personally think the government have hidden agenda. I have watch many documentaries about the conspiracy of government(maybe just theories). World domination, maybe? :D
@LetranKnight25 (33121)
• Philippines
21 Aug 10
hello capiks,
there's always hidden agenda with regards to their presence. they like to know every thing about our country but they didn't like other countries getting to know about them, and their military bases
4 people like this