obama give 20,000,000 to hammas
By max1950
@max1950 (2306)
United States
August 25, 2010 9:22am CST
Something happened... H.R. 1388 was passed, behind our backs. You may want to read about it...
It wasn't mentioned on the news... Just went by on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN screen.
Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA . This is the news that did not, and will not, make the headlines...
By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza .
The "presidential determination" (ain't that nice?) which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States , was signed and appears in the Federal Register.
Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing, transportation and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.
Now we learn that he is allowing thousands of Palestinian refuges to move to, and live in, the US at American taxpayer expense.
These important, and insightful, issues are being "lost" in the blinding bail-outs and "stimulation" packages.
Doubtful? To verify this for yourself:
www.thefederalregister.com/.
1 person likes this
4 responses
@bunnybon7 (50973)
• Holiday, Florida
25 Aug 10
oh my lord, are we never going to wake up in usa in time to save our butts? 
no one seems to see whats happening to do anything about it. its like he has to much power already. I suppose Bush will be blamed for this to. worst of all is he hasnt done anything to stop the building of a mosque right near 911 and i think hes putting us right into civil war here. we will soon be under the law of Islam and no one cares enough to stop it
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
26 Aug 10
Yeah, but that didn't stop a New Jersey judge from deeming it ok for a Muslim to beat, rape, and torture his wife because the man insisted that his religion allows it. The poor woman couldn't even get a restraining order because the judge deemed the torture a "rough patch" in their marriage.
Feel free to read about the rape and torture and how a judge decided it was within the man's "1st amendment rights" to do this. I warn you, it's hard to stomach this.
http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/courts/appellate/a6107-08.opn.html
@TheMetallion (1834)
• United States
25 Aug 10
You still don't get it: In the US only people who wish to be bound by Sharia will be bound by it to the extent that Sharia doesn't conflict with US law. Under no circumstances will a Sharia court ever be permitted to issue a sentence of stoning or dismemberment both because US law limits criminal sanctions like capital punishment to the legal system and forbids cruel and unusual punishment -- dismemberment simply isn't Constitutional. An Imam who tries to issue such a ruling in the US will find himself prosecuted, as will anyone who tries to carry it out.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
26 Aug 10
A little something else to think on....
The irony is the mandate of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) determines which of the world’s huddled masses comes to the US as humanitarian refugees.
Humanitarian refugees have literally won the proverbial lottery. Typically, they receive green cards as resident aliens within a year of arrival and are eligible to become full US citizens within five years, unless they violate our immigration laws, commit a felony or are deported. In the process they are provided with cash stipend and social services assistance from federal, state, NGO’s and voluntary agency contractors.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/01/un-picks-who-be.html
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
25 Aug 10
There are genuinely some people there in desperate need of escape from a wholly corrupt regime. I don't mind my tax dollars going to actually help people in need.
What bugs me here are two things:
1: I don't trust our government to handle this very well at all (and more on that in 2).
2: Although I'm positive good-hearted, honest people want to flee, I'm also positive some America-hating, can't-wait-to-blow-sh*t-up knuckleheads will also try to climb aboard the "oppressed" wagon now that Captain America's footing the bill and offering free milk and cookies.
2a: Does an Obama administration actually try to weed out the good from the bad, or do they all count as victims? Because, let's face it, nobody stereotypes like a compassionate uberliberal.
2b: Does America's primarily liberal, heavily-Gaza-supporting mainstream hold the administration accountable if they don't, and will they bash and label everyone a racist who actually wants some accountability?
After all, it is a far left belief (I'm not sure just how many share it, but it does exist) that even the most cruel-hearted terrorist really just needs some compassion, and that it's partly America's fault they're hell bent on destruction in the first place.
@dlh0728 (29)
• United States
26 Aug 10
This is NUTS! I so wish American's would have "really" paid attention before they bought into this "hope & change" garbage! Problem is there is nothing we can do now - he's president! and the people put him there!!!!!!!
Hopefully America wakes up and can get some of these jerks out of office come November! People don't realize when they're blaming the previous guys - they are blaming themselves! They've had control for 4 years now!!
WAKE UP AMERICA!!
