The Right to change you mind but Be ready for him not to.

That's sad... Well, since I don't know the full back story I can only comment in terms of assumption. But my guess is, she probably felt a little, and by a little I mean a lot of guilt after the first child was aborted. And that's what made her change her mind on her next baby. And I think maybe she is not thinking very rationally at the moment, and acting out of anger that's why she's suing her husband. She's lashing out because somehow she blames him for the loss of the first child and she blames herself as well. I would not be sure of the stability of either one of the parents right now. Both of them probably need a lot of counseling and sort it out that way instead of court. The mind feels things sometimes that we don't. If either one of them wakes up to reality then all of this will be sorted out. You are right, in this case, preferably it's the mother who needs to wake up from unrealistic delusions. She doesn't need child support, women these days are awesomely independent. But it's probably just love. It kinda tends to screw your mind to bits sometimes. But unfortunately for everyone involved, especially the baby, I don't think pacts hold up that well in court.

I do not endorse the views of that woman, as far as she suing her husband is concerned. Firstly, she is also responsible for her pregnancy (why did she go for unprotected s*x?). If she wants to bear the child and sues the father of the child, father will never support her in upbringing of the child, except for money.

If you hold that she has the right to have the child or abort and thereby have or not have the financial responsibility that that entails then you must hold that he also has the right to accept or not accept the financial responsibility or you are being discriminatory all the best urban

Since the girl keep the baby she must be ready to face a heavy burden because having a child with out a financial support from the father of the baby is indeed very difficult. But I admired her this time because she keep the baby alive and I'm sure whatever difficulties she may face in the future she will be much stronger because she had a baby inside her. I just hope that the father of the baby will find it in to his heart to accept the child as his own flesh and blood. After all the child was made because of them. I just felt pity for the baby.

If she wants to keep the baby, she should leave his husband if he doesn't want to get involved with it. But if she's a working mom, then I suggest her to not asking for a child support. Why would she ask money for someone that doesn't even care whether your baby is exist or not. It's just not worth it. But if she doesn't have an income to support her new life, then her husband better be giving her what she needs.

what is a family without a child ..if the marry each other then part of it is having a child ..they're not being realistic, they dont know what happiness a child could bring ..

I agree, it's her right to change her mind, and because of the way the courts are designed he is required to pay, but if he doesn't reform I wouldn't expect him to be a good dad. Father yes, dad, no. As the child of a single mom I can tell you there is difference.

Oh Sarah! This is terrible and my sympathies are with the unborn child. When this woman got into an agreement , she must have thought twice.No child asks to be born in this world and such a situation is terribly undesirable.

I am working with a gal right now that is in the same situation.....her husband it not happy. He was not wanted by his parents and emotionally abused because of it. So now she is pregnant and she says that he is coming around....we'll see. I think if she made that decision on her own she should be responsible....or she should have used birth control after the first incident.

I would put the baby up for adoption if both parents agree to it. Easier said then done.. I wouldn't trust the father to pay child support or would I want him in the child's life. I think this woman is making a big mistake keeping the child and expecting the father to be the father she wants! Otherwise this could turn into a real disaster! The child could be put in the middle over child support or visitation, maybe both! The child would be better off being raised by people who can't have children and give it the life it deserves!

I think there is some incorrect notion that when an un-willing parent see their baby for the first time, they will change their mind. Maybe the movies helped propagate this misconception. But I agree that she should have consulted with the father first before she went back on their agreement. It is unfair to the child if one parent is an un-willing participant in their life.

I'm trying to understand why a man who absolutely does not want any children wouldn't have protected his interests by having a vasectomy. That aside, I agree, she can't expect him to want the child simply because she decided she does. It's sad that he will have to pay support for a child they agreed not to have, but still, he should have taken steps to protect himself, especially after impregnating her the first time.

how sad..i think the lady should have undergone counselling in order for her to be more clarified of taking care of the child under her custody.