Theo Walcott, Robin Van Persie injured for Arsenal!!
By ram_cv
@ram_cv (16513)
India
September 8, 2010 10:01pm CST
Arsenal's season once again seems to have an injured look as both Theo Walcott and Robin Van Persie are injured. Van Persie is out till October while it needs to be seen how long Walcott would be off. That means there is only Chamakh available up front. Do you think this will affect the Arsenal season already?
Cheers!
Ram
6 responses
@bangipung (155)
• Indonesia
10 Sep 10
of course, this is very bad news for arsenal fans, theo walcott is very important and influence player, he can make a difference for the game result
1 person likes this
@Glennbradbury (367)
•
11 Sep 10
I think that there are a few teams with injury problems already. Spurs have Dawson and Defoe injured.
1 person likes this
@sjlskl (3382)
• Singapore
17 Sep 10
As an Arsenal fan, I am used to seeing both of the players being out for a big chuck of the season. For some reason, Van Persie is always unlucky with injuries while Walcott always get injured when he hit form. If they can remain injury free at the end of the season, Arsenal will have a good shout at the title. Reason is that Arsenal always start the season well regardless of the injury list only to falter towards the end.
1 person likes this
@rappeter13 (8608)
• Romania
9 Sep 10
Poor Wenger, he always had a great injury misery, remember Eduardo and Ramsey. But I think this is the price of professional football, when the only thing that matters is money. There are too many games, players travel a lot, train every day, and have a game every 2-3 days. Of course, they are very good salary, but they are still human beings, money cannot buy more fitness and more physical power, more endurance. Their bodies get tired and are very vulnerable to injuries. I think that Chamakh is a very talented player, and he can be helped by Arshavin and Nasri, but of course is very difficult to play so many games with only one striker.
